Posted on 10/13/2014 10:17:48 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The Army’s top general said Monday that an increase in threats around the world requires that the U.S. rethink plans to cut the size of the American military’s ground force.
The Army agreed – reluctantly — to cut the size of its force to 490,000 under the budget reductions originally approved in 2011. But as a result of subsequent White House-Congress spending battles and military budget reviews, Pentagon leaders said the Army has had to make plans to shrink even further, to 450,000 or even 420,000.
But Gen. Ray Odierno, the chief of staff of the Army, said Monday that even 490,000 may be too small, given recent events such as the rise of militants fighting for Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL, and Moscow’s moves in Eastern Europe....
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...
Thank you.
The Army will be much smaller, soon. Operation United Assistance is now underway.
Just drop them off first and see how they do.
That is a terrible idea.
Different way of thinking with the “me” generation. Even when I was in, i would rather have a volunteer than someone that was forced into it. Even the draftee’s when I joined up were volunteers because they had already reenlisted to stay in. I would rather have an empty rank on my left or right than someone who was forced in. My 2 cents.
And, despite all that, they have to recruit illegal aliens, gays, and women as Rangers.
In that vein, it is worth noting that an ordinary EM who served 4 years during the Vietnam era, gets from the GI Bill $1,500 for education, and $12,000 for a home loan, among other nearly worthless ‘benefits’. So much were they hated.
We still have an Army?
Obama, in an effort to bend over backward in the cause of fairness, doesn’t want the US military to outnumber, say.... Ecuador, Denmark, or Thailand.
That’s true. But it doesn’t mean that I want to celebrate the fags and dykes in our military. In fact, I would love to run them out and wipe out the ignorant F*cks who are fine with the destruction of our military. Of course the only real power I have is to spread the word on FR as even my right to vote in Ohio has been stolen by the leftist fraud from Cleveland. Civil War II is needed in the worst way.
The Obungler will deploy them alright, to be infected with ebola.
The Army is far smaller, yet the number of general officers has increased...that’s where I’d start cutting..
+1 what you said....Too many chiefs, not enough indians.
It would be nice if the rest of NATO honored their obligations for a change rather than relying on the United States to fight all its battles, don’t you think?
Why should the US be forced to maintain a 500K plus standing army AND pay the lions share of the NATO budget each year?
Especially when countries like Turkey openly conspire against our national security interests.
We’re being set up to be clobbered.
“Is there a threat a 420,000 US Army wouldn’t cope with?”
Yes. It’s called China. And it has been going hog-wild gearing up to hit us. Russia is re-arming for a potential clash with the U.S. and Europe, as well. And there is every chance Russia and China will ally in that regard.
obola will make it smaller with Ebola. How many will sign up if they think they’re going to be intentionally exposed.
Today, the US military ( less than 2 million ) has more flag ranks ( and all their staffs) than at the height of WW II, when we had 15 million in uniform..
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/02/18/3299971/food-stamps-military/
I’ve got no problem with them receiving it. I would prefer they were paid better and not need it. We should take the money from those doing nothing for it and give it to those serving our nation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.