Posted on 10/16/2016 7:29:18 AM PDT by kiryandil
I just tried to nail a NYT Clinton campaign scribe who pretends to work for Sulzberger's Blog [New York Times] with one of the Podesta email links.
The site said it appeared to be an automated Tweet, and wouldn't let it through.
LOLOLOL!
Try using tinyurl and see if goes through.
Please let your thread know if it works.
Whoa! There is NO Eff in Way!!!
The Total Election Rig Is ON!!!
Get this...
Former Huffington Post columnist discusses having his You Tube ad revenue suspended for publishing a single video about the Podesta emails.
Also...discusses collusion at the highest levels of Google, skewed Google search algorithms suppressing content and bogus trending of Clinton favorable videos.
WIKILEAKS BOMBSHELL: Google In Collusion With Hillary Clinton
https://youtu.be/XjriFeApwlo
No, it's not. But, it may have triggered an automated detection algorithm at Twitter, affecting all users.
I don't have a Twitter account: is there an "abuse" button to report automated spam? If so, you may be seeing the effect of a concerted effort by the left to suppress it by reporting Wikileaks email URLs as abuse.
Yes, it could be human intervention by someone at Twitter. But, it could also be a group of people gaming the system by taking advantage of the lack of human oversight.
Same thing happened me - said it could be mistaken for spamming. :)
Who were you trying to nail? Could we come up with a way to disguise it. Mine was also about the NYSlimes.
No big deal for a computer to handle, as I said.
I may have just a wee bit of experience in the field. :)
This goes along with today’s CNN Meme that it is ILLEGAL for you to know what is in the leaked emails.
And that you should only be allowed to know what CNN tells you about them.
I'm busy loading more rounds into the FR artillery batteries. :)
I have a bit of experience in the field, too. And, I never claimed it was a DOS attack. Neither did Twitter.
Remember that Twitter handles thousands of messages a second. Any algorithm that looks for spamming of a URL could easily be fooled by the large number of tweets containing a Wikileaks email URL. With all the people reading the emails and posting links to what they find, there will be a lot of them.
Without a human to understand the context, the algorithm could mistake it for a concerted effort by spam bots.
They did this before.
WikiLeaks Makes DNC Look Bad - Banned on Facebook and Shadowbanned on Twitter
http://investmentwatchblog.com/twitter-is-shadow-banning-dncleak-to-make-it-go-down-in-trends-and-wikileaks-links-are-banned-on-facebook-now/
Try posting in a form the human mind can interpret correctly; but, the monitor bots are likely to miss as bad spelling. Anyone want to take a crack at creating an application to do this on the fly when posting to media? Might be as confounding to some as writing in cursive!
“fi yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae a sgtrane mnid too. Cna yuo raed tihs?”
http://www.dailywritingtips.com/cna-yuo-raed-tihs/
http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/matt.davis/cmabridge/
https://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/personal/matt.davis/Cmabrigde/rawlinson.html
Someone well versed in fooling an anti-spam filter, would be a more apt description of the qualification for slipping past the guardians at the gate.
It’s coming - James O”Keefe just tweeted...less than 24hrs now...:)
Thanks Keep up the good work
Just use a hashtag that is acceptable and shadow distribute it.
Yes the tiny url does work.. posted the wikilinks and it didnt block it.
If you’re not already following them, you might take a look at Paul Joseph Watson @PrisonPlanet and Stefan Molyneux @StefanMolyneux
Scott Adams gets interviewed by Stefan Molyneux occasionally, I believe.
I’ve seen that stuff before. Thanks for posting! :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.