Posted on 03/16/2015 5:42:33 AM PDT by LeoMcNeil
The Hillary Clinton email scandal is now heading into its third week. Hillary has obviously been up to no good throughout this scandal. She admittedly had 30,000 emails deleted without anyone having read them. When you consider that President Nixon was chased from office for 18 minutes of missing tape, you would think that deleting 30,000 emails might at least be viewed with extreme suspicion. Especially so when the former Secretary of State and presumed Presidential candidate won’t let anyone near her email server. The question all along is who leaked the email scandal to the press. This is something Hillary has been able to keep under wraps for six years, why did it suddenly become public now?
Last week Valerie Jarrett appeared on Bloomberg claiming the White House has strict policies about emails remaining on the government’s system. She then droned on about transparency within the administration, clearly insinuating that Hillary alone was responsible for a lack of transparency at the State Department. Jarrett’s interview was quite a good show considering that she and the White House are likely responsible for leaking the email scandal to the press. No one should be surprised, it’s no secret that the Clintons and Obamas hate each other. The Obama people view the Clintons as middle of the road progressives who will play ball with Republicans.It’s always fun to watch the progressives turn on each other, it’s especially fun when the two biggest names in the Democrat Party are at war with each other. It’s entirely possible that the stories being floated about Jarrett over the weekend are straight from the Clinton camp. If so, it’s another example of these two families being at war with each other.
The question is what is the Obama end game? Obviously we know the Clinton end game, Hillary gets elected President. However what’s the Obama end game here? He can’t possible want to destroy Hillary so that a Republican can get elected President. The only Republicans Obama could stomach either have no shot (Christie) or are part of a family that Obama hates as much as the Clinton family (Bush). Obama has thrown Hillary under the bus before, he’s likely done it again this month. What doesn’t make sense is the lack of a backup plan in the Democrat Party in the event of a Hillary implosion. One year from now the nomination will be wrapped up, who does Obama think is going to beat Hillary?
The obvious progressive choices are Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren. Biden is a wildcard, someone who is wildly inappropriate in public with women. Like with Bill Clinton in the 90’s, the feminists put up with it because Biden advances policies they agree with. Warren is a progressive star that the far left has been begging to run for the better part of two years. Maybe Obama can talk her into running. There is one name out there that no one is talking about who may appeal more to the Obama camp than Warren: New Jersey Senator Cory Booker. Booker is a leftist who can appeal to the same inner city black constituency that helped Obama win twice. The Obama team may view Booker as someone who can recreate the Obama magic of 2008, in which case they likely believe that someone like Warren won’t appeal to inner city voters.
The White House must have an alternative to Hillary. If they don’t, they’re all but ensuring a Republican victory in 2016. Based on what we’ve seen from Obama the last six years, there’s no way they’re willing to cede control to the hated Republicans without having a viable Democrat alternative. By destroying Hillary, the White House is creating chaos in the Democrat Party. Progressives always have an end game when they create chaos, their theory for a century has been that the better organized side always comes out victorious when chaos strikes. Obama has someone in mind for 2016, someone who is probably already putting together a campaign team and will be ready to go at a moments notice. Make no mistake though, Obama doesn’t sent Jarrett out to destroy someone like Hillary unless he’s planned his end game. He’s too trained in the art of community organizing, so is Jarrett, to not have his end game mapped out. The question is what will the end game be and when will it become public.
1) She took the DC bar exam and failed.
2) She married Bill Clinton.
3) She moved to Arkansas
4) She passed the Arkansas Bar
She would not return to Washington (to live) for 18 years. It has long been my contention that her disgraceful performance on the Watergate Committee led her to the conclusion that her future in DC was dim. Her best prospect was to latch onto the coat tails of Bill and to ride them to see where it would lead.
Obviously she made the right decision for her career.
Her best hope was always Bill. Hillary isn’t a fool, she could see that Bill was going places. He had all the makings of a rising star and Hillary had to know she didn’t have what it takes. At least not politically, she just isn’t gifted at the political game like Bill is.
Valerie Jarrett Out To Destroy Hillary
Works for me. I just hope Hildabeast gets mad enough to fight back and fight dirty. Let them take each other down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.