Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Cuba Disaster
Leo McNeil ^ | December 18, 2014 | Leo McNeil

Posted on 12/18/2014 5:16:57 AM PST by LeoMcNeil

President Obama declared yesterday the United States would begin a new chapter with Cuba. Obama already began negotiating with Cuba regarding a prisoner swap among with other issues. For years Obama has told Congress he would keep them in the loop regarding Cuba. Predictably Congress had no idea the Obama administration was negotiating with the Communist dictatorship. Yesterday’s announcement came as a surprise to everyone. As with every other negotiation with a hostile foreign power, Obama got completely taken by the Cuban Communists. Obama negotiates from a position of American weakness because he doesn’t believe in American strength. Obama’s flirtations with Cuba are utterly foolish.

Earlier this year Cuba and Russia signed a mutual defense pact. Just last month Russia announced that it was sending long ranger bombers to Cuba. So of course it’s the perfect time to normalize relations with Cuba! Actually, it would be a good time to negotiate a normalization of relations with Cuba. However, not in the manner that Obama is negotiating. The only way the United States should agree to negotiate with Cuba is if they refuse to allow Russian military personnel and equipment in their country. That’s just to negotiate, if Cuba wants to normalize relations with the United States it will have to reduce or eliminate their relations with Russia. That’s how you negotiate with a state like Cuba. Instead Obama has given Cuba everything it wants in exchange for one prisoner.

Part of the problem here is that Obama negotiated with Cuba in secret. Our Cuban policy is half a century old. If we’re going to change our policy it deserves a national debate. Instead, Obama negotiated in secret because he knows the anti-Castro lobby would thwart a change in policy. It’s curious that the President waited until after the midterm elections to announce this. It’s equally as curious that he waited until this point in his presidency to try to change our diplomatic relations with Cuba. Obama avoided Cuba becoming a big part of either the recent mid-term election or the other two elections since he became President. The problem for him is that not only do the Republicans control the House beginning next year, they also hold an 8 seat majority in the Senate. All of his secret negotiations could come to naught if Congress refuses to fund an embassy in Havanna. An even bigger problem could be the confirmation of an ambassador to Cuba. Surely the President doesn’t imagine that will go over well in a Republican Senate.

The problem with negotiating in secret and leaving Congress out of the Cuba decision is that Congress will actually be necessary in order to make substantial changes in our Cuban relations. The American embargo is codified in law passed by Congress. Obviously the embargo is a major issue for the Cubans. President Obama can’t simply eliminate the embargo, it’s part of American law. This President is of course prone to ignore the law or try to rewrite the law via executive order or memorandums. However he cannot negotiate with Cuba an end to the embargo because while he might try to unilaterally suspend the embargo the next President can easily put it back in place. A suspension of the embargo for a year or two isn’t going to satisfy the Castro regime. By leaving Congress out of the initial negotiations, Obama has made it even more difficult to normalize relations with Cuba. Congress is going to be less likely to play along.

After half a century there’s nothing wrong with the United States reevaluating its diplomatic position with Cuba. It’s hardly surprising that a leftist like Obama is the one pushing this. However, even if it is Obama trying to start a debate on Cuba it’s a debate worth having. Obama left the country and Congress out of the debate, which is a major problem. While the Constitution gives the President the duty of deal with foreign powers, he still relies on Congress to fund embassies and policies and he still requires the Senate to confirm ambassadors. Worse, he negotiates from a place of extreme weakness. The United States has a shot to reduce Russian influence in the western hemisphere via Cuba. Instead of trying to normalize relations with Cuba based on that principle, the President ignores Russian military training in Cuba. Why should the United States prop up the Castro regime with Russian planes training in Cuba? Unfortunately our President is more interested in photo ops and historical legacies to be written half a century from now than he is in securing what’s best for the United States.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: communism; cuba; obama; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: LeoMcNeil

You have a lot more confidence in Congress than I do. They will moan and groan and kick dirt around then go along with what Obama wants.


21 posted on 12/18/2014 6:52:59 AM PST by Happy1947
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

The embargo really isn’t all that important. The fact is that other nations trade with Cuba and thus Cubans already have access to American products. American money flows freely into Cuba. The real issue with the embargo and with normalizing diplomatic relations with Cuba is that it will open the country up to billions in American loans. Allowing the Cuban government access to billions in American loans will do little more than keep the Castro regime entrenched and in power.


22 posted on 12/18/2014 7:14:13 AM PST by LeoMcNeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Happy1947

I don’t think Congress will go along with Obama on this issue. Anti-communism and anti-Castro sentiment is still very strong in the GOP. It wouldn’t shock me if the establishment sees this as the opportunity to oppose Obama while supporting his other, more directly negative policies. Cuba could become smoke and mirrors for the GOP.


23 posted on 12/18/2014 7:16:32 AM PST by LeoMcNeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LeoMcNeil

Who would loan Cuba money? They have no means of repaying it.


24 posted on 12/18/2014 7:21:09 AM PST by Daveinyork ( Marbury vs.Madison was the biggest power grab in American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LeoMcNeil

PFL


25 posted on 12/18/2014 7:23:30 AM PST by Batman11 (Obama is not American.. he has no clue what it is to be American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

There is something very superficial about Obama. There’s an amount of intelligence behind Obama but it’s a misdirected intelligence. It’s perhaps one of the negatives of affirmative action, Obama’s been told he’s smart because he offered the “right” perspective on race when he was in school.

When it comes to foreign policy he seems to have a very naive view of how things work. Because he’s likely a narcissist or sociopath he doesn’t understand how other people think. Thus he’s easily taken by sweet talking foreign diplomats who will give him a photo op in exchange for everything they want. Meanwhile Republicans drive him absolutely crazy because they won’t completely cater to him. In any event, Obama isn’t nearly as bright as he thinks he is. The question is whether he’s as evil as conservatives think he is or if he’s actually just woefully naive.


26 posted on 12/18/2014 7:27:19 AM PST by LeoMcNeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LeoMcNeil

“Those who stand for nothing fall for anything.” Alexander Hamilton


27 posted on 12/18/2014 7:33:57 AM PST by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

Who would loan the United States money?


28 posted on 12/18/2014 7:35:14 AM PST by LeoMcNeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Well, no.

The USSR wasn't overthrown, it collapsed.

This due to RR's policy, "We win. They lose."

The USSR was effectively bankrupt when RR walked away from disarmament talks in Reykjavik. Gorbachev recognized he didn't have the $$$ to engage in a new arms race.

Russians were passive observers.

29 posted on 12/18/2014 7:55:21 AM PST by gogeo (If you are Tea Party, the Republican Party does not want you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911

I think the way it is now, if a Cuban reaches the US soil, they can stay... thus the ppl trying to get here in home made boats.. so once this goes thru, all the ppl who get here by obamas decree will be staying.. sorta an amnesty deal for them..


30 posted on 12/18/2014 8:12:40 AM PST by JoanneSD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LeoMcNeil
President Obama can’t simply eliminate the embargo, it’s part of American law.

Yeah....like all the other American Laws he decided to overturn.

31 posted on 12/18/2014 8:30:28 AM PST by spokeshave (He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

If you’re the Cubans though, you’re not going to give up a whole lot in exchange for eliminating the embargo because at best Obama can only guarantee two embargo free years. The next President could easily overturn Obama’s embargo elimination, the Courts could prevent the President from lifting it.

Having said that, based on what Obama’s done so far he appears willing to give the Cubans whatever they want in exchange for nothing.


32 posted on 12/18/2014 8:33:55 AM PST by LeoMcNeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LeoMcNeil

The fed


33 posted on 12/18/2014 8:40:31 AM PST by Daveinyork ( Marbury vs.Madison was the biggest power grab in American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: LeoMcNeil

Any bets banks in Cuba will be the first growth area? got to wash the stuff some place.


34 posted on 12/18/2014 8:45:06 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeoMcNeil

Anyway../..this put a bomb under all the dims 2016 presidential hopefuls.


35 posted on 12/18/2014 8:45:20 AM PST by spokeshave (He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

On some level it makes the GOP’s shot a little better. Florida is almost certainly to go Republican now. Cuban refugees have been drifting from the GOP in recent elections. Obama’s move outraged this group and they’re likely to be brought back into the Republican fold.


36 posted on 12/18/2014 9:08:37 AM PST by LeoMcNeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LeoMcNeil

“The problem with negotiating in secret and leaving Congress out of the Cuba decision is that Congress will actually be necessary in order to make substantial changes in our Cuban relations. The American embargo is codified in law passed by Congress. Obviously the embargo is a major issue for the Cubans. President Obama can’t simply eliminate the embargo, it’s part of American law. “

No problem. The RINOs will just pass whatever Obama says. Just like with Obamacare and amnesty.


37 posted on 12/19/2014 9:59:38 AM PST by yorkiemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yorkiemom

I guess that’s possible. That said, there are a lot of neo-cons in the GOP and they like nothing more than fighting the Cold War and for them Cuba is the last battle in the Cold War. Plus, Obama’s actions put Florida in play and they create an opportunity for Sen. Marco Rubio. I don’t think they’ll cave, at least not completely, on this issue.


38 posted on 12/22/2014 5:45:13 AM PST by LeoMcNeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: LeoMcNeil

I hope you’re right and they have principles on ONE issue. It will be little enough.


39 posted on 12/22/2014 6:47:32 AM PST by yorkiemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: scottteng
"Ronald Reagan showed us that the way to bring down a communist dictatorship was to trade with them thus exposing the people to our way of life causing them to create their own regime change..."

What color is the sky in your world? Ours is blue.

40 posted on 12/22/2014 6:51:58 AM PST by safeasthebanks ("The most rewarding part, was when he gave me my money!" - Dr. Nick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson