Skip to comments.Any Vote That Isn't For Romney Is Effectively A Vote For Obama (pic)
Posted on 07/16/2012 4:23:03 PM PDT by The Looking Spoon
I know Romney's not a hit with Freepers. Truth be told he was FAR from my first pick as well. BUT...
Created for OMG! for America. Join the grassroots there, or just join the fun at the Facebook page here
Demonstrate: How my not casting a vote for Mittens increases Obama's vote total from 1,000,000 to any other number.
God protect and keep this great nation from the unabashedly craven... and the profoundly innumerate.
I've been thinking of asking them to post pictures of the Romney bumper stickers on their cars and trucks. I mean, they're really, really behind him all the way, right?
Well said, thank you.
Yes, the Founding Fathers dedicated this country to God and His glory - but do our current leaders carry on that dedication? Do we, the citizens of America? Do our values, or laws, and our behavior reflect the true Christian spirit?
God is always there. Christ is always there. The Holy Spirit is always there. They are immutable, ever faithful. But we, the children of God, are not.
Countries come and go. Christian countries come and go. That’s why I say that God does not care about America, per se. He cares about all His children, all His creation.
God knows what is best for each of us individually, and as nations. But Man has Free Will. And too often, that Free Will is exercised in the wrong direction.
America will not be saved by divine intervention - unless that intervention comes in the form of our actions as individual private citizens, and collectively in the public arena.
So you think that NO abortion except for the health of the mother, which is what Reagan passed, is a pro-abortion law? I don’t.
But I do know that the way the libs in California interpreted the law Reagan signed made it seem that you could get an abortion for a hangnail. I also know that the rest of his life Ronald Reagan regretted giving them the opportunity to do that.
But Romney and his surrogates, trying to make him look better, have been saying Reagan was pro-abortion because Romney actually was pro-abortion. Romney said that govt. should not be able to interfere with a woman’s “right to abort her baby.” And he would do all he could to protect a woman’s “right to abort her baby.” Which translates into ‘all abortions should be legal if the mother wants to kill her baby.’ I have been unable to find the right to kill an innocent baby anywhere. It certainly is not one of the “rights” endowed by our creator.
Unlike Reagan’s law which still banned most abortions, Romney wanted to protect abortions and make it illegal for govt. to be able to stop them. Which made him an actual pro-abortion candidate. And unlike Reagan, Romney has never expressed deep regret for any of the laws and decisions he made which were far worse than the law Reagan deeply regretted passing.
Reagan never was pro-abortion he was always pro-life and became even more pro-life once he saw what the democrats did to the law he passed. Romney was never pro-life. He was pro-abortion from the start and has never shown any real regret over holding that position. Whether his pro-life epiphany, which came when he decided to run for the presidential nomination of a party which has not nominated a pro-choice person, is real or not, only Romney and God know for certain.
So please do everyone a favor and stop spreading Mitt’s lies.
Thank you! I did tweak it a little to make it fit my style a bit better but I’m not going to post it here because those same ABO who are calling you bad names would probably pee on themselves if they saw how I changed it.
Spare me the drama. I have no idea what the Romney Campaign is saying. I was just adding information to the Thread that was not there.
My point was simply that even those Politicians we have vigorously supported have made some bad policy decisions that still impact us today. Nobody is perfect, even Ronaldo Maximus.
The Primaries are over and there are two viable Candidates, one a Republican and one a Traitorous Commie Bastard. Given that choice it's the RINO for me. For you, there is no difference between the two. Whatever floats your boat.
My Vote either way will not make a difference since I live in California. My guy was Newt and he didn't make it. Now he is endorsing the Republican Candidate who happens to be Romney.
I'm not arguing the point. I'm sick of all the back and forth. Minds are made up and few will be swayed either way. We are down to Preaching to the Choir in a Church full of empty Pews.
I know that Reagan was not perfect, and I understand that pointing out his imperfection was your point. But I also know that liberals love to tear down people’s opinions of conservatives and memories of Reagan can be tainted by people spreading untruths about him after he is no longer here to defend himself.
You may not know this but in the 2008 election, Romney started this lie that Reagan was pro-choice, and pro-abortion, just as he was. It was never true, but here you are having heard it somewhere, continuing to spread this falsehood. You would think that four years later, the lie would have played itself out.
I mention it because it is a falsehood and I know exactly where the lie originated. Now you know too. So at least one new person knows and should not need to spread that lie again.
Who you choose to vote for is your business, but the truth is everyone’s business, especially when we have two major league prevaricators running for the office of president at the same time.
"I'm not voting...You guys need to get a clue about the consent of the governed"
I believe that one of the reasons so many Republicans in Congress are such candy-asses is because it is constantly reinforced that they have nothing to lose by being moderate, because moderate is "safe" in that it wins nominations and often elections.
Romney kicked to the curb, I believe, is the ONLY way to make being "moderate" candy-ass too dangerous for Republicans. Kicking Romney to the curb, voting more Republicans to Congress (which I think will happen in a big way in 2012) and then pushing them to flex their muscles in stopping Obama, has a better chance of succeeding in turning things right, than electing Romney in a landslide and expecting them to successfully oppose the most powerful member of their own party who would carry a "progressive" majority between himself, moderates, and Democrats.
Your thinking I’m not voting?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.