Posted on 03/30/2015 5:08:37 AM PDT by HomerBohn
The further I travel down this rabbit hole, the more I feel divorced from the good conservative people that I choose to call my own. I hold some stories back from our readers. My thought is that people have a hard enough time embracing the basic fact that our government is corrupt on both sides of the aisle. If you knew how corrupt I thought these people really were, I feel like you’d rush to the phone and soon bad men would show up to haul me off in a straight jacket.
Do they still do that?
Regardless, today I want to show you something that might leave you questioning everything around you.
Welcome to my world.
In 1975 a representative named Joe Bingham introduced an amendment to remove the “natural born citizen” constitutional requirement to become President.
Why is that important?
Because it was not until almost 30 years later that the issue would be addressed again. And it was not addressed only once, but multiple times. This is all part of congressional record.
Remarkably, it just so happened to coincide with the meteoric rise of a man named Barack Obama who currently sits in the People’s House.
I am about to share with you a brilliant piece of research from the Article II Political Action Committee. After reading it the foremost question on my mind is, “If the natural born citizen definition only requires one citizen parent then why did they seemingly try so hard to change the law for Barack Obama?”
There are multiple links to official congressional documents throughout, contained in the research below, so I would urge you to draw your own conclusions.
But from my point of view this research either strongly, or at least partly, validates the following conclusions: 1.Barack Obama was hand-picked to be President. 2.Some members of Congress, on both sides, understood that Obama was not “natural born” and tried to pass laws to pave the way for his arrival. 3.In the end they used a deflection tactic to shine light on John McCain’s eligibility status, hoping that Obama’s own status would not be brought into question.
It appears to have worked.
Below is a lengthy excerpt from “Article II Facts” hosted on the site of the Article II Political Action Committee. If you like what you read, I would encourage you to consider a donation to their cause.
Let’s take a trip back through recent history:
Attempts to redefine or amend Article II “natural born Citizen” Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
The effort to remove the natural-born citizen requirement from the U.S. Constitution actually began in 1975 – when Democrat House Rep. Jonathon B. Bingham, [NY-22] introduced a constitutional amendment underH.J.R. 33: which called for the outright removal of the natural-born requirement for president found in Article II of the U.S. Constitution – “Provides that a citizen of the United States otherwise eligible to hold the Office of President shall not be ineligible because such citizen is not a natural born citizen.”
Bingham’s first attempt failed and he resurrected H.J.R. 33: in 1977 under H.J.R. 38:, again failing to gain support from members of congress. Bingham was a Yale Law grad and member of the secret society Skull and Bones, later a lecturer at Columbia Law and thick as thieves with the United Nations via his membership in the Council on Foreign Relations.
Bingham’s work lay dormant for twenty-six years when it was resurrected again in 2003 as Democrat members of Congress made no less than eight (8) attempts in twenty-two (22) months, to either eliminate the natural-born requirement, or redefine natural-born to accommodate Barack Hussein Obama II in advance of his rise to power. The evidence is right in the congressional record…
1. On June 11, 2003 Democrat House member Vic Snyder [AR-2] introduced H.J.R 59: in the 108th Congress – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.” – Co-Sponsors: Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14]; Rep Delahunt, William D. [MA-10]; Rep Frank, Barney [MA-4]; Rep Issa, Darrell E. [CA-49]; Rep LaHood, Ray [IL-18]; Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4].
2. On September 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 67: – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the office of President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]
3. On February 25, 2004, Republican Senator Don Nickles [OK] attempted to counter the growing Democrat onslaught aimed at removing the natural-born citizen requirement for president in S.2128: – “Natural Born Citizen Act – Defines the constitutional term “natural born citizen,” to establish eligibility for the Office of President” – also getting the definition of natural born citizen wrong. – Co-sponsors Sen Inhofe, James M. [OK]; Sen Landrieu, Mary L. [LA]
4. On September 15, 2004 – as Barack Obama was about to be introduced as the new messiah of the Democrat Party at the DNC convention, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] introduced H.J.R. 104: – “Constitutional Amendment – “Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office.” – No co-sponsors.
5. Again on January 4, 2005, Rep John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 2: to the 109th Congress – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the Office of President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]
6. Rep Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] tries again on February 1, 2005 in H.J.R. 15: – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office.” – No Co-Sponsor
7. On April 14, 2005, Rep Vic Snyder [AR-2] tries yet again with H.J.R. 42: – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4]
8. All of these efforts failing in committee and the 2008 presidential election looming with an unconstitutional candidate leading the DNC ticket, Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO] tries to attach the alteration to a military bill in S.2678: on February 28, 2008 – “Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act – Declares that the term “natural born Citizen” in article II, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution, dealing with the criteria for election to President of the United States, includes any person born to any U.S. citizen while serving in the active or reserve components of the U.S. armed forces.” – Co-Sponsors DNC Presidential candidate Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY]; DNC Presidential candidate Sen Obama, Barack [IL]; Sen Menendez, Robert [NJ]; Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] – (This was the first effort to also assure that GOP Presidential candidate Sen. John McCain [AZ] would be cleared to run against the DNC primary victor.)
From June 11, 2003 to February 28, 2008, there had been eight (8) different congressional attempts to alter Article II – Section I – Clause V – natural born citizen requirements for president in the U.S. Constitution, all of them failing in committee — All of it taking placing during Barack Obama’s rise to political power and preceding the November 2008 presidential election.
In politics, there are no coincidences… not of this magnitude.
Finally on April 10, 2008, unable to alter or remove the natural born citizen requirement to clear the way for Barack Obama, the U.S. Senate acts to shift focus before the election, introducing and passing S.R.511: – declaring Sen. John McCain a “natural born citizen” eligible to run for and hold the office of president. There was never any honest doubt about McCain, the son of a U.S. Navy Commander. The Sponsor of the resolution is Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO]
S.R.511 States that John Sidney McCain, III, is a “natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States. S.R511 passed by a 99-0 unanimous consent of the Senate, with only John McCain not voting. The basis was – “Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens;” – a condition not met by Barack Hussein Obama II. – Co-Sponsors DNC Presidential candidate Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY]; DNC Presidential candidate Sen Obama, Barack [IL]; Sen Leahy, Patrick J. [VT]; Sen Webb, Jim [VA]; Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] (They had made certain that John McCain would run against Barack Obama)
However, in the McCain resolution is also this language – “Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States; – Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;”
The U.S. Constitution is not a dictionary. The definition of “is” is not in the constitution either. Yet this is the text that would later be issued in Congressional Research Service talking points memos distributed to members of congress, to protect an individual that all members of congress know and understand to be an “unconstitutional” resident of the people’s White House – Barack Hussein Obama II.
Once again, as the political left was unable to alter the U.S. Constitution by way of legitimate constitutional process, they resorted to altering the constitution via precedent setting, in short, knowingly electing and getting away with seating an unconstitutional president in order to alter Article II requirements for the office via breaking those constitutional requirements.
The press would not ask any questions and the American people were already too ill-informed of their constitution to know or too distracted by daily life to care. The press would provide the cover, swearing to the lies of an unconstitutional administration put in power by criminal actors focused only on their lofty political agenda of forever altering the American form of government.
The people would be caught up in a steady diet of daily assaults on their individual freedom and liberty and overlook the most obvious constitutional crisis in American history, the seating of an unconstitutional and anti-American president. [SOURCE CREDIT]
There you have it. Make of this what you will.
It brings about many questions for me.
Would people like Claire McCaskill and Hillary Clinton really come to John McCain’s aid if they did not have an ulterior motive?
Why were people like Inhofe, Issa, and Rohrabacher either sponsoring or co-sponsoring these pieces of legislation? After all, these men have been three of Obama’s biggest critics. We have heard lots of threats and promises from them but have seen no results. Could it be that these men are just more shining examples of “all bark and no bite”? (See Definition of “Smoke and Mirrors“)
If it is true that the definition of “natural born citizen” only involves having one citizen parent then why all the fuss?
Obama, questionable Hawaii birth certificate and all, met the requirement of one American citizen parent. Maybe the truth is that it takes more than that and Congress knows it.
So why was nothing ever done?
Keep searching and settle for nothing less than the truth.
You hit the nail directly on the head. AMERICANS DON’T CARE!! As long as free money, free stuff, for sitting on their lazy, good for nothing, drug filled, alcohol slushed bodies, are fulfilled, free for nothing, and now the muzzies being brought in to pile on top of the lazy good for nothings, you have what we have today. What was Obama’s vote, 52%?? That was then. It will be worse next election. The Dims will say that the republicans will take it all away and that will rally them and the illegal vote to defeat who ever the republicans run. I don’t think Ronald Reagan could win today. America is finished. America will never be what it was. If you think it will, you are wrong. America has turned its collective back on God and He is withdrawing His protective hand from us. We are going down. DOWN! AND FAST. The ONLY thing you can do about it is GET RIGHT WITH THE LORD and do it NOW!!! When this mess really starts, really ramps up, riots, more and more government pressure on citizens, the end will come. America will become a totally socialist, muzlim controled, commie styled nation. DONE as founded. I am so glad that my years on this planet is nearly over. I pray for the young because if the LORD does not return in the Rapture of the Church, they will suffer so badly in a nation that they never got to know. The history books are being changed by muslims who run the printing companies, making muzzies the founders and inventors of the Republic. Yup, America is done. Pray for your Deliverance by the LORD above. He is the ONLY way out of this mess.
[Nothing offensive about telling the truth.]
Thanks Lazamatazer but if I had used the word ‘unknowingly’ instead of complacent, I wouldn’t have submitted an ‘abuse’ on myself.
Amen! Good post. Get right with your Maker (God of the Bible) and prepare for His soon coming for you, by Death or by Rapture.
If you can't re-write the Constitution, then rewrite the dictionary.
Re-defining Natural Born Citizen from being the most pure form of citizenship to the most diluted form possible is one of many examples of this strategy and how well it works on a dumbed down, uninterested population.
Oh well...nothing lasts forever.
Apology accepted.
I have long suspected there was something in Issa’s history that keeps him from really pursuing vigorously and intentions the crimes and ineligibility of Obama. Now the lights have been turned on. I have come to believe and often said that there is probably no elected person in the US government who does not have skeletons, knowingly or unknowingly. Bohn’s narrative needs/must be spread across the Nation. I know/realize that such history is meaningless to a vast number of people.
- a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
- by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures.
Or - the “opposition” party rolling over and playing dead.
May I ask what evidence brings you to such a conclusion?
Not trying to start a tempest here, just an honest inquiry.
Why?
Thank you. God bless you and yours also. Keep looking up!!!
BTTT
Why do you write that? Is it just because of the logistics involved, or have you come across a compelling moral reason not to hang them all?
"Why do you write that? Is it just because of the logistics involved, or have you come across a compelling moral reason not to hang them all?"
The statement was made in a logistics sense.
bkmk. bttt.
I do not believe a challenge to obama's citizenship being absent would have survived a SubPreme Court review because the meaning of the term woul dhave been made plain. That is why no court was allowed to let ANY suit brought get a real hearing. ... But just in case, the court was crapped upon by the installation of John Roberts, the completely owned judge.
Sport, the showers would be merciful compared to what is planned for America. If black people realized the evil they are being arranged to carry forward (the starvation and choatic pillaging and slaughter and murder and mass death which is due when the economy is shut down), well, one can hope if black people realized how they being exploited as useful vermin to carry out the last days of The Republic that they would balk now not later when they cannot do anything but raid and murder to keep from starving to deathy.
Bill and Hill are both members of the Trilateral Commission of David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinsky. They know to sit down and shut up when the TC speaksmakes its choice.
I agree with your first sentence. With your entire post actually. I try to warn and alert people but, for the most part, they are not interested. They will find out for themselves soon enough. As for me, old age will probably get me, though I do believe that I will see the the beginning, actually, I believe that we are already in the beginning phrase.
I only have a 32” CRT (tube) TV. I still can’t see all on Kim’s ass. I can see Obama’s on my old 13” Black & White.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.