Read “Pharaohs and Kings: A Biblical Quest” by David M. Rohl.
He says Dudimose.
Rohl agrees with Velikovsky that the Pharaoh of the Exodus was the one listed at the end of the Middle Kingdom in the surviving versions of Manetho’s king list. Rohl’s work, like that of Peter James et al, grew out of the breakdown of the attempted Glasgow Chronology, itself cooked up by the Society for Interdisciplinary Studies because, well, IMHO, because Velikovsky was a Jew and a catastrophist. That’s odd in a way, because the SIS also has an interest in catastrophism, despite being based in the land of the uniformitarian Church of Darwin.
Scarab in the Dust: Egypt in the Time of the Twenty-First Dynasty by Martin Sieff
http://www.starways.net/lisa/essays/scarab.html
The Libyans in Egypt: Resolving the Third Intermediate Period by Martin Sieff
[snip] My model also invalidates the original Glasgow scheme of things for the Third Intermediate Period, whereby the Twenty-Second Dynasty was placed c.620-400 B.C., but there should be at least no argument over that, as the Glasgow school leaders themselves, recognizing the impossibility of this solution, have retreated to their James-Rohl model, which gives up Velikovsky’s Hatshepsut-Solomon, Thutmose III-Shishak, and El Amarna-House of Ahab correlations entirely. On my model all these correlations still hold. [/snip]
http://www.starways.net/lisa/essays/slibyans.html
http://www.starways.net/lisa/history_toc.html