Skip to comments.
Martial Law: Obama Confiscates National Guard Helicopters From All 50 States
Examiner.com ^
| April 14, 2014
| Dave Gibson
Posted on 04/19/2014 1:33:21 PM PDT by lbryce
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
To: DIRTYSECRET
"Why does the National Guard need Apaches?"
Uh, 'cause plenty of NG Troops are shipped overseas to do the job the Regular Army used to do all of?
21
posted on
04/19/2014 2:09:05 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: lbryce; DarthDoug
Liberals always telegraph their fears. First, they scrapped the National Guard's A-10s. Now, they are sequestering their Apaches.
Can anyone say, "Vulnerable DHS MRAPs"?
~~~~~~~~~~~
Obviously 0b0z0 & Holder know on whose side the National Guard will stand when it hits the fan. And they expect that time to be soon.
Now might be a good time to establish good contact with your friends, relatives, and colleagues who are now on active duty... 0b0z0 may have "turned" some of their leaders, but the troops mostly despise him and all he stands for...
22
posted on
04/19/2014 2:09:55 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
To: DIRTYSECRET
The national guard is almost like the army reserve.
They train on apache’s. Most of the national guard have served at least some time in iraq and afghanistan.
I think the guard also trains on abrams tanks.
23
posted on
04/19/2014 2:10:50 PM PDT
by
staytrue
To: xkaydet65
Our local NG group has been deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan several times over the last 13 years or whatever it is. (246th Transportation Battalion - Jackson, MI)
24
posted on
04/19/2014 2:14:35 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: lbryce
I'm not a reactionary or one who gets off into conspiracy theory's but this sure seems like a move to make sure the sates can not protect themselves against the feds. That brings about the question of "why would we have to protect ourselves against the federal government?"
The obvious answer is that our president intends to be presidnet for life.
For the first time I'm starting to believe that obama intends to rule our nation by force as a dictator.
Kind of scary the way this is all going. When you add in how he has purged the military leadership it is all starting to become very clear.
I do not want this to happen and I hate how this is all playing out but that is where logic takes us.
Now it is not too hard to see where all the ammunition has been going the last couple of years. They have succeeded in keeping the vast majority out of the hands of the populace. That was their goal. The important question is not where it whet, but where it did not go.
Add it up folks, it isn't looking good.
To: DIRTYSECRET
Why does the National Guard need Apaches?
To guard the nation?
26
posted on
04/19/2014 2:21:35 PM PDT
by
andyk
(I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
To: ansel12
Moving things from active to Guard and vice-versa is a normal activity.
I seriously doubt they'll be rotated back to the NG in a couple years.
This to me looks like a way to keep from buying additional choppers by dipping into the reserves.
27
posted on
04/19/2014 2:23:14 PM PDT
by
andyk
(I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
To: lbryce
28
posted on
04/19/2014 2:28:44 PM PDT
by
upchuck
(Support ABLE, the Anybody But Lindsey Effort. Yes, we are the ABLE!!)
To: DIRTYSECRET
Why does the National Guard need Apaches?
'cause the Navajo's can't cut it?
29
posted on
04/19/2014 2:30:25 PM PDT
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: andyk
The Army is doing a huge aviation reorganization. One of the things they are doing is getting rid of Kiowas. They are going to try to do the scout role with Apaches instead. Yeah, I know that is two totally different classes of helicopters, but that is their story. Sounds like they want to park all their TH-57s and replace them with Lakotas, as well. That is another head scratcher when it comes to saving money.
30
posted on
04/19/2014 2:32:05 PM PDT
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: USNBandit
In addition, why is Obama bringing all the tanks from Germany home? They are giving tanks to very small towns who have no need of them, seems ridiculous.
31
posted on
04/19/2014 2:36:14 PM PDT
by
Kackikat
To: Kackikat
Which small town, or big city, has received a “tank”?
32
posted on
04/19/2014 2:40:27 PM PDT
by
ansel12
((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
To: andyk
This to me looks like a way to keep from buying additional choppers by dipping into the reserves.
*********
After a generation of sand wars etc. we may be that depleted in material and money. Our resources are as frail as our liberty.
33
posted on
04/19/2014 2:41:47 PM PDT
by
Psalm 144
(FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
To: lbryce
What about the crews? Will htey be transferred to active duty, retrained as Blackhawk pilots, or pushed out of guard service?
34
posted on
04/19/2014 2:41:53 PM PDT
by
fso301
To: Kackikat
They are giving tanks to very small towns who have no need of them, seems ridiculous.
Wait a minute. Maybe I want a tank anyway. LOL
35
posted on
04/19/2014 2:42:10 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: ansel12
Brevard, NC among others.
36
posted on
04/19/2014 2:43:18 PM PDT
by
Kackikat
To: cripplecreek
Hey...why not, and just why are they giving these tanks to small towns....future plans?
37
posted on
04/19/2014 2:45:20 PM PDT
by
Kackikat
To: Psalm 144
After a generation of sand wars etc. we may be that depleted in material and money. Our resources are as frail as our liberty.
Yup. One of the locals who was in Afghanistan in 2012 before leaving the service said that only a small handful of those with her transportation company are even from this state. After several deployments they've depleted the pool of local people willing to spend years away from their families.
38
posted on
04/19/2014 2:49:17 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: lbryce
"There are a few governors around the country who would not stand for martial-law being arbitrarily declared by this or any president, but without any teeth (i.e. Apache attack helicopters) what could they use to stop Obama's tyranny?"
Simple, open the armories.
These helicopters are but a small piece.
I'd druther face 192 of them than 10mil very angry American men with good rifles.
39
posted on
04/19/2014 2:50:01 PM PDT
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: USNBandit
You're correct about the Kiowas. When I was at Air Assault School recently they told us of their plans to phase them out. They are good for recon and target painting, but they can't carry sh-t for armament. They're only defensive.
40
posted on
04/19/2014 2:50:19 PM PDT
by
thefactor
(yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson