Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If you were to only have Three Guns for Survival
Am Shooting Journal ^ | 3/28/2017 | J Stokes

Posted on 03/28/2017 7:48:50 AM PDT by w1n1

What would those three guns be? Jerry Miculek had a chance to voice his response on the subject.

Wait, before we get to the guns, just to clarify that we’re talking about having these three guns for survival.

Some folks have talked about the .357 revolver as a primary SHTF in many internet forums and this has stirred up the hornet’s nest. Mainly due to the age demographics, for instances, folks that are from the older generation would agree with the .357 revolver. Where the younger millennium generation will stick with the striker based handguns like the Glocks in 9mm.

Don’t think so?, someone had asked this question to shootist extraordinaire Jerry Miculek and even he went with an 8-shot .357 wheelgun–specifically a Smith & Wesson 627–as his one handgun for every situation. Take a look here.


TOPICS: Hobbies; Outdoors
KEYWORDS: 357revolver; banglist; glocks; miculek; shtf; survivalists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: mountn man

I agree with the Remington 700, if we could go with four instead of three.


81 posted on 03/28/2017 9:51:08 AM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

In a semi-auto, I’d definitely go with a Glock 19. However, if I had to only have one handgun, I’d go with the .357 mag because of the variety of ammo it can take.


82 posted on 03/28/2017 9:53:57 AM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Wait... why a 1911 Colt .45? I’m not challenging you; I just don’t know what the third gun is for. (I grew up in NY; I endorse gun ownership, but the gun culture is fairly alien to me.)

Why? There's a reason it's considered the world's best combat handgun. Maybe you're confusing it with the old western six-gun.

Additionally, for me, it's familiarity. I can disassemble/assemble it completely, blindfolded and drunk. I've shot almost 30 different ones, many of them 1944 manufacture Mil-issue, in the 70's and 80's. Never had a problem with a one of them.

My first preference is the Commander, though. :-)
83 posted on 03/28/2017 10:12:46 AM PDT by 98ZJ USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Chuckster

+1

Point taken


84 posted on 03/28/2017 10:24:57 AM PDT by wardaddy (We're gonna have to kill a lot of them eventually which is hard to fathom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Two Kids' Dad
For close range - Scorpion EVO in 9mm For mid range - AR-15 in .223 or 7.62x39 For distance - Barrett .50 BMG

50 bmg rounds cost $3.50 -$5.50 EACH

338 Lapua are almost the same.

300 Win mags/ 7mm mags 1000-1500 yds. depending on the load. $1.00 -$1.50 per round, unless hand loading.

Barrett 50 bmg costs $3500-$7500 depending on model. Remington 700 in 300 win mag or 7mm mag, $750-$1000.

50 bmg is one HEAVY gun.
23-33 pounds, sans scope and ammo.
About 4 oz per round. 100 rounds = 25 pounds

Add on optics.
Going to be expensive for those handling the punch that a 50 or 338 gives and the ranges they reach.

Lastly...the gun is only as good as the shooter.
Whether the gun can reach out 1000-2500 yds, doesn't mean the shooter can.
Most people will never go beyond 400 yds or even 600 out west.
600 yds is someone experienced.

Unless someone is experienced and very good with a gun, a gun in 308/30.06 is more than adequate, and the rounds are cheap, especially when hand loading.

85 posted on 03/28/2017 10:29:28 AM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

And a .38 special.

86 posted on 03/28/2017 10:32:19 AM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

Opinions about brands and caliber preferences on this question lead straight into the weeds. Cutting through the clatter, I’d just opine that, for basic survival, one should have:

1. A rifle capable of knocking down large game or predators, with accuracy, and at distances up to several hundred yards.

2. A pistol for up close and personal protection, which is capable of knocking down most large mammals.

3. A shotgun for hunting, and defense against multiple attackers/predators.


87 posted on 03/28/2017 10:32:46 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

Survival or SHTF survival. Those are two different things. If regular “survival in the wilderness” it would be a .22, 12 gauge and .45. For SHTF, .22, 12 gauge and an AR-15.


88 posted on 03/28/2017 10:34:09 AM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountn man

You make valid points. My thinking was that, in a survival situation, I’d want to have a couple of reasonable weapons for primary use and back them up with a monster, just in case it’s needed.


89 posted on 03/28/2017 10:37:52 AM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( Make America America Again ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

In the first 88 posts:

8 votes for the AK

13 votes for the 1911

13 votes for an AR

15 for the .357

21 for a 12 gauge

28 for the .22LR (with a lot of specific preferences)

There are also a few Glocks, a few bolt rifles, and a few other choices, but most of the picks are listed above.

____________________________________________________________

One firearm that didn’t get enough mention is the Henry Survival Rifle, which is perfect for members of the FR Boating Club. It floats!


90 posted on 03/28/2017 11:14:27 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loucon

Great Gun, I would add that one to my larger/longer list! Anything by Henry is just fine!!!


91 posted on 03/28/2017 11:32:05 AM PDT by EXCH54FE (Hurricane 416,Feisty Old Vet !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: LambSlave

I’m with you on this. In reality, what good is a handgun in a true survival situation?


92 posted on 03/28/2017 11:41:09 AM PDT by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mountn man
The adapter nut is considered a suppressor by the ATF. Don't end up in jail.


93 posted on 03/28/2017 11:59:47 AM PDT by farming pharmer (www.sterlingheightsreport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

“Survival” is key here.

Since the limit is three(3) firearms, this calls for careful consideration:

1. A 22lr rifle is needed for small game harvesting while preserving meat. Is low report will also permit better sound security. An improvised suppressor can be constructed.

2. In stead of a HG for CQB, an accurate carbine (AR15) chambered in a superior cartridge is a much more flexible choice. This can be carried as a sidearm, but it will handle threats out to 300 yards.

3. Beyond 300 yards an accurate, scoped rifle in a commonly available cartridge (308Win) addresses operational requirements not handled by choise 1 and 2. This rifle will take any game on the NA continent while permitting the engagement of threats out to 800 yards.

Each cartridge serves a special purpose which are key for survival.


94 posted on 03/28/2017 12:13:37 PM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

“For survival” can mean many things.

A .22 rifle would be on any list.


95 posted on 03/28/2017 1:16:30 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

Survival (Food / Defense) .... ?

Suppressed 10-22

Suppressed Ruger Mk 1

Suppressed AR-15


96 posted on 03/28/2017 1:35:48 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I’m with you flier...., In the weeds,. Seriously since I didn’t see a specific SHTF; civil unrest or wilderness survival. If civil, for me I’ve got a custom bolt action pistol that is as quiet as it comes, for something that in my hands will get the job done out past what a bumper jack can reach. My wheel gun, though in my hands (Mecklek is beyond fast) not as fast as some, will keep the jackals from rushing me until I get my 590 in play. For survival would only need one, though would carry two. I reload so it didn’t matter how long it lasts, either way I’m in play until something else happens supplies isn’t what I’ll run out of first,. Targets perhaps.... Anything I don’t have either would be laying around or I won’t need.


97 posted on 03/28/2017 1:38:46 PM PDT by Oil Object Insp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Oil Object Insp

Some old shooters will tell you that the best gun for a given situation is the one closest to you.

I think there’s a lot of wisdom in that.


98 posted on 03/28/2017 3:22:54 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

Who wants to lug around 3 guns in a survival situation, let alone a heavy 12ga. A versatile 5.56 is probably all you want.


99 posted on 03/28/2017 5:14:31 PM PDT by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1n1
M68 main gun. *Only* a 105, but I know exactly what I'm doing with one,and the smaller ammunition allows 63 rounds to be carried as a basic load. Co-ax? I'm happy with either an M240 in 7,62 or an old M37 Browning gun in .30-06. 6000 rounds in the ready tray, please, and about 12,000 more in cans on the floor for top-ups and reloads. A German MG3 would do, or a Russian PKT, if that's all there's ammo for. No old M73 or M219, however, please!

And, of course, an M2 .50 in or on top of the commander's cupe or on a Chrysler gun mount. Not an M85, though the gun's okay, but the ammo any grunts or wheelies have along will be more likely to be canned up in links for the M2. About a thousand rounds inside, and about double that outside in the bustle rack should do, 30 or 35-cans worth in all. If I've got a qualified commander, that's fine; if not, I can shoot from the TCs position. I've got an okay driver, and breaking in a new loader isn't much of a chore. On the way!


100 posted on 03/29/2017 3:28:52 AM PDT by archy (Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Except bears, they'll kill you a little, and eat you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson