Posted on 08/13/2017 3:15:16 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
A friend and fellow SCV & SCV Mechanized Cavalry member named JD Montes posted this and it says better than I could say what I believe to be happening in our country right now. Read his words below:
.......They pick "low-hanging fruit" causes such as Confederate memorials to incense their base and draw support in preparation for an intentional bait-and-switch. In reality they are Anti-American, anti-liberty, unilateralists, pro-violence, pro-revenge and antithetical to the historical American experience.
Their goal is cultural revisionism and erasure of history like the NAZI ideology they falsely oppose. They are the modern American "NAZI" movement. Intent on tearing down our great Constitutional- Republic with fake causes intending to rebuild under their communist umbrella of suppression of the people, not freedom for people. They are fakes who will pivot from Confederate memorials to taking down images of US Founding Fathers. They already want to take down President Andrew Jacksons statue in Jacksonville Fl and they have a movement afoot to take down Thomas Jefferson on the Columbia University campus.
Make no mistake; their soil is Marxism under the disguise of opposing racism and bigotry only to grow cultural and ideological revisionism upon an unsuspecting citizenry. They are like Greek sirens calling people with their trumpets only to mislead them to more evil and insidious anti-americanism.
Sadly the American MSM is part of that movement; fully lying to the public while plotting their eventual takeover. They cannot take America by force from the outside, so they choose to take America from the inside. US President Abraham Lincoln was right about one thing: "“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” So it is today.
The ACLU and the and other civil liberty organizations supported yesterday's rally in the name of free speech. The Federal court granted permit to the organizers only to have a city council attempt to force them to move their lawful assembly miles outside of town due to (you guessed it: ANTIFA and BLM dissent). But real liberty, Liberals argue, does not recognize only speech with which you agree. It recognizes and protects that speech. So what have we here?
We have the suppression of a rally only because of disagreement with their message of keeping the memorials standing while the real "haters" spread their divisive message of tearing down veterans memorials across this land to serve their false intent.
If history is to record the past, then let it record the past for the good of the future. Should we erase history because it does not comport with our sensitivities, taste or flavor. Maybe we should outlaw all ice cream except chocolate. But frankly taste and opinion are personal. So if sensitivity and opinions are a fluid concept in the liberal mind, why would a political party like Democrats buy into Marxism leading to Communism? Because it suits their political agenda, all the while unknowingly (or maybe knowingly) selling out American ideals of capitalism and individual liberty to movements like ANTIFA and BLM.
These memorials, these monuments were gifts to Southern states who fought for a cause that was self-preservation. The rally cry of the Marxists is that its all about slavery. But to say that 'slavery' was the primary cause in and of itself is too easy, too simple, too unthinking. Rather a pervasive examination of the American political and economic machine in the early days of this nation is required to truly understand "The Cause". The American War between the states was no more solely about slavery than just being solely about battles and men, but moreso, that slavery was merely a singular subelement of broader reasons of self government and true constitutionalism. That, my friends, is truly American? Where is George Washington when I need him?
I am not justifying slavery, but I am stating that slavery was not the primary cause of any "civil war". It is but a convenient term given to us by the victors because its sounds moral, holy and worthy in a war that the North was losing until Lincoln's self-reluctant Emancipation Proclamation made it a moral battle. This war was about keeping the Union together at all costs in his eyes. So sound bites, digitized words, photos, and singularly defined negative words do no justice to the history of this nation's greatest internal conflict. It does no justice to the sons, fathers and families that gave the ultimate sacrifice to their state when duty called. These monuments are to dead veterans who fought for their homeland states --- something we today truly understand politically and know little about without deeper examination in a historical context. Frankly, they are all veterans...AMERICAN veterans as declared by the US Congress in the 1950s. They were brothers vs brothers and fathers vs fathers. These memorials should be protected and embraced like the prodigal son; not eschewed and reviled.
In the end, this isn't about racism or bigotry from an inanimate object standing silently in a park or courthouse lawn. It is about whether this nation will live up to its constitutional principles and ideals of free speech or do we embrace the false and darker path of allowing unilateral opinion to destroy Southern history which is really American history.
Do we really believe in our Constitution? Or are we just lapdogs for every PC movement that comes along with faux causes disguised in pretty verbiage that really intend to attack our Constitutional form of government under false pretense of defying racism and bigotry?
So if only one side is allowed to protest...if only one brother in a war is to be revered...if only one mother is allowed to weep for her dead child...if only one father is permitted to honor his lost son at war...if only one side receives just because of past wrongs...if the media relates one opinion and not just the facts...then are BLM, MSM and ANTIFA honesty against Facism? Or are they for it?
Better yet, are WE for it? If so this social experiment built on individual liberty and freedom...it wont last much longer.
I say, Herman Goebbels would be proud of these intentionally fake movements.
Herman Goebbels?
I’m sure that the Sessions’ Civil Rights Div will get to the bottom of this claim as a significant part of their “investigation”.
“Antifa” is similar to “Intifada”:
Intifada
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be confused with Infitah.
Intifada is an Arabic word literally meaning, as a noun, “tremor”, “shivering”, “shuddering”.[1][2] It is derived from an Arabic term nafada meaning “to shake”, “shake off”, “get rid of”,[1] as a dog might shrug off water, or as one might shake off sleep,[3] or dirt from one’s sandals,[4] and is a key concept in contemporary Arabic usage referring to a legitimate uprising against oppression.[5] It is often rendered into English as “uprising”, “resistance”, or “rebellion”.
The concept intifada was first utilized in modern times in 1952 within the Kingdom of Iraq, when socialist and communist parties took to the streets to protest the Hashemite monarchy, with inspiration of the 1952 Egyptian Revolution. In the Palestinian context, with which it is particularly associated, the word refers to attempts to “shake off” the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip in the First and Second Intifadas,[5][6] where it was originally chosen to connote “aggressive nonviolent resistance”,[1] a meaning it bore among Palestinian students in struggles in the 1980s and which they adopted as less confrontational than terms in earlier militant rhetoric since it bore no nuance of violence.[4]
Continues here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intifada
Interesting points...
Where will it end with This Revisionist P.C. junk?
See too, “Industrial Workers of the World”
Why doesn’t Trump denounce by name the whiter supremacists and also call Antifa a Marxist Communist movement.
You think the left isn’t totally unhinged? Read this from someone posted at democraticunderground. Yeah, they are wack o friggin’ doodle and dangerous:
https://democraticunderground.com/10029451636
The Right is looking at the results of their hate mongering today in Charlottesville while gasping in disbelief.
“We didn’t cause this! This isn’t what we wanted!” they all exclaim.
When you fought to control women through reproductive abuse, you caused this.
When you fought to instill your brand of religious terrorism as law, you caused this.
When you denied well researched and scientifically proven facts, you caused this.
When you stayed silent in the face of continued illegal redlining, you caused this.
When you denied the facts showing a wage gap exists, you caused this.
When you allowed a hoodie to be a sign of guilt and a reason to enact deadly force, you caused this.
When you elected officials who enacted egregious legislation that laid the bulk of the country’s taxes on the poor and middle class while ceding numerous tax breaks to the wealthy, you caused this.
When you said All Lives Matter, you caused this.
When you denied or repealed laws for safe, sane gun safety, you caused this.
When you fought to keep people in love from marrying each other, you caused this.
When you looked the other way as the NFL signed wife beaters and dog fighters yet left a peaceful protester in the cold, you caused this.
When you myopically focused only on emails that were proven time and again to be a nonissue, you caused this.
When you put on that red hat, you caused this.
When you chanted “lock her up,” you caused this.
When you decided grabbing pussies was a presidential act, you caused this.
When you laughed as a man called for interference in our election process, you caused this.
When you ignored the disabled and the families of those who died for your rights being mocked, you caused this.
When you decided “anyone but her” was guiding you in the voting booth, you caused this.
When you canonized a man who has nothing but bankruptcies, broken marriages, and failing resorts to his name because he’s white and has a penis, you caused this.
When you vilified a public servant who’s worked for nearly three decades for people in need, you caused this.
When you voted for a man who is in no way qualified to lead a sing-a-long, much less a country, you caused this.
You caused this when you put party over country and this DOES represent you. This represents every dirty, nasty, self-centered thing about you.
When the historians look back on this era in America, they will not look on you kindly. You will be seen for the villains you are, rather than the victims you see yourself to be.
THIS is who you are.
– Brenay Brock, Normal In This House
Anti-truth, anti-freedom, anti-individual, anti-life collectives.
I'm not.
I'm not.
Foolishness.
Marxism-Leninism is about economic opponents.
BLM and Antifa are about racial war.
The twentieth century was the century of ideology. The twenty-first is the century of the blood. Want to see your uniform?
Look in the mirror.
Soros is playing a behind-the-scenes Lenin.
The white supremacists in question are antifas. It was/is a stage show.
How is he supposed to figure out which ones are whiter?
These socialist communist front people would have
had no qualms about hanging Lee or any other southern
figure...in fact they would have no qualms about hanging
conservatives, it’s what they always DO.
Lenin used “racism” as a communist weapon, against the “wrong” white ethnicity, as I understand it.
So-called racism is just another quarrel in the quiver of the communist.
It is always about divide and conquer. So, yes, this is communism in action.
"ANTIFA and BLM are pretextual names for movements better known as Marxist-Communists"
They would be shot first.
>> Marxism-Leninism is about economic opponents. BLM and Antifa are about racial war <<
Agreed. But I think a bunch of them are also declared anarchists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.