Posted on 09/05/2015 8:26:46 AM PDT by John Semmens
Kim Davis, the Kentucky county clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, was led away in shackles after U.S. District Judge David Bunning ordered her to be held in jail until she agrees to comply with his orders.
Bunning justified the harsh treatment calling "contempt of court among the most serious offenses against the rule of law in this country. The humiliation of shackles and the open-ended nature of the incarceration is needed to strike fear into both Ms. Davis and others who night contemplate challenging our authority."
The judge belittled Davis' contention that her natural right to freedom of religion was being infringed, saying that "the idea of natural law superseding court authority would be a dangerous precedent. The US Constitution firmly establishes the courts as the ultimate arbiter of justice. Government officers at all levelsfederal, state, and localcannot refuse to carry out what a court directs them to do. Likewise, any statute or ordinance that is incompatible with a court's ruling must be swept aside."
if you missed any of this week's other semi-news/semi-satire posts you can find them at...
http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,179641.0.html
The judge belittled Davis’ contention that her natural right to freedom of religion was being infringed>>>>>>>>>>>>
We are back to Jim Crow only its against Christians, not black folk.If it keeps up, the Tree of Liberty will be watered.
This ain’t funny anymore.
This isn’t semi-satire. Dumb Bunning actually did say that natural law cannot be used in opposition to court will.
Are those real quotes?
“The judge belittled Davis’ contention that her natural right to freedom of religion was being infringed, saying that “the idea of natural law superseding court authority would be a dangerous precedent.”
God is not mocked .
I would NOT want to be sitting in his shoes
It’s satire but he really did say something about not having to follow natural law
The mere fact that the loving couple after “waiting 11 years” could not drive to the next county to apply for their license should in no way be attributed to their hatefulness or vindictiveness or disregard of their fellow citizens. Nor should the exclusion of an elected county clerk on the basis of her religious beliefs be regarded as setting up a religious test for holding office. Nor should this this unprecedented action of acknowledged severity be considered cruel and unusual punishment; after all, bakers in Colorado(?) have already been fined more than $100,000 for not baking a cake readily available elsewhere and other persons’ livelihoods have been shut down under similar circumstances, so the sky’s the limit on enforcement here. It’s good for a judge to really be able to sink his teeth into somebody’s flesh sometimes.
Here is his quote
The idea of natural law superceding this courts authority would be a dangerous precedent indeed, said Judge David L. Bunning
Ok, thanks.
You can find his original quote here
The idea of natural law superceding this courts authority would be a dangerous precedent indeed, said Judge David L. Bunning
The sad truth this satire is almost what he said and did
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.