Posted on 09/01/2022 1:32:33 AM PDT by dennisw
Vaccines are taking an average of 5 months to kill people The CDC has been hiding the Social Security Administration death master file. I got it from a whistleblower. This shows deaths are taking 5 months from the jab to happen. This is why it's hard to see.
Steve Kirsch 32 min ago Executive Summary We’ve always assumed the vaccine kills you quickly (in the first two weeks) because that’s when people notice the association and report it to VAERS. This is still true; it does kill some people quickly.
However, most of the deaths from the vaccine are happening an average of 5 months from the last dose for the second dose. It may be getting shorter the more shots you get but there are arguments both ways (since there can be survivor bias).
But this explains why the life insurance companies got off-the-charts all-cause mortality peaks for people under 60 in Q3 and Q4 rather than right after the shots rolled out.
The five month delay is also consistent with death reports where people are developing new aggressive cancers that are killing them over a 4 to 6 month period.
So when you hear of a death from stroke, cardiac arrest, heart attack, cancer, and suicide that is happening around 5 months after vaccination, it could very well be a vaccine-related death.
The data from the Social Security Administration death master file (ages 18 to 55) I got this chart from a whistleblower who works for HHS. This is data you are not supposed to see. The mortality increase (60% at peak) is huge. That sort of increase can only be caused by something novel that affected massive numbers of people.
There is only one possibility that fits that: the COVID vaccine.
The peak is September 9, 2021. -------- EXCERPT!
Who believes VAERS?
Certainly you won’t ever make it on to VAERS since you haven’t been a lab rat..
Just defending Big Pharma till your dying breath..
Trust their science and get the jabs Fury!!
Coincidence is not causation.
Why is it that only the anti Vaxxers raise these alarms if it were true? Is everyone else corrupt and bought off to hide and ignore these catastrophes?
There is no need to be vaccinated against Covid-19 at this point.
As far as warning people. I guess I assume that everyone here is well aware of the information pro and con, and has probably made up their mind a long time ago.
If a group of people here posted Gun Safety threads, 4-8 times a day, everyday, for over 2 years, would that be excessive?
At what point would a reasonable person think the people here “got it”?
Who is Winston smith?
You're kidding, right? There's more than a few FReepers that tout VAERS as proof for a variety of COVID-19 vaccination problems.
For now, I'll stick to my periodic RabAvert pre-exposure booster.
So VAERS is overstating the issue?
Poor Fury, people are not being truthful about anything are that?
Yeah and only vaccine reactions are reported by medical people.
So the woman that reported getting an STD from the vax should be believed.
I wonder how many raging anti-Vaxxers made “reports” to VAERS?
To help the cause of course. That a good enough justification.
None of the things you listed establish the truth of the massive deaths repeatedly stated by kirsch et Al.
Obviously the vaccines aren’t really vaccines because they don’t immunize but merely lessen the mortality.
Anyone who reads FR can form the obvious opinion.
Poor David and Fury.
Conspiracy theorists
You are one smart cookie. I mean that sincerely. Yes, hence the axiom “correlation does not equal causation”. Studies that look at correlation can be helpful insofar as they might point to an need for further research, though.
For example, if outbreaks of a particular tick-borne disease occur only or mainly where a certain species of mammal is found, that mammal may or may not be a natural reservoir. This correlation does point to the plausible reason for further investigation, though. Researchers go into the field, collect and test these mammals, and find they indeed carry the disease and are also infested with the same species of tick already known to carry the disease. Bingo. Or not — then start over and look for another species.
Proper studies looking at correlation plainly state they prove nothing but only point to a potentially promising area for further research.
Yes, you know what they say about “lies, d*** lies and statistics”. Amateurs and fraudsters using creative math (or faulty data) can sure churn out some whoppers! Even professionals sometimes err. That’s why it’s so important to scrutinize such studies. Statistical analysis can be very useful when properly applied to proper data sets. Otherwise, GIGO. And there’s lots of that floating around the web.
I always approach a study with skepticism, even if it’s in a reputable journal. Everyone should. Some check out, others don’t, while still others point to as-yet-unproven possibilities.
Thanks.
I think this is a good example of where the “peer review” model for academic review fails.
The “peers” accept the same low standard for statistical analysis that they use—nobody wants to “blow the whistle” on the practice since it could blow-back on them.
In my realm of people that I am associated with from family
to friends I know of no one that has died of covid-19 or that
has had reactions to the vaccine. Now reading the formum here
it seems that death or injury is almost certain with the shot.
Yes, the FDA is corrupt. Mass media is corrupt. Duh?
Or you believe the media that the all cause mortality spike in young people is caused by.... climate change? LOL
VAERS is a Fauct cheat sheet that understates the vaxxxxxx injuries and deaths. Partly because many/most Docs cheat and will not report obvious vaxxxxx deaths and injuries
I can only imagine that perhaps an undetected stroke caused by blood clots created some change in behavior that made the thought of it more acceptable?
The vaxxxx split is 85% do not suffer ill effects and 15% do. According to this very smart Doc. Go see him and learn more>>>>>>
https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD -—— (OK you are never vaxxxed)
Your experience is probably the same as most people.
Some folks would like us to believe that people are dying in the streets. I just don’t see it and I haven’t read any impartial reports that suggest it to be true.
Look in a mirror.
Better that than an uncontrollable obsession.
Is VAERS open for anyone to make a report?
Yes or no?
Have you explored VAERS and read some of the reports?
I have. I should post some of the gems.
Pregnancy, STDs, a broken leg, bowel obstruction, a rash but the doctor lied and said it’s poison Ivy, etc. etc.
You must really trust people. Have fun with that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.