Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greenfield: The Supersessionists of the Liberal Confederacy
Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog ^ | Sunday, October 20, 2013 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 10/21/2013 3:28:12 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Sultan Knish/Daniel Greenfield Ping List notification of new articles.

FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Sultan Knish ping list. I highly recommend an occasional look at the Sultan Knish blog. It is a rich source of materials, links and more from one of the preeminent writers of our age.

1 posted on 10/21/2013 3:28:12 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: daisy mae for the usa; AdvisorB; wizardoz; free-in-nyc; Vendome; Georgia Girl 2; blaveda; ...

And then the true conflict will begin.
When the appeasers are margenalized, when the quislings have been disposed, when cowards stop squealing and go hide under a rock, then patriots will rise up and demand an end to tyranny. Then Marxists will quiver, liberals will quake and progressives will run screaming into the darkness.
Rise up O men of God. Be done with lesser things. NOW is the time to face down the fools and idiots who are ruining our nation.
Call them by name. Have no fear. Their tyranny will be stopped.


2 posted on 10/21/2013 3:35:12 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

The rule of thumb is, the one who advocates violent action is an FBI plant.


3 posted on 10/21/2013 3:38:51 PM PDT by donmeaker (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
Great post. Constitutionalists respect process. Like totalitarians throughout history, the rats respect outcome. The two cannot co-exist.

I didn't notice a recommended solution. Did I miss it?

4 posted on 10/21/2013 3:47:43 PM PDT by Jacquerie (An Article V amendment convention is our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
but every time the radicals of the left displays their contempt for the consensus, they are paving the way for the rise of a Republican Party whose members are more like Ted Cruz than John McCain.

I don't see that as a problem. I am all for it. Juan McCain types are the reason the left is able to display their contempt for damn near everything.

5 posted on 10/21/2013 3:53:27 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

The constitution is a two-way street. If they continue to ignore it, there will be those who will make them pray to God it’s followed for their sake.


6 posted on 10/21/2013 3:55:04 PM PDT by optiguy (Winter is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Please add me your ping list.

As for the article, I don’t see this ending well. The outcome with minimal damage would be voluntary secession...unlikely to occur without bloodshed because the left can’t tolerate freedom for others.


7 posted on 10/21/2013 3:57:28 PM PDT by peyton randolph (Tagline copyright in violation of Directive 10-289)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Constitutionalists respect process. Like totalitarians throughout history, the rats respect outcome. The two cannot co-exist.

The other things that cannot co-exist are a Bill of Rights/Constitution based on "Nature and Nature's God" natural law, and atheism. Yet the Supreme Court has placed those two entirely contradictory ideas on equal footing since 1948, paving the way for our current anarchy.

8 posted on 10/21/2013 3:59:54 PM PDT by Albion Wilde ("Remember... the first revolutionary was Satan."--Russian Orthodox Archpriest Dmitry Smirnov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

I would love to ask McCain why he thinks he is frequently on the Sunday shows. Do you suppose he doesn’t realize the reason he is a popular guest with the likes of Crowley and Gregory is that he will consistently bash Republicans??


9 posted on 10/21/2013 4:01:01 PM PDT by originalbuckeye (Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

These people are in no way “liberal”


10 posted on 10/21/2013 4:03:50 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
The GAME MUST continue... until it's DONE..
UNless the elite political class is pulled down...


11 posted on 10/21/2013 4:05:33 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

Do you actually suppose he cares?


12 posted on 10/21/2013 4:06:54 PM PDT by workerbee (The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: workerbee

Probably not. I was really questioning his level of intelligence.


13 posted on 10/21/2013 4:26:34 PM PDT by originalbuckeye (Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

I have come to the conclusion that Juan is a megalomaniac. He is so pathologically egotistical that he has no concept of what other people see, especially when they look at him. He is almost what Freud would call the Id.


14 posted on 10/21/2013 4:31:33 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

He probably does; he likes bashing Republicans.

For him, being a Republican is a matter of convenience, like Mikey Bloomberg.

If you want to accurately characterize him, he’s a Progressive.

Hillary Clinton extolled the glory of the “early 20th Century Progressive movement”. The one that gave us income tax and Prohibition.


15 posted on 10/21/2013 4:58:14 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell; All

“The new Confederacy isn’t out to break up the Union into territorial slices, but to replace the Union with a new and different Union.”

18 U.S.C. § 2385 : US Code - Section 2385: Advocating overthrow of Government

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof - Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons. -

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/115/2385#sthash.QF4WqyMK.dpuf

2 words: Domestic enemies. That they infiltrated the government doesn’t change their (stated) purpose or their actions. Does it?

I hate it when people talk about this stuff as if it’s all academic & it’s just analysis- nothing to be done. Oh well.


16 posted on 10/21/2013 5:07:07 PM PDT by KGeorge (Till we're together again, Gypsy girl. May 28, 1998- June 3, 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

srbfl


17 posted on 10/21/2013 5:16:17 PM PDT by Excellence (All your database are belong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

No...it won’t end well, but I think Greenfield has identified the “why” so many Conservatives and even Republicans are asking.

It’s been frustrating to most that our laws and constitution are basically ignored by this administration...and worse for us to see there is no one bringing them to account. Greenfield exposes why that is in this article.

I don’t think most have identified that the “tranformation of America” Obama ran on is exactly what we are seeing happen and he has no intentions of following any rules.....with the Senate and Media in his pocket....and his strong arm in the house.....that leaves only the people to demand he resign and the entire administration.

I don’t know how are when this will happen...or even if there is a will to do so...but the only way radical lefts agenda will stop is if the people rise up and demand it....we’re not...we’re still “believing” voting them out will turn the tide....but not in this case....there simply isn’t time.


18 posted on 10/21/2013 5:42:28 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks Louis Foxwell.
The radicalization of the Democratic Party is slowly leading to a counterpart radicalism in the Republican Party... every time the radicals of the left displays their contempt for the consensus, they are paving the way for the rise of a Republican Party whose members are more like Ted Cruz than John McCain. What radicals never understand is that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The process of the consensus exists to safeguard both sides and prevent political battles from spinning out of control... They have not considered what will happen when a Republican Party that has as much resemblance to its present day leaders as Barack Obama does to Hubert Humphrey makes that same decision... The consensus we all live by is a fragile thing. It is being torn apart by the radical left and once it is destroyed, it will not bind the right, in the same way that it no longer binds the left.
When there is no more recourse to law, all that remains is recourse to lawlessness.


19 posted on 10/21/2013 5:53:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's no coincidence that some "conservatives" echo the hard left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell; sickoflibs; Liz; Fred Nerks; neverdem; stephenjohnbanker
Media outlets breathlessly report on Tea Party radicalism, which consists of wanting to undo the judicial activism of the last century. Meanwhile Obama and his cronies just ignore any law they don't like and rule by fiat.

Which of these is more radical?

ping to a great read...

20 posted on 10/21/2013 5:55:49 PM PDT by GOPJ (Self-respect is the root of discipline...dignity grows with the ability to say no to oneself-Heschel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson