Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOVERNOR PALIN, PLEASE RUN AS AN INDEPENDENT IN 2016
FREE REPUBLIC | 11 DECEMBER 2014 | EEE

Posted on 12/11/2014 7:13:59 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist

Governor Palin,

If you or a member of your family is lurking here, please take some time to consider running for President of the United States - as an Independent candidate.

- Only you, Mrs. Palin, can clean up the filthy corruption in Washington D.C. To get rid of the lobbyists and ruling class that penalizes everyday, working Americas while they and their advisors, consultants, and millionaire donors continue to get ever richer.

- Only you can promote using our energy resources, which will in turn create high-paying jobs and rebuild the middle-class of America.

- Only you can secure our borders and stop amnesty, and make our melting pot work its magic once again.

Please begin laying the groundwork for an independent run for President. DO NOT EVEN CONSIDER RUNNING AS A REPUBLICAN. The Republican Party, once again, has betrayed its fellow countrymen. We gave them 2 landslide mid-term elections and they blew it again.

Prepare your presidential run behind the scenes. Start coordinating with state secretaries to get on the ballot ahead of time so there's no dirty tricks when 2016 rolls around. Then announce your candidacy on live television during primetime hours (See if you can rent out the AT&T Stadium in North Texas) on August 29, 2015 - which is your wedding anniversary and will electrify America as it did exactly 7 years ago.

Sincerely yours,

Extremely Extreme Extremist (Real name withheld for obvious reasons)


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: palin; palinwasright; runsarahrun; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last
To: HMS Surprise

What evil can they do, I just told you, they could do what you voted for, end America.

Which do you think the left gets first, the social agenda you voted for, or a 90% reduction in government?

What rationality is there in thinking that eliminating the border, INS, and the Border Patrol leads to a sudden flood of hard right voters who suddenly decide to cut the budget by 90% and doesn’t instead make the left all powerful?


101 posted on 12/11/2014 11:13:49 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: PCPOET7

You are an idiot, I just thought that troll sounded nicer.

P.S. please don’t call yourself a conservative, your anti-Palin trolling puts the lie to that.


102 posted on 12/11/2014 11:16:22 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Obstinate

Form a third party and invite true conservatives in office to join. You will immediately see the rinos voting with the democrats. This will out them. Then, maybe, we can vote them out and replace them with third party candidates.

We tried to run conservatives against them in the primaries. How many did we win? One!


103 posted on 12/11/2014 11:17:07 PM PST by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

OMG.... There is NO border. What the hell are you going on about? Libertarians didn’t take the border down! Republicans and Democrats did! Did you vote for any of those in the last 30 years?


104 posted on 12/11/2014 11:20:51 PM PST by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise

You really don’t know the difference between the political battling we are doing now, and the existing immigration laws and our future chances to regain control over it, versus the immigration policy that you voted for?

You VOTED for completely open borders, not porous borders, or weak borders, “completely open borders” in 1992! You voted to eliminate all border controls, the Border Patrol and the INS, “eliminate them completely” in 1992! You voted for COMPLETE 100% amnesty in 1992! And you voted for completely unrestricted abortion, with zero restraints up to full delivery, IN 1992!

Don’t confuse a party that is weaker than you claim to desire, with a party whose declared purpose for existence is to implement what you claim to oppose with all your heart.

Here is what you voted for in 1992:
“”We welcome all refugees to our country and condemn the efforts of U.S. officials to create a new “Berlin Wall” which would keep them captive. We condemn the U.S. government’s policy of barring those refugees from our country and preventing Americans from assisting their passage to help them escape tyranny or improve their economic prospects.
Undocumented non-citizens should not be denied the fundamental freedom to labor and to move about unmolested. Furthermore, immigration must not be restricted for reasons of race, religion, political creed, age, or sexual preference.
We therefore call for the elimination of all restrictions on immigration, the abolition of the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Border Patrol, and a declaration of full amnesty for all people who have entered the country illegally. We oppose government welfare and resettlement payments to non-citizens just as we oppose government welfare payments to all other persons.””

“”We support the right of women to make a personal choice regarding the termination of pregnancy. We oppose the undermining of the right via laws requiring consent of the pregnant woman’s parents, consent of the prospective father, waiting periods, or compulsory provision of indoctrination on medical risks or fetal development.””


105 posted on 12/11/2014 11:34:43 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: MAD-AS-HELL
 photo yellowkidGif.gif
106 posted on 12/11/2014 11:48:46 PM PST by sparklite2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Obsess much?


107 posted on 12/12/2014 12:03:01 AM PST by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise

Troll much? So far you have pretty much proven that you are not what you say, you appear to have supported what I showed you, you were voting for in 1992, instead of being shocked at learning what you were voting for, or feeling like a fool for it, you defend your voting for that immigration and abortion agenda.

You voted for the most radical immigration position you could.


108 posted on 12/12/2014 12:18:07 AM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

You need a hobby.


109 posted on 12/12/2014 1:31:40 AM PST by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

“Form a third party and invite true conservatives in office to join. You will immediately see the rinos voting with the democrats. This will out them.”

I commented a while back it was really be interesting to see who would leave the GOP and who would stay.

Those leaving would be risking a lot.


110 posted on 12/12/2014 2:11:36 AM PST by Obstinate (Pack the Constitution & build Mayflower II; this place is toast. Going Galt? Going Constitutional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise

A hobby like defending conservatism on a conservative political forum, or a hobby of voting for open borders and full term abortion, by taking your advice?


111 posted on 12/12/2014 2:29:37 AM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Maybe one of these days we will all see that arguing over who runs in the (as usual, next election) is a nice way to pass time, but the disease this country has can’t be won at the voting booth.

The GOP elite and Wall Street types have already chosen who that will be. A bunch of “conservatives” will also run like last time. They will savage each other and run out of dough just like last time.

The country is a falling down road kill. The subversive elements that operate out of normal view are bringing it down.

All anyone has to do is ask themselves what victories for Freedom and the Constitution have been won lately? The more time that passes insures that America is on warp speed to becoming a rotting corpse.

Elections are always the excuse to push the cure down the road and mollify the people.


112 posted on 12/12/2014 4:38:52 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

Palin would be a much better and more well known 3rd party candidate. Ross Perot never wanted to be president, but he did his pal a favor by pretending to be conservative and split the republican votes. Clinton would not have won either race without him...and yet we here about how popular he was. The left’s narrative is NEVER to be believed. Why do you think the left sinks so much money into moderate republican races? If the mods win, they have a comrade, if they lose they have a comrade. That’s a win-win. We need a 3rd party to break away from the moderates who use the dirty tricks from the leftists’ playbook. We need to stop fooling ourselves into thinking that the republican party is going to become conservative or ever really listen to the base. I personally think that Palin would win a lot of women from any party, except the most extreme left. Palin would not enter the race to throw the game to one party or the other. She would be a great candidate, unless she chose Karl Rove, Steve Schmidt, et al to run her campaign, then she might as well stay at home.


113 posted on 12/12/2014 5:15:43 AM PST by Shery (Pray for righteousness to be restored and for the peace of Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican
What gave us Obama? The Media.
114 posted on 12/12/2014 5:29:55 AM PST by Loud Mime (We wanted an Einstein But we got a Frankenstein (h/t Alice Cooper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

No, model trains.


115 posted on 12/12/2014 5:32:48 AM PST by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Shery

I am a big Sarah Palin fan, having followed her before McCain asked her to run with him. I love that woman and respect her greatly.

Her move into the management of politics (instead of the candidacy) is wise. She stays in politics yet does not have to put up with the attacks that a political office invites and protects.

Should she run, I will work for her with all my energies. But I seriously doubt that will happen.

Political campaigns are a dynamic flow. You must look at the voter block and know how conservative or liberal your candidate must be to win in that district. That is why we have rinos. There are areas where a pure constitutionist will not win. I would rather have a rino than a democrat; and yes, there is a difference.

If we want to change politics, we must educate the people. We cannot do that unless we seize the media - - which is where we should put our energies.


116 posted on 12/12/2014 5:41:49 AM PST by Loud Mime (We wanted an Einstein But we got a Frankenstein (h/t Alice Cooper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Obstinate

I would support this provided she doesn’t hold back when slamming her opponents.

Screw the niceties of politics. Tell it like it is. If Hildabeast were her opponent she needs to dredge up the past and force answers. Same goes for McCain, Bush or anyone else the GOP decides to run.

Take no prisoners!


117 posted on 12/12/2014 6:47:13 AM PST by rfreedom4u (Do you know who Barry Soetoro is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Randy Larsen
Ross Perot NEVER had the popularity that Sarah Palin holds.

Nor was Ross Perot as polarizing as Sarah Palin. I love Sarah, and applaud what she's done for our cause. However, there are far too many of us around who took the chance and voted for Ross Perpt. And, there is no dispute that it was his candidacy splitting the vote that ushered in Bill Clinton. Sarah Palin would not only split the vote on the right, it would solidify the vote on the left. You forget, that as much as we love her, the left, and also the media hate her. The only way she could win, is if she were able to secure the Republican nomination, any other course is deadly folly for our side.
118 posted on 12/12/2014 8:14:06 AM PST by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Only you, Mrs. Palin, can clean up the filthy corruption in Washington D.C. To get rid of the lobbyists and ruling class that penalizes everyday, working Americas while they and their advisors, consultants, and millionaire donors continue to get ever richer.

Palin won't be able to clean up anything after she gets her head handed to her in the election and comes in a distant third.

119 posted on 12/12/2014 8:16:56 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
I think it’s more likely that she’s running for senator from Alaska against Lisa Murkowski.

I think it's most likely she isn't running for anything.

120 posted on 12/12/2014 8:23:38 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson