Posted on 11/27/2014 10:22:47 AM PST by Starman417
The Democratic Party has lost big time in the nearly concluded 2014 Congressional elections. Only Louisiana’s runoff election between Mary Landrieu (D) and Bill Cassidy (R) remains undecided.
Cassidy is going to win. Even the Democratic Party realizes this and has decided not to spend any more money on her campaign. This means that Republicans will have 54 Senators as compared to 45 in the outgoing Senate. Republicans also increased the number of House Reps by at least 12 to 244 and the number of Governors by two to 31.
Before the elections, Obama had said, ‘Make no mistake. My policies are on the ballot this fall.’ But what was President Barack Obama’s reaction after the voters clearly rejected his policies? He responded by going more to the left. He is doubling down on those unpopular policies that gave the Democrats such a beating.
One such policy the left wants is amnesty for illegal immigrants. Obama has issued an executive order to allow up to 5 million illegal immigrants to stay in the US.
He had postponed this decision till after the elections for obvious reasons - it is unpopular. But why? Deep down inside, Obama is a radical leftist. Before the elections, he was constrained by the need to keep the Senate in Democratic control. Now that the election is over, he can do what he truly believes in.
The left has been influenced by Marx, who believed that the workingman has no country. A passage from Chapter II of the Communist Manifesto reads:
‘The Communists are further reproached for desiring to abolish countries and nationality.The working men have no country.’A Marxist’s loyalty is not to his country, but to the workers of the world whom he believes are oppressed. That is why so many ‘progressives’ talk about abolishing the border. Granting amnesty is a de facto way of rendering all borders and nationality null and void.
While supporters of open borders are not all Marxists, there is a strong Marxist component among them. One such proponent is Aviva Chomsky, the daughter of notorious linguistic professor Naom Chomsky.
In the final chapter of her book, ‘They take our jobs: And 20 other Myths about Immigration,’ Chomsky wrote:
‘Today’s immigration is structured by contemporary relationships among countries and regions, and by their history of economic inequality. Unequal economic relationships should be changed — not because they lead to migration, but because they lead to human suffering and an unsustainable world. High levels of migration are a symptom of a global economic system that privileges the few at the expense of the many. It could be called capitalism, it could be called neoliberalism, it could be called globalization, it could be called neocolonialism. As long as it keeps resources unequally distributed in the world, you’re going to have people escaping the regions that are deliberately kept poor and violent and seeking freedom in the places where the world’s resources have been concentrated: in the countries that have controlled, and been the beneficiaries of, the global economic system since 1492.’The radical’s loyalty is not to the US. It is to the workers of the world whom they believe to be oppressed by the capitalist class. Inequality of wealth is seen as oppression. The US being one of the wealthiest countries in the world is thus seen as the biggest oppressor. So letting the victims of the oppressor into the country is striking a blow against the biggest oppressor. It may make things worse for Americans to compete with this influx of cheap labor, but that does not matter to someone who feels no loyalty to the US.
During the election campaign for US President in 2008, I detected tell tale signs of this Marxist ideology in then Senator Barack Obama. He initially refused to wear an American flag lapel pin. I then suspected he was signalling to radicals that he feels no loyalty to the US.
Even worse, Obama had been attending the church of Rev Jeremiah Wright for 22 years. The anti-American pastor had been preaching ‘Goddam America’ and that the US was to blame for the 9/11 jihadist attack.
It should also not be forgotten that Obama launched his political career in the home of a radical and terrorist Bill Ayers. Ayers, like so many Marxists, was against the Vietnam War because they wanted Communism to triumph. His association with Ayers was by itself very telling. In his heart of hearts, Obama is a Marxist. Another clue of his inner Marxism was the incident involving ‘Joe the Plumber.’
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...
Exactly!!
Neo-marxist TREASON - continuous, in-your-face, agenda-driven, agency-abetted, media-complicit, representative-enabled, ongoing…
C’mon December (Louisiana) & 2016.
More…(thanks FReeper Ray76)...here...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3228600/posts
Very dangerous, because this out of control maniac wants to finish the job of destroying this country before he’s out of office.
I apprehended the “slogan” from a Freepers Tagline...which came from MLK surprisingly...
Today’s progressives aren’t about MLK as you know. I’m not solid on 60s civil rights history, but the few videos I’ve seen of Malcolm X (even him!) made more sense and were more reasonable than pretty much any RAT today.
The degeneration thats occurred across the board...over the past 50 plus years is really REALLY remarkable.
Todays democracks are yesterdays Communists. The Corrupt democrats are Hardcore Communists..the naive ones.... merely Communist Peasants.
My grandfather would not have believed this could ever happen. I doubt my dad would have believed it either. As a matter of fact, Im still having some difficulty believing we LET this happen.
they say "first kill all the lawyers" but I say leave them for second. This is on the leftist teachers and professors.
correction on the great leaders Holiday Propaganda may be found here...
http://i.imgur.com/XhgcH2U.gif
You’re right. The media wouldnt be like they are were it not for the professors!
The way I see it, professors are evil.. Journalists started out misguided but now they’re just evil too.
Amnesty was just a test to see if he lost the MSM cover.
Next year, everything will be Executive Order and it will be hard core VJ plans.
On the contrary, Obama will be circumscribed in what he can do by losing both houses of Congress. He was already reduced to Executive Orders of dubious legality with only one house in Republican hands.
Nothing he does by EO is irreversible. The Congress can limit him and the next President can overturn.
The invasion of Israel because of their immorality lead to the writing of the book of Lamentations. Unless America repents of legalizing immorality, it too will be lamenting and probably won’t exist like other cultures that practice human sacrifice. Why should it?
This assumes that he will step down in two years. That is a big assumption to start with.
I cannot understand how anyone can believe that there is any hope of saving what little remains of America. Remember this anti-American, Marxist, racist little man was elected twice to be the POTUS. The average American only knows if and by whom Kim Kardashian is pregnant - absolutely nothing more ! Someone please correct me if my assessment is wrong. To compound matters, your average GOP-e’s policies differ little, if at all, from the most left leaning members of the Democratics (sic) party. Goodnight and good luck.
"Majority votes of both the Senate and the House can overturn an executive order."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
