Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who's Next to Follow South Carolina's Lead on the FULL State Nullification of Obamacare?
Reaganite Republican ^ | 16 December 2013 | Reaganite Republican

Posted on 12/16/2013 8:31:57 AM PST by Reaganite Republican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: jersey117

I’ve been saying that an unintended consequence of Bamcare kicking people off their insurance

is that folks will start paying for services directly out of necessity and free market forces will come into play.


21 posted on 12/16/2013 9:34:20 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

I had posted once that when all is said and done, history would look kindly on Roberts, and that his so called ‘betrayal’ was anything but. It should be interesting to see how this plays out...


22 posted on 12/16/2013 10:02:39 AM PST by ExpatCanuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

I just spent last week in South Carolina and didn’t know about this. I did see 4 or 5 signs in the median of a 4 lane highway between Charleston and Walterboro that simply said: “Who is Lee Bright?”


23 posted on 12/16/2013 10:07:52 AM PST by Married with Children
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Married with Children

Near Charleston you say? Hmmm…..that would be the work of a certain other challenger to Graham who has fallen behind Bright in all the polls….and who’s business partner is a professional poltical troll……

I think that’s a safe bet.


24 posted on 12/16/2013 10:09:34 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jukeman

Our Texas guys have been awful quiet lately.

I think the framework for nullification has been built, now only to to wait for 2014 screams from the electorate getting gored by zerocare to call a special session and nullify it.


25 posted on 12/16/2013 10:18:24 AM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jukeman

Perry called Kathleen Sebilius six months ago and told her he won’t implement it... sounds like he’s ready to go


26 posted on 12/16/2013 10:26:45 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

Me, I’m going without coverage and refusing to pay ONE F****** CENT of tribute.


27 posted on 12/16/2013 11:19:12 AM PST by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ExpatCanuck
I had posted once that when all is said and done, history would look kindly on Roberts, and that his so called ‘betrayal’ was anything but.

Nossir. He may have included a parting shot ("you get what you vote for"), but he betrayed his country. The pain this will cause will be Biblical in scope.

Everyone knows he was blackmailed. He should have come forward, told about what he was being blackmailed about, refused to comply with the blackmailer, and asked for a VERY large VERY serious investigation on the blackmail.

He would have been a hero the stature of George Washington.

28 posted on 12/16/2013 11:22:07 AM PST by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Everyone knows he was blackmailed. He should have come forward, told about what he was being blackmailed about, refused to comply with the blackmailer, and asked for a VERY large VERY serious investigation on the blackmail.

Everyone knows? Okay - please feel free to share what everyone knows. Though I wouldn't put it past this administration.

Also, how many VERY large and VERY serious investigations do you think the Democrat controlled congress and Senate would have launched? They controlled both houses in June of 2012. Would the complicit media have been more outraged about a conservative Supreme Court justice being blackmailed, or would they have focused on whatever he was being blackmailed for and blasted him for not being forthright in his confirmation hearings? He would have been forced to resign and Obama and the democract controlled senate would have appointed a left wing idealogue. Just saying.

29 posted on 12/16/2013 1:23:38 PM PST by ExpatCanuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

he was not blackmailed at all...

as much as i despise fubocare, robeerts ruling was nothing short of brilliant in the war on socialism...this ruling did more to reverse the tide of socialism and communism sweeping this country than any other ruling before it...

after the ruling was issued he stated, and i am paraphrasing here, that it is not the job of the court to save the people from themselves. he also said it is up to the electorate to elect those that represent their views..

this was a shot across the bow for conservatives, and what did they do???

they stayed home in droves...

i guess those that did not cast a ballot got what they voted for, nothing...

i also blame the talk radio pundits, who sided with the republican line instead of the constitutional line, for if they had even bothered to read the ruling, they would have known that this was a severe, near deathblow for the libs.. but they choose, en masse, to shout out the pub line..

and they are still doing it, even while the states are using this ruling not just for fubocare, but other issues ( and it is these other issues where the libs will lose)..

unless we get a majority lib court, things like fubocare, socialist security, unfunded mandates to the states, and a host of things libs love to do, cannot happen again. and, if conservatives would have shown up and voted in the house and senate races (forget electing socialist mcromney) things would be very different today...

a question, why are both fubo and the pubs interested in delaying implementation???

because once they do, it will go back in front of the supreme court, and be overturned (unless a lib majority is present on the court)..

remember, the pubs want this just as badly as the dems do..


30 posted on 12/16/2013 3:09:30 PM PST by joe fonebone (a socialist is just a juvenile communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jukeman

No; he won’t call a Special Session.


31 posted on 12/17/2013 6:38:19 AM PST by Din Maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson