Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

The questions that arise here are as follows: Are those who have vocally opposed gay marriage or homosexuality then not eligible to be appointed to government committees? Would a pastor, for instance, be banned for having Bible-based, theological views on these issues? What, exactly, does "bias" mean? What about a Catholic who has voiced support for the church's teachings? And these are only some of the many questions.................Hard to imagine this in Texas
1 posted on 07/25/2013 1:31:50 PM PDT by mandaladon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mandaladon
Fascists on the march.
2 posted on 07/25/2013 1:33:16 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Thank Mayor Julian Castro and some of his buddies on the Council for this pile of crap.


3 posted on 07/25/2013 1:35:21 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

The Castros are a poison, a cancer on the city of San Antonio. They need to be run out of office at the earliest opportunity and stonewalled at every turn until then.


4 posted on 07/25/2013 1:36:35 PM PDT by jagusafr (the American Trinity (Liberty, In G0D We Trust, E Pluribus Unum))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

With all the Catholics there are in SA, no one will want to serve in these positions for fear of getting a major ass kicking-since stupid can’t be fixed, may as well just let it be and watch the fun-and the lawsuits...


5 posted on 07/25/2013 1:37:16 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Where are all those supposedly ‘conservative Hispanic Catholics’ in this state?......


7 posted on 07/25/2013 1:38:13 PM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name......Want to have fun? Google your friend's names........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

The bigger cities in Texas are where all the carpetbaggers and illegals are moving to hence they are turning more and more liberal at the city government level.


10 posted on 07/25/2013 1:42:46 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

If this happens then I may as well start a range war, because I won’t be a second class citizen to any man.


12 posted on 07/25/2013 1:48:34 PM PDT by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

I bet there are tons of supporting comments at Yahoo too


13 posted on 07/25/2013 1:50:15 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Texas has big liberal cities like everywhere in this country.


14 posted on 07/25/2013 1:51:08 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon; Yosemitest

This city is working with or partnering (Matching funds) with federal program that is propelling this. And it could also be a part of Agenda 21 (funding).

This will be coming to a town or city in your area soon.

It is not simply an attack on free speech, it is against someone who is a Christian and yet no other religion is not mentioned.

If a person is on record as saying homosexuality is a sin you can’t run for office and/ or you can be removed from office.

This is elevating homosexuals above heterosexuals so that they have special rights.


15 posted on 07/25/2013 1:54:01 PM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon
Hard to imagine this in Texas

Not in San Antonio, Austion and Dallas- each and every one a liberal run hellhole.

17 posted on 07/25/2013 2:04:01 PM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon; All

I’m sorry if this has already been mentioned. I would argue the following constitutionally based point against such an ordinance. The Founding States made the Constitution’s Clause 3 of Article VI to protect people from not having to satisfy a religious test in order to be an officer of the federal government. So it seems reasonable that, since the 14th Amendment applied all constitutional priviliges and immunities, including Clause 3, to the states, that citizens cannot be banned from local government posts on the basis of their religious beliefs, traditional one man, one woman marriage reflecting Christian beliefs.

In fact, the Supreme Court possibly took Clause 3 into consideration when it found DOMA unconstitutional.


26 posted on 07/25/2013 2:37:56 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Not very tolerant, are they?


33 posted on 07/25/2013 4:13:48 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (If you vote for evil because you can't see evil, you ARE evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson