[kiryandil]

BTW - the same sanctimonious little jerk-offs prosecuting this woman would LOOK YOU IN THE EYE and tell you that Hillary Clinton didn't break a single law with her email server escapades.

If they don't prosecute Hillary, many people will be done with their "laws".

[Weirdad]

You are freaking ...

(to put it colloquially, though some of my friends do not let their children call anyone this, because the term should really be reserved for God, if our language was not so deteriorated, but it is)

... AWESOME.

You, and Freepers like you, are one of my favorite things about FR.

Thank you for your continued wisdom and inspiration, not just that comment but over time!

[Mr. Jeeves]

BTW - the same sanctimonious little jerk-offs prosecuting this woman would LOOK YOU IN THE EYE and tell you that Hillary Clinton didn't break a single law with her email server escapades.

Well, that's because laws only exist to help expand the Welfare State, not to limit it in any way. If a tireless defender of redistribution like Hillary Clinton wants to delete a few e-mails, hey, that's her prerogative. But if a white woman (whose son is probably an anti-progressive gun nut) tries to deposit cash, clearly the interests of the Welfare State are potentially at risk. /s