Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will the Obama Birth Certificate Forgery Ever Be Probed by Federal Authorities?
The Post & Email ^ | 12/7/2017 | Sharon Rondeau

Posted on 12/10/2017 5:08:23 PM PST by Elderberry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 541-556 next last
To: mabarker1

I agree with your recommendation but I feel that nothing will be done to the Obamas even if they find out that he was a total charlatan.
We will be the laughing stock of the world when they find out that some Kenyan jungle bunny screwed the greatest country in the world for a total of eight years. It will be noted in every history book in the world until the end of time. I can hear Obama and the RATS snicker and the rest of the world, too.


81 posted on 12/10/2017 10:07:29 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

Sharon Rondeau is really doing a great job! Wish I had some extra coin to toss at her...


82 posted on 12/10/2017 10:22:03 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

Mr. Lieutenant Quarles Harris:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/07/obamas_passport_breach_unanswered_questions_and_an_unsolved_murder.html

Shot in the head twice while sitting in his car.


83 posted on 12/10/2017 10:46:49 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Also, if it is found that Brak was ineligible, that makes every law, appointment, or decree he made immediately invalid.

It turns out that that is not true. The Supreme Court in 1886 established something called the "de facto officer doctrine":

"The de facto officer doctrine confers validity upon acts performed by a person acting under the color of official title even though it is later discovered that the legality of that person's appointment or election to office is deficient." - link

Of course, as hundreds of thousands of people have been researching the so-called "birther" theory for ten years, and haven't been able to come up with a single solid piece of evidence for it, that would seem to make it likely that it is just wishful thinking.

84 posted on 12/10/2017 11:09:13 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Ugh, the female supremes, just ewgh


85 posted on 12/10/2017 11:17:10 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: kiltie65

The theory at the time was Obama’s passport records needed “tidied up”. Then Harris was murdered immediately...dead men tell no tales. Really fishy...and the murder was never solved.


Barack Obama was never for one day a citizen until he was handed a ceremonial passport while serving as US Senator for govt travel. Who knows what story he concocted to get one without documentation. Perhaps he had said his mother gave birth at home in HI and they never sent in to get one. So to speed up the process, the govt gave him one for his upcoming voyage.

So during the campaign, “passport files were tampered with”: Obama’s, Hillary Clinton’s, and John McCain’s, the latter two to throw off the scent. But somebody had to die for it. Poor Lieutenant Harris.


86 posted on 12/10/2017 11:22:28 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

He wasn’t born in Kenya. Had almost nothing to do with his sperm donor. He was born in Canada.


87 posted on 12/10/2017 11:23:45 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: GTM01
He will have the power to get a copy of the original birth certificate from Hawaii

Even Trump is not powerful enough to produce that which does not exist.

88 posted on 12/10/2017 11:28:28 PM PST by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl
I hope Trump already has this info just to keep Barry’s piehole shut.

Misplaced hope because clearly Obama is unrestricted in speech or action.

89 posted on 12/10/2017 11:30:08 PM PST by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry
image image
90 posted on 12/10/2017 11:46:58 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2
image image
91 posted on 12/10/2017 11:50:50 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

This wasn’t from a university. It is from a flyer put out by his publisher. IIRC, it was in print for more than ten years.

And it’s customary for the author to write his own bio. Of course, some flunky came forward claiming she wrote it and was to “blame” for the “errors.”


92 posted on 12/11/2017 12:35:20 AM PST by Arthur McGowan (https://youtu.be/hj3e8cKZWiY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
It turns out that that is not true. The Supreme Court in 1886 established something called the "de facto officer doctrine":

"The de facto officer doctrine confers validity upon acts performed by a person acting under the color of official title even though it is later discovered that the legality of that person's appointment or election to office is deficient." - link

This is utter BS, the sort I'd expect from a bunch of lawyers.

If I were to go grab a shave and a haircut, pop on an Army uniform, grab a couple of Stars from the PX, and order soldiers to uphold the Constitution's Art. 4 Sec. 4 (guaranteeing protection against invasion) by securing the border, would such orders be legitimate? Note that they are in perfect alignment with the Constitution.

Of course, as hundreds of thousands of people have been researching the so-called "birther" theory for ten years, and haven't been able to come up with a single solid piece of evidence for it, that would seem to make it likely that it is just wishful thinking.

None of the legal challenges got heard; apparently nobody anywhere at anytime has any sort of standingbecause, reasons.

93 posted on 12/11/2017 4:44:53 AM PST by Edward.Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

I suspect you are correct. He probably obtained the documents long before he raised the birther issue in the first place.

He probably has a copy of the real Hawaiian document and knows all the ways the fake document was doctored.

Another reason that Obama wakes up in the middle of night from nightmares about Trump going after him.


94 posted on 12/11/2017 4:44:53 AM PST by poconopundit (MAGA... Get the Spirit. Grow your community. Focus on your Life's Work. Empower the Young.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

If someone is patently ineligible and his administration was a fraud perpetrated by conspiracy, yes that would mean lots of bad things.


95 posted on 12/11/2017 6:30:01 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Have you read this latest piece of tripe ?

And as usual, Connecticut.

http://www.cpusa.org/interact_cpusa/why-does-the-cpusa-support-democratic-party-candidates-for-the-presidency-instead-of-running-their-own-candidates/


96 posted on 12/11/2017 7:03:38 AM PST by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Washington Times articles from 2008.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/apr/19/key-witness-in-passport-fraud-case-fatally-shot/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/nov/01/security-breach-threatens-passport-applicants/

Follow up 2012 story from the Washington Examiner.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/state-department-employee-pleads-guilty-to-identity-theft/article/2511929


97 posted on 12/11/2017 7:57:39 AM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

p


98 posted on 12/11/2017 8:06:28 AM PST by bitt (press takes him literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

In fact a preponderance of evidence has surfaced. It’s just that most people don’t know about it.

First, there is an ~10 month period in Stanley Ann’s life—the exact timeframe when she would have been pregnant and given birth—when no one anywhere admits to having seen her. She simply disappeared off the grid—the only time in her life that is wholly unaccounted for.

Second, it’s been established that during this period SA was not living with her parents or with her supposed husband. In fact, she had no HI address for this timeframe, and the address listed on both the fabricated birth certificate and the birth announcements is one where SA and the baby NEVER lived.

The first verified sighting of Stanley Ann and her newborn was 2,683 miles away from Honolulu. I.e.: the first confirmed sighting of Stanley Ann and her baby was in Seattle.

Sally Jacobs, via a FOIA request, obtained a document in which Obama Sr says the baby will likely be put up for adoption at the Salvation Army home for unwed mothers. There is not and has never been such an establishment in HI, but Seattle is only a stone’s throw from the Salvation Army home for unwed mothers in Vancouver.

Given airline restrictions in 1961, it’s a virtual impossibility that SA gave birth in HI and then rushed the newborn onto a flight for Seattle. [Two independent sources place SA in Seattle in the latter part of August.] If she’d given birth in HI, there would have been no reason to pay the exorbitant cost of relocating to Seattle anyway. Her school and family were in HI, and she knew no one in Seattle.

Add to that the FACT that the BC is fabricated. Three separate eyewitnesses say that what was in Obama’s HI records file was “handwritten.” One witness specifically stated that Obama had no BC on file. The handwritten notes tie in with the many anomalies associated with Obama’s HI records. The likeliest source for them is Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Dunham. After Stanley Ann ended up either opting to keep the baby or being stuck with him, grandma would have gone into action to obtain US citizenship for him. HI made these kinds of under the table transactions easy; hence the handwritten notes and the newspaper birth announcements.

There is a lot more, but that’s the gist of it. The probability that Obama was born in Canada approaches 100%. Having the actual BC probably wouldn’t increase those odds. It’s a near certainty that SA didn’t register (at the home for unwed mothers) under her real name, or list the baby as Barack Obama II. Personally I don’t see the need for the Canadian BC; the evidence speaks for itself.


99 posted on 12/11/2017 8:30:29 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

doesn’t matter...as far as SCOTUS is concerned...nobody has standing


100 posted on 12/11/2017 9:05:42 AM PST by stylin19a (Best.Election.of.All-Times.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 541-556 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson