[Patton@Bastogne]

your thoughts ?

[2ndDivisionVet]

[Patton@Bastogne]

[SamuraiScot]

With the stroke of a pen, Cruz could outlaw Federal employee unions. It was just an executive order of JFK's that permitted them. No President since has bothered—or dared—to reverse this EO.

It's long overdue. If someone did, it would just be too-bad-so-sad. There down the drain would go millions or billions of dollars, in illegal campaign contributions—both cash and in-kind—to the Evil Party. The Stupid Party has inexplicably failed to take this opportunity.

[arthurus]

He certainly could. The Republicans ratified the precedent when they gave the president power to change laws or make new ones. Without an Article ̀ convention and it's success, that is where we are. We have to try to elect the person most apt to get goodies for our side.

[CharlesOConnell]

According to judicial scholar Robert Lowry Clinton in 'How the Court Became Supreme', prior to the Civil War, the Executive and the Legislative made primary Constitutional Interpretations, the Court's Constitutional interpretations were primarily concerned with issues about its own operations.

Nixon could have refused to enforce Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton (1973), but he agreed with them.

[hosepipe]

OPEN Season on RINOs has begun... Stag or Doe..
Yearling or newborn.. crippled or strong..

GOOD HUNTING...

[American Constitutionalist]

My thoughts ? I can’t even get my brain wrapped around all this tax code mumbo jumbo political talk.

I do believe that Ted Cruz has the American people’s best interest at heart, he is trust worthy...

[American Constitutionalist]

Abolish the I.R.S.

KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID.

[American Constitutionalist]

I.

R. a TED CRUZ for President 2016 abolish the I.R.S.

Supporter

[RKBA Democrat]

Presidents and members of Congress swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution. Few members of Congress come close to actually doing so and really, none of the Presidents in my lifetime have. Including Reagan. Most view it as a game of passing as many laws or executive orders that they personally agree with and hoping that the unelected judiciary will let them get away with it. And for the most part, the judiciary does.

So yes, a President who was actually interested in upholding his or her oath could do a great deal of good. That would also be a once in a century President.

[Cheerio]

The RATS and Obama set the precedent for the use of "Prosecutorial Discretion" with his unconstitutional AMNESTY so IF AND WHEN the Grand Old Party can win a WH seat, all they have to do is grow a pair. Who is gonna argue against it?