Posted on 10/13/2014 10:17:48 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The Army’s top general said Monday that an increase in threats around the world requires that the U.S. rethink plans to cut the size of the American military’s ground force.
The Army agreed – reluctantly — to cut the size of its force to 490,000 under the budget reductions originally approved in 2011. But as a result of subsequent White House-Congress spending battles and military budget reviews, Pentagon leaders said the Army has had to make plans to shrink even further, to 450,000 or even 420,000.
But Gen. Ray Odierno, the chief of staff of the Army, said Monday that even 490,000 may be too small, given recent events such as the rise of militants fighting for Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL, and Moscow’s moves in Eastern Europe....
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...
It doesn’t matter how small it is if the obamites refuse to deploy it.
I agree it is getting smaller and yet at the same time, more female.
And more illegal immigrant, homosexual, transgender, DREAMer and etc...
How is even a 420,000 too small?
In 1984, when I entered service, the Army had double that number. The population of the US at that time was around 220 million. Today, we have around over 310 million. Yes, there have been efficiencies created and improved technology, but, IMHO, we do not have enough people to do the missions assigned to the military. The military is worn out and its equipment needs replacement. More personnel would relieve the burdens of so many already doing multiple deployments.
Obama would rather send welfare checks for people setting on their behinds doing nothing.
A combination of the draft and a good-sized foreign legion might be called for. Every year, fewer of the military aged cohort qualify for service, mostly due to obesity, learning disabilities, drug use and criminal records.
To you, being in the Russian Army, I can see your annoyance at our support for a strong American Army, but it is already too small and was strained during these recent wars.
If there’s going to be a draft, it needs to include women.
Question .......
How much does the average enlisted make?
How much does the average welfare recipient take in?
I know of a lot of welfare cases where they take in more than some in our military. And these welfare sponges do absolutely nothing to take in this taxpayer money other than stink up the place. We’re cutting the wrong people.
There were 787,000 on active duty the day I was sworn-in as Regular Army. That’s not counting the Reserves, DEP, National Guard and so forth.
A brand-new E-1 (private, seaman apprentice, Airman, etc.) makes just over $1,500 a month in base pay. A four star general makes about $20,000 a month. Everyone else is somewhere in between:
http://milpaychart.com/2014-military-pay-chart/
It was well over a million active when I first enlisted.
The draft should begin with those on welfare who refuse to work.
Is there a threat a 420,000 US Army wouldn’t cope with?
But our diversity is our strength!
/s
Rather than me answering your questions as you post them to me one by one, why don’t you just make your statements of what you think.
What size does an active duty Russian soldier want our Army to be.
1,500 sounds like too little pay to me and I can’t see a reason why one can make 20,000 a month at ANY government job. It is not surprising that the general is more loyal to the government than to his troops and mission in this case.
2) Dollar too weak
3) Welfare too high
4) Healthcare falling apart
5) Races clashing
6) Isis too strong
7) Interovirus and Ebola spreading
Gee do you think the Russians might make a move?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.