Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Would Have Happened if Germany Had Invaded the U.S. During World War II?
Slate ^ | August 2, 2015 | By Quora Contributor

Posted on 08/02/2015 7:44:26 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

Invading the North American mainland can be safely left in the realm of bad Hollywood films. And that's even today, with larger ships, jet cargo aircraft, and more people. While it makes for a great strategy, in the end, it's just a nonstarter. Why?

The Germans had no forward base in the New World. If they had seized Iceland, any of the French protectorates in the Caribbean, or northern South America, then an invasion, while still a stretch, could have been conceivable. Without forward bases to deploy to and from, an invasion isn't going to happen.

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...


TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: france; germany; russia; unitedkingdom; ww2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-225 next last
To: Paleo Conservative
Another problem with the invasion of the Soviet Union was the delay caused by Hitler rescuing Mussolini from the latter's disastrous moves in Greece, Albania, and Yugoslavia. Had the Nazi invasion started on May 15, 1941, rather than June 22, it is possible that the Wehrmacht could have achieved many of its objectives prior to the onset of the Russian winter. It also would have given German industry additional time to properly equip the military against the harsh conditions.

Churchill reportedly said, when an aide reminded him that Italy would fight on the Axis side during the war, "It's only fair. We had them last time." Combined with Italian disasters in North Africa,a region about which Nazi ideology or German goals had no particular interest, Churchill's sarcasm was prescient.

181 posted on 08/03/2015 9:26:14 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: kabar; AppyPappy
No doubt and it forced the Germans to move more forces to the Eastern front from the Western front and Germany.

And don't forget, more Germans surrendered in North Africa than surrendered in Stalingrad.

182 posted on 08/03/2015 9:29:47 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.
Another problem with the invasion of the Soviet Union was the delay caused by Hitler rescuing Mussolini from the latter's disastrous moves in Greece, Albania, and Yugoslavia. Had the Nazi invasion started on May 15, 1941, rather than June 22, it is possible that the Wehrmacht could have achieved many of its objectives prior to the onset of the Russian winter.

I read a book, Bodyguard of Lies years ago pointing out that it was no accident that the Yugoslavs attacked the Germans in May 1941. The British knew all about Operation Barbarosa from their Ultra intercepts of the German Enigma encoded messages. Churchill wanted the Yugoslavs to bait the Germans into moving into Yugoslavia to delay the invasion of the Soviet Union.

183 posted on 08/03/2015 9:47:34 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

If Germany had attacked the US in 1939 before we got our war legs under us, we would have been defeated. As it was the nation was very pacifist and isolationist.


184 posted on 08/03/2015 9:48:44 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
If Germany had attacked the US in 1939 before we got our war legs under us, we would have been defeated.

No way.

185 posted on 08/03/2015 9:49:46 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

We didn’t have the arms to defeat Germany. It takes more than attitude to kill an invading army.


186 posted on 08/03/2015 9:51:48 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

I wouldn’t say we were Pacifist at all, not like “Hippy” Pacifist, Isolationists just thought it wasn’t our business.

But I guarantee if the Germans came after us, there would have been no Pacifism. Our industry would have ramped up on a dime, the Germans at best could have gained a beachhead or two, but they would have been eventually routed.


187 posted on 08/03/2015 9:52:23 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

And there would have been a cold war too. But with the German Reich instead of the USSR.


188 posted on 08/03/2015 9:55:55 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

A very good point. Hitler sacrificed a lot of troops to bad decisions. Having the Italians as an ally didn’t help.


189 posted on 08/03/2015 10:11:03 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Wow, the fact that the USN would have had to operate out of California ESCAPES you. Thank God you are not a military tactician

I spent 8 years as a naval officer including a year in Vietnam and 8 months off the coast aboard an LPH with Marines who launched attacks against the VC and NVA. I do understand how the military and the Navy operate in wartime.

There was no way the Japanese could hold Hawaii even if our forces operated initially from the West Coast. They weren't capable of the logistics. And there would be no point doing it. US carriers and subs would make it impossible.

190 posted on 08/03/2015 10:15:40 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Go digging into NAZI movement within Mexican elite circles prior to WW2. Newspaper and radio networks were infiltrated for espousing propaganda. An embargo of electronic spares (transmitter tubes) and other equipment curtailed the trend.


191 posted on 08/03/2015 10:33:57 AM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Not impressed I was Naval Officer too. The Japanese maintained logistics in the Aleutian Islands for 3 years EXPLAIN THAT?


192 posted on 08/03/2015 10:43:34 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: central_va
I wasn't trying to impress you. My expertise is logistics, which wins wars. Were you in the US Navy or some other country's navy? Your comments don't reflect any real understanding of how nation's project power and the logistics required.

The Japanese maintained logistics in the Aleutian Islands for 3 years EXPLAIN THAT?

A small Japanese force occupied the islands of Attu and Kiska, but the remoteness of the islands and the difficulties of weather and terrain meant that it took nearly a year for a far larger U.S./Canadian force to eject them.

A battle to reclaim Attu was launched on May 11, 1943 and completed following a final Japanese banzai charge on May 29th. On 15 August 1943, an invasion force landed on Kiska in the wake of a sustained three-week barrage, only to discover the Japanese had abandoned the island on July 29th.

The Japanese occupied the islands beginning on 3 June 1942. They were pushed out in August 1943 How do you GET to three years?

Do you realize how close Attu and Kiska are to Japan? It is no great feat for Japan to support a small contingent on these remote islands. It is only 2,571 miles from Japan. After the battle of the Komandorski Islands, the Japanese could only supply the small garrison using submarines. Occupying two remote islands in the Pacific is a far cry from invading Hawaii or the US mainland.


193 posted on 08/03/2015 1:37:18 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Funny thing you think like the Japaneses did which led to ruin. If the roles were reversed The USA would not have made that mistake, they would have taken Hawaii while the taking is good.


194 posted on 08/03/2015 2:23:03 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Maybe a more likely scenario would have been promoting conflict in Latin America. That could have forced the US to commit more forces to this hemisphere. With time, meddling in South America might even have given the Germans their forward base.

There was support for Germany, particularly among ethnic Germans and Italians. Also, a lot of Latin Americans who should have known better were anti-US, or impressed with German achievements, or strongly attracted to European intellectual trends.

I guess we were fortunate that what we later called the Third World wasn't that restless in the 1940s.

195 posted on 08/03/2015 2:29:26 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Funny thing you didn't answer my question. Where did you get the three years from?

If the roles were reversed The USA would not have made that mistake, they would have taken Hawaii while the taking is good.

You mean if the US had conducted a surprise attack on Japan, a day that will live in infamy? Japan could never have held Hawaii and taking and occupying it would have required tens of thousands of troops. Hawaii had 422,000 people in 1940. It comprises hundreds of islands spread over 1,500 miles. It has 750 miles of coastline.

How many people would it have taken to seize the island and occupy it? What naval force would be required to supply the occupying troops with bombs and bullets and beans? How would they protect their suppliy lines and what kind of naval assets would be required? The US was mobilizing its forces and still had carriers. The occupation of Hawaii would have been a military debacle.

196 posted on 08/03/2015 2:41:53 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
If Germany would have attacked us in '39 the same response would have been seen after Pearl Harbor.

What were they going to attack us with?

197 posted on 08/03/2015 2:55:30 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: kabar
I wasn't trying to impress you. My expertise is logistics, which wins wars. Were you in the US Navy or some other country's navy? Your comments don't reflect any real understanding of how nation's project power and the logistics required.

I know your comment was not directed to me, but thought I'd share this.

Good generals study tactics....great generals study logistics.

Germany and Japan found that out the hard way.

198 posted on 08/03/2015 2:58:46 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
A jet plane were demonstrated for Hitler in the 30’s but he dismissed the whole idea.

Like I said, Hitler was an idiot.

199 posted on 08/03/2015 4:25:37 PM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: kabar

How did Japan occupy the Philippines?


200 posted on 08/03/2015 4:26:48 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson