#NeverTrumpers: While Hillary is decimating America, they can shriek ‘Don’t blame us!”

Canada Free Press ^ | 05/05/16 | Dan Calabrese

[Sean_Anthony]

Because as long as they're not held responsible, the nation's demise is apparently just fine

As far as the #NeverTrump crowd is concerned, Hillary’s election is apparently a done deal. It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy if ever there was one, but they just know Donald Trump can’t possibly beat her, and they wouldn’t help him do it in any event because Trump is so icky to them.

Ask them about this, and they will offer elaborate justifications for why Hillary’s election is not their fault! Here’s Brandon Craig at the Reformed Layman going to quite the lengths to explain why a non-vote or a third-party vote by an otherwise conservative voter is not really a vote for Hillary:

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Add this one to the list:

;)

[kingu]

Kind of early to be having buyer’s remorse isn’t it? Now that you trumpets have succeeded in nominating a unelectable candidate, you’re allready trotting out the blame card.

Amazing how Trump is always characterized as having no chance of all of winning - no chance of winning a state, no chance of winning the nomination, and now no chance of winning the general.

As for 'buyer's remorse' - McCain and Romney. Comparing them to Trump, I'm extremely well satisfied with the presumptive nominee. I'll certainly have FAR less vomit coming up in the back of my throat pushing him.

As for his chances in the general, again, McCain couldn't manage to beat a neophyte politician, and Romney couldn't beat Obama even after a disastrous first term.

If the election is a blow out, I'm pretty sure that will merely match Romney's loss.

[BigEdLB]

[Salgak]

Thank you for making my case. . .

We’re not the enemy, but you treat us as such.

It’s going to be a banner year for the Libertarians. . .

[Redleg Duke]

Oh, the “Principled Conservative”, keeping Liberalism alive for the past 34-years!

[italianquaker]

People have said and I was one of them who wouldn’t vote for Trump but now will. That being said the same argument about Hillary winning was used for people not voting for Cruz, Rubio, Bush etc if they won the nomination

[tet68]

Unelectable??? Have you not been paying attention?

[showme_the_Glory]

So tell us who do you pick? Hillary? It is your choice but you’d be on the wrong website.

[kiryandil]

Now that you trumpets have succeeded in nominating a unelectable candidate, you’re allready trotting out the blame card.

Trump is going to win DESPITE your ilk, #NeverTrumper. :)

[mkjessup]

Kind of early to be having buyer’s remorse isn’t it? Now that
you trumpets have succeeded in nominating a unelectable
candidate, you’re allready trotting out the blame card.

Oh don't be a Hiro, chill out with some unique and mellow sounds:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyk7rR-VcGQ

[Luircin]

Thank you for making my case. . .

We’re not the enemy, but you treat us as such.

It’s going to be a banner year for the Libertarians. . .

***

WE’RE not the enemy, but what I see is you treating us with nothing but spite.

What did you expect!?

[stephenjohnbanker]

“Kind of early to be having buyer’s remorse isn’t it? Now that you trumpets have succeeded in nominating a unelectable candidate”

When Trump wins in Reagan-like LANDSLIDE can we all pee on your big toe ?

[ObozoMustGo2012]

Here's your box....

[caww]

I don’t buy that Trump would even by accident nominate a conservative SCOTUS Justice.... Even just a little pushback from the Democrat majority in the Senate will get him to fold and nominate a “moderate”.

[miss marmelstein]

Cruz didn’t get the nomination and Cruz wouldn’t have won over Hillary. I’m sorry about that but it’s true.

[Fresh Wind]

#CryBabyCry

[caww]

There’s several I’m hearing from concerned who voted for Trump....he’s making them skittish as he moves hard left, but it’s late in the game now....he’s expected to reach the magic number and be the nominee, so he’s going to appeal to the left...while at the same time he has to stabilize his base....not so sure he can do that....especially since he also has to unite people. He’s got a tall order on his plate now coupled with preparations for the general he should have had in place somewhat a year ago but doesn’t....and who will sign on that he needs to sign on????

[goldstategop]

Stupid is as stupid does.

Conservatives who vote for Hillary deserve everything they get and then some.

And they have no right to complain about her decisions.

Their vote put her in office.

So chew on that, #NeverTrumpers.

[Blue Jays]

Would we prefer a maniacal President Hillary Clinton nominates four (possibly five) SCOTUS judges, instead?

Even if we have a majority in the House and the Senate, the court of public opinion would paint us as "obstructionists" and we would get clobbered in mid-term elections.

Our nation is far better having Donald Trump nominating the SCOTUS replacements instead of her.
Even if he is not "pure" enough for some observers on some topics.

[catnipman]

Ah, now i see the new strategy for the pro-hillary trolls to avoid riding the lightening bolt: morph into Concern Trolls!