Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
she was not guilty of committing any crime other than depositing cash in lumps instead of all at once.

She was Structuring. Intentionally trying to evade the reporting requirements for large deposits. So the author is not exactly dealing with the facts here.

3 posted on 03/29/2015 6:53:49 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35; SeekAndFind
She was Structuring. Intentionally trying to evade the reporting requirements for large deposits.

Yeah, the Founding Fathers considered "Structuring" to be one of the few capital crimes in the beginning of the Republic.

Or they didn't have any such "crime" at all - I always forget which one it is...

She ought to see their penny-ante little "felony" and raise it by a number of REAL felonies. :)

10 posted on 03/29/2015 7:06:16 PM PDT by kiryandil (making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35; SeekAndFind
BTW - the same sanctimonious little jerk-offs prosecuting this woman would LOOK YOU IN THE EYE and tell you that Hillary Clinton didn't break a single law with her email server escapades.

If they don't prosecute Hillary, many people will be done with their "laws".

15 posted on 03/29/2015 7:12:13 PM PDT by kiryandil (making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35

Do you not see the Catch 22 situation of avoiding not evading the requlations? What if she made hourly deposits of $200? The regs now seem to be make no deposits of which the govt disapproves


17 posted on 03/29/2015 7:15:06 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35

Who cares if she was. Those laws are useless and immoral


29 posted on 03/29/2015 7:39:42 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35

A crappy law, designed to exert more government control over the People, is a crappy law all the same, no matter how “legal” it is. Next, they might start ticketing cars with over 300 horsepower because they are going slower than they can and might be hiding something - sounds like it doesn’t equate, but at the core principle of the matter, it equates perfectly.


59 posted on 03/30/2015 4:19:23 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35
She was Structuring. Intentionally trying to evade the reporting requirements for large deposits. So the author is not exactly dealing with the facts here.

She made several small deposits which is not illegal.

65 posted on 03/30/2015 6:49:49 AM PDT by BfloGuy ( Even the opponents of Socialism are dominated by socialist ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35
She was Structuring. Intentionally trying to evade the reporting requirements for large deposits. So the author is not exactly dealing with the facts here.

An unjust law should be openly disobeyed. Those who try to enforce it should suffer consequences.

67 posted on 03/30/2015 9:48:48 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & Ifwater the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson