Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ad Featuring James Dobson Says Ted Cruz’s Wife Will be the “Very First Pro-Life First Lady”
lifenews.com ^ | Mar 11, 2016 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 03/12/2016 1:17:14 AM PST by Sun

“His wife, Heidi, will be the very first pro-life first lady,” Dobson says in the TV ad, in which he also endorses Ted Cruz for president.

The Federalist writer Gary Bauer said that his sources tell him that Ted Cruz’s wife, Heidi, also is strongly pro-life.

(Excerpt) Read more at lifenews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: americanunion; cfr; cruz; goldmansachs; heidicruz; nwo; prolife; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Sun

Oh good

When trade is gone and illegals have all the jobs and are building mosques I am sure they will agree with you


61 posted on 03/12/2016 5:36:50 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carry me back

This evangelical is proud to support Trump.

He’s not a perfect conservative, nor does he claim to be one. But he’s the only one willing and able to take on the corrupt establishment, and I know that God can use even a flawed individual to carry out His will if He sees fit.


62 posted on 03/12/2016 5:44:15 AM PST by Cato in PA (Resist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: newfreep; wardaddy; Sun


63 posted on 03/12/2016 5:47:00 AM PST by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Heidi may be pro life, but she’s not pro raising her own kids, with her live-in surrogate mommy raising then for her so she could work 80 hour weeks.


64 posted on 03/12/2016 5:47:11 AM PST by Suz in AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
Martha Washington begs to disagree!

Martha Washington would not have been pro-life by any contemporary definition of the term, though she would have been in her own mind.

It isn't until the rise of obstetrics as a science in the late 1800s that the perception of fetal development changes. The common perception before that was that a fetus wasn't alive until it began being felt in the womb, meaning the baby was kicking--in fact, the term for the kicking was "quickening," which is an old-fashioned way for saying "coming alive."

As late as 1860, the ratio of abortions/pregnancies was the same as it was in the late 1900s. As scientists, and therefore doctors, begin to realize that the zygote is alive from the moment of conception, it is this knowledge that gives rise to the anti-abortion movement of the late 1800s, which was further supported by feminists who saw abortion as a way men could have their way with women without consequences. By 1910, most states had anti-abortion laws, and while abortion never goes away, it greatly diminishes as a %age of pregnancies, at least until the rise of misandrous feminism in the 1950s, leading to the rise of abortions in the 1960s and beyond.

Historians who are more expert than I (which would not be difficult) would have to weigh in on whether any of the First Ladies of the era from 1910-1960 were anti-abortion/pro-life in the contemporary sense: I would guess that the best possibilities would be Helen Herron Taft, Grace Goodhue Coolidge, Bess Truman, and Mamie Eisenhower.

65 posted on 03/12/2016 5:50:18 AM PST by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

Do you share that distaste for all working mothers? Or is your distaste more selective? Is it her husband? Her employer? Just those who have live in nannies?


66 posted on 03/12/2016 7:52:11 AM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Very nice! Thank you for posting!


67 posted on 03/12/2016 10:06:42 AM PST by mlizzy (America needs no words from me to see how your decision in Roe/Wade has deformed a great nation. -MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
"So metrosexual that a foam-whipped latte is too masculine for him."

How did this thread jump from Cruz to Rubio? ;-)

68 posted on 03/12/2016 10:15:18 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Baldwin77

Sometimes presidents ARE affected by their wives, like President Ford. He basically said that he was pro-”choice” because of his wife, because his wife was a woman.

When my husband and I met, we were both STRONGLY pro-life. Often people of the same value system are attracted to each other.


69 posted on 03/12/2016 8:02:12 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: matginzac

Before Roe v. Wade, our country wasn’t killing over one million unborn children each year.

That’s why we need TED CRUZ, who will pick the best judges.


70 posted on 03/12/2016 8:06:09 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy

You are welcome.


71 posted on 03/12/2016 8:10:09 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Sun
“His wife, Heidi, will be the very first pro-life first lady,”

So Martha Washington was pro-baby killing?

News to me.

72 posted on 03/12/2016 8:11:58 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sun
Everyone was pro-life in Martha Washington’s time. They didn’t suck out babies, burn them to death with saline or rip them apart back then.

Incorrect.

There were numerous ways to "bring on menses" as they termed it. They were commonly known and used more often then people want to believe.

And let's not even get into the outright infanticide that took place.

73 posted on 03/12/2016 8:15:16 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Before Roe v. Wade, our country wasn’t killing over one million unborn children each year.

That’s why we need TED CRUZ, who will pick the best judges.


74 posted on 03/12/2016 8:21:51 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Sun

The same guy who picked John Roberts?


75 posted on 03/12/2016 8:36:17 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear; All

I thought Bush picked John Roberts, as well as Alito. :)

If you don’t even know who picked our judges, don’t vote. President Cruz won’t be able to pick judges until 2017.


76 posted on 03/12/2016 9:02:14 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: All

So who do you want selecting our judges?

Do you want DONALD TRUMP, the man who repeatedly says Planned Parenthood does some good things, even though PP had performed over 333,000 abortions in one year?

Or do you think TED CRUZ would be better who:

“Published on Jun 14, 2014
Senator Ted Cruz of Texas stands with Priests for Life in our lawsuit against the HHS Mandate of the President Obama administration. On May 8, 2014, while oral arguments were heard in the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, the second most influential Court in the United States, there was a Rally for Religious Freedom on its steps in support of religious non-profits. ....”

excerpt https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FP1l8hhQEAU&feature=youtu.be


77 posted on 03/12/2016 9:15:23 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Amen


78 posted on 03/14/2016 11:46:07 AM PDT by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Sun
And your thinking would be wrong.

Presidents nominate candidates but they rely on other people to pick them. Cruz was the one who picked John Roberts.

Take your own advise.

79 posted on 03/15/2016 10:50:40 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

lol, If you think Ted Cruz picked George Bush’s candidates for him, you must also think Cruz picked Alito.

I bet you canNOT show us an excerpt and link to show Cruz picked John Roberts.


80 posted on 03/15/2016 1:38:38 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson