Posted on 08/03/2017 11:50:21 AM PDT by Starman417
He warned them. He said the Jihadis would take over if they took him out:
Muammar Gaddafi warned Tony Blair in two fraught phone conversations in 2011 that his removal from the Libyan leadership would open a space for al-Qaida to seize control of the country and even launch an invasion of Europe.Gaddafi was in a box. He was under control. He was fighting the Islamists.The transcripts of the conversations have been published with Blair’s agreement by the UK foreign affairs select committee, which is conducting an inquiry into the western air campaign that led to the ousting and killing of Gaddafi in October 2011.
In the two calls the former British prime minister pleaded with Gaddafi to stand aside or end the violence. The transcripts reveal the gulf in understanding between Gaddafi and the west over what was occurring in his country and the nature of the threat he was facing.
Muammar Gaddafi warned Tony Blair in two fraught phone conversations in 2011 that his removal from the Libyan leadership would open a space for al-Qaida to seize control of the country and even launch an invasion of Europe.
In the first call, at 11.15am on 25 February 2011, Gaddafi gave a warning in part borne out by future events: “They [jihadis] want to control the Mediterranean and then they will attack Europe.”That wasn't good enough.In the second call, at 3.25pm the same day, the Libyan leader said: “We are not fighting them, they are attacking us. I want to tell you the truth. It is not a difficult situation at all. The story is simply this: an organisation has laid down sleeping cells in north Africa. Called the al-Qaida organisation in north Africa … The sleeping cells in Libya are similar to dormant cells in America before 9/11.”
barack obama, with hillary's full support, toppled the Gaddafi regime. obama, ever the perennial liar, first claimed regime change was not the goal.
U.S. insists “we’re not hunting Qaddafi”
U.S.: Gaddafi not target of allied military action
Obama also said ISIS was about finished.
He also said the Taliban was decimated.
hillary clinton found the death of Moammar Gaddafi quite amusing:
Proving that they learned absolutely nothing from Iraq, they knocked over a regime and had no plans for the aftermath. obama admitted that was his biggest mistake, although he was one of the only two people on Earth who didn't know it was a yuge mistake at the time.
As they say, actions have consequences.
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net ...
I’ll drink to that!
;)
El DickO!
*****
JV squad ...
A lot more American armed forces would be alive today if not for the leftists’ god and BJ’s wife.
Is ISIS the CIA or Pentagon backed jihadists ?
If not for Obama and Hillary, I don’t think ISIS would even exist.
And what’s the excuse for the ending of ISIS being further along by much in Iraq?
Oh, come now! How did you expect 0bama and Hillary! (and other CongressPukes!) to line their pockets without keeping the Military Industrial Machine, ‘oiled,’ as it were?
A pox on all of their houses!
I thought they are already “about finished”?
Obama said the Taliban was “decimated”...HE WAS CORRECT.
He was using the word in that way that most idiots use it; he and his fellow idiots think it means “overwhelmingly destroyed”, when in fact it indicates “TEN PERCENT destroyed. The Taliban is always in a state of being “decimated”, and they regain part of that 10% quickly.
WOT is a complete FAIL from Bush to Trump. Expecting different results from administrations doing the same thing is insanity. Close to 10,000 KIA and thousands maimed for life and nothing to show for it accept for Iraqi,Afghani,Syrian,Libyan “freedom”? Furthermore,how many have we imported to colonize America? I would think one dead American soldier for every 1000 immigrants who will multiply ten fold.
If not for 0bama, Hillary and McCain ISIS would probably not exist.
The tool of the globalists invasion of Europe was be two pronged.
One prong was to be the creation of active combat space in the Middle East for the Jihadists who would operate on an international level.
Neither Hamas nor Hezbollah qualified.
From 2008 to 2010, in Iraq, Al Queda and ISIS had lost the ability to be a major force and internal security in Iraq grew to be stronger than anytime since 2003.
Then the situation in Iraq, Syria and Libya began to change in 2011, just two years into the Obama administration.
Obama and Maliki failed to agree to a SOFA agreement for a continued ACTIVE major U.S. security support role in Iraq. Maliki, adrift from any major U.S. influence on his actions began to govern as a Shiite Sunni more than an Iraqi, angering Sunnis all over Iraqi society and increasing the recruitment possibilities for ISIS and Al Queda looking for Sunni recruits. ISIS began to plan.
Then opportunities fell into ISIS and Al Queda’s laps.
Western regime change agendas in Syria and Libya created two highly destabilized states.
ISIS moved in force into Syria’s destabilized northern region and created cells all over Syria. Syria was a combat theater it could build with, a theater Iraq would not enter. In time, ISIS was strong enough to reenter Iraq in force and take major Iraqi cities.
The western regime change agenda in Libya did pretty much the same thing, and yes, intentional regime change it was no matter the lies and pretension of the Obama administration.
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/03/22/libya-and-the-myth-of-humanitarian-intervention/
In a few short years Iraq, Syria and Libya had become theaters of combat experience, organization building and recruitment to ISIS, Al Queda and other Jihadists. From that would come the movement of cells of those organizations into Europe, to create anti-Muslim backlash to their terrorism on European soil, from which to claim “Islamaphobia” the cause, from which to recruit inside Europe.
The legs of the first prong were complete.
The second prong of the invasion was to make Europe as the prearranged destination of the millions of refugees manufactured by the INTENTIONAL destabilization of Iraq, Syria and Libya. From the second prong would come the future storehouse of Islamist recruitment in Europe.
It was all pre-planned and that’s why you see the treasonous globalist leaders in the EU NOT objecting to the invasion but trying to impose it on the unwilling among them. The treasonous leaders know they are not dealing with an accidental human calamity the fine citizens have no guilt over. But the treasonous EU leaders ARE guilty. They as much as anyone have been behind or agreeing with the destabilization of Iraq, Syria and Libya in 2011, and making their own people responsible for the invasions to Europe those acts manufactured.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.