Posted on 10/06/2016 9:18:37 AM PDT by PROCON
The only way to keep young people from inheriting a world reeling from catastrophic climate change is to reduce carbon dioxide emissions dramatically and immediately, according to a new paper. Not only that, but it's also necessary to aggressively remove greenhouse gas that's already accumulated.
"If rapid emission reductions are initiated soon, it is still possible that at least a large fraction of required CO2 extraction can be achieved via relatively natural agricultural and forestry practices with other benefits," the authors wrote.
"On the other hand, if large fossil fuel emissions are allowed to continue, the scale and cost of industrial CO2 extraction, occurring in conjunction with a deteriorating climate with growing economic effects, may become unmanageable. Simply put, the burden placed on young people and future generations may become too heavy to bear."
(Excerpt) Read more at insideclimatenews.org ...
They should be working on water sequestration. Erf needs to be more like Mars.
Well done.
These people are insane mass murder wannabees.
If CO2 drops below 0.02% plants start dying off and us with it. Right now it’s at 0.04% and these lunatics want to lower it. You ever see that movie “The road”? Thats what the world would look like below 0.02%
Problem solved!
Cut down all the trees you can, and pave over the area.
This is pure madness.
Madness has no logic; no plan. But they do have a goal: the eradication of billions of people (Agenda 21).
I am sick of Idiots with megaphones "chicken littleing" about CarbonDiOxide instead of water vapor which is far more dangerous if their theory were correct.
Yes ladies and gentlemen, everything these Lying fools say is done by C02, Water Vapor does better. It absorbs a wider spectrum of solar radiation, it retains the heat much better, and the earth naturally produces it in levels many thousands of times greater than man made C02.
We should be hitting C02 advocates in the mouth for their constant lying. Water Vapor does everything C02 does, but many times better. That we are surviving on a planet with such strong concentrations of the "green house gas" known as "Water Vapor", demonstrates that their theory of global warming is completely wrong.
“They made a movie called ‘Logan’s Run’ set in the future, and there ain’t no n______s in it....I said, “White people ain’t plannin’ for us to be here.’” - Richard Pryor
There's always another way. When someone writes that they are herding people into a favored solution, usually a leftist one. The obvious other way is to increase CO2 absorption.
Thank you.
I see this whole AGW thing about not just money, but control. It’s why the bad guy is CO2. CO2 is NECESSARY for the existence of life. Further, it is a byproduct of virtually every activity performed by human beings, including the very act of breathing.
Once you are able to legitimately control CO2 output, you can control every aspect of human existence, right down to how many times you are allowed to have sex with your wife.
And don’t, for a minute, thing that it would not come down to things like that - if the Lord waits.
AGW is not about global warming. It is about controlling the human species down to the lowest level. It’s why it is my most important issue in this election.
When I was in school, they taught us that is what trees and plants do.
I don’t know if they can or not, but if they can, that is what I want them to do. Remove every iota of co2 from the atmosphere. Then let them die.
"It was published in a discussion journal, where research is published and sent for peer review at the same time.
"The study's chief conclusion on negative emissions "is hardly new or surprising or controversial," said Michael Mann, a Penn State climate scientist who was not involved in the study. "That's well known."
"But the fact that it's being publicized prior to peer review and submitted in a legal case "will certainly raise eyebrows about whether or not this breaches the firewall many feel should exist wherein policy agenda should not influence the way that science is done," he said.
Typically, scientific papers are subject to peer review when they're submitted. If journal editors and outside commenters have any questions or concerns, the authors revise their work to address them before publication."
"For this paper, scientists and others can now submit comments online and Hansen's team must respond."
Killing all humans...that’s what they want
And the climate will still change
When liberals adopt the lifestyle they are suggesting, BEFORE it is required of everyone else, THEN they deserve being heard and we can have a discussion...BUT....
Yup, the liberals will have to accept that their only hope of survival is world war, petulance and disease to dramatically reduce the earth’s population of breathers.
Who paid for this “study?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.