Good question.
The answer has been true for centuries: urges overcome good sense.
Because he threatened them...as the chief law enforcement officer in the state he has vast powers to make someone’s life miserable.
A few of them didn’t. One of the women was shocked, yelled at him, took a picture, told a friend and that was that. She was appalled. Unless you are a woman who has been smacked by a man you have no idea what you are talking about. The ones going back, that is a phenomenon I don’t understand, but that doesn’t make it right.
I’m sure Schneiderman apologized profusely....and used the favorite line of the abuser: “it’ll never happen again.”
“Good question.”
Amazing that here where we know what evils powerful people in government can inflict to ruin ones life, we are puzzled by this!
Now put your thinking cap back on.
“Good question.”
No, it’s a very lousy question because it shifts the focus away from Cuomo, Schumer et al. This helps the dems.
The focus should be on what Cuomo, Schumers et al knew and when they knew it. This hurts the dems.
Intellectual exercise => Should we do things that a) help the dems; or b) hurt the dems?
Thanks!
The women had no self-respect and liked to be around power and the elite.