Huh?
Posted on 10/05/2014 3:26:07 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
Transcript @18:50: Mike Zullo: The press conference was three days away and the 9 code was still not resolved in my mind and we needed to get verification. For two feverish days Jerry Corsi sent his associate and this woman stayed in the lobby of the CDC (in Atlanta) for eight hours a day for two days trying to get the answer to this question. On the third day it was about two and a half hours before the press conference was going to go at that point in time the 9 code at issue was NOT going to be in it. As fate would have it, Attorney Larry Klayman happened to be in Phoenix so he stopped in, wanted to say "Hello" to the Sherrif. Larry Klayman, Larry Klayman's associate, Sherrif Arpaio, myself and Jerry Corsi were all in the conference room when the phone rang from the woman from the CDC, and I have her information who she is and she's NOT a clerk. She's a highly educated individual. Jerry put her on speakerphone. I remember Jerry with his fingers crossed. She confirmed for us that what we were saying and requesting...what the number "9" meant...was in fact what it was! He asked he to repeat it. "Are you saying this "9" in this box yadda yadda yadda means that?" and she said "Yes" and with that verification we put the 9 code back in the press conference.
(Excerpt) Read more at birtherreport.com ...
Number 9? Number 9? ...
...it’s a 6 upside down....and there should be 2 more adjacent to it.
Huh?
SCOTUS would have ruled that it lacks jurisdiction, that eligibility is decided by Congress, sitting in review of ballots from the Electoral College. It’s not up to SCOTUS to judge eligibility, that is a Congressional duty.
OK, thanks. I was only part way through the video.
Please don’t equate Sheriff Arpaio with this crap, whatever it is. He is a decent man who really doesn’t need your tagging him with this bullsh!t!
I see what you did there.
... what did I just read? There’s a lot of words that don’t go together.
Eligibility is not a political question, it is a legal question. Legal questions are decided judicially.
Is this about the Beatles?
What neuro condition? I just found out on Sept. 23rd that I’m epileptic.
I think it means it's been over 9 weeks since anyone from the Cold Case Posse was mentioned in any 'news' source. They're going to be issuing their report really soon...any month now...
It's a constitutional question (not saying that isn't a form of legal question), and SCOTUS has been known to punt constitutional issues as being outside of judicial purview.
Eligibility of Obama would be a real hot potato, and SCOTUS would not want to be in the position of "decider" after getting booed by the glitterati for its Bush v. Gore decision. All it has to do is point to the part of the constitution that implies Congress decides issues of eligibility (20th Amendment).
Last I heard it was going to be in March. I didn’t know that it was 2017.
Oh, I see.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Is7SQO6Ws0g&feature=youtu.be
That's what I was thinking ... Beatles, Revolution 9.
teH bRoWn aCID iS cLEARlY bAck In cIruclatIOm. #9, #9 ... #9 ...
The 20th Amend. says no such thing!
It specifies succession in the event of death(s) or failure(s) to qualify, and in the event neither President or Vice-President are qualified and alive then Congress shall "[declare] who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified." (emphasis added)
Congress does not decide eligibility but either declares, or provides a manner to select, who shall temporarily act as President.
I think you are correct, AGAIN! No links. CCP hibernating for 6 months or more. There is nothing to investigate. BO is a fraud and we all know it. This Birther Report is just a side show. I follow all this stuff and have absolutely no idea what they are talking about. They are not going to explain either.
It sounds like they are still examining the legitimacy of the birth cert and comparing what they have with what once was..the format depending on the year and forms used, or perhaps the selective service card and the postal stamps on it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.