What happened to him to turn into a pissy pants??? Did someone hurt his wittle feewings?
I hope she runs in the primary...let the best person win...If she does not run we will always wonder what if..
We wouldn't want to risk losing.
She hasn’t even announced yet, John.
Why is Sarah Palin “polarizing” but Baraq al O’Bama is never described as such.?
They instituted Nuclear War against her the minute after she left the podium at the Republican convention in '08. Where has he been?
I don’t understand this. All I can conclude is that Ziegler is being paid off by someone. It’s not that he might be right, he might be—it’s the vociferousness of his attitude.
From C4P:
http://conservatives4palin.com/2011/06/we-accept-john-zieglers-bet.html
We Accept John Ziegler’s Bet
Posted on June 20 2011 - 4:02 AM - Posted by: Ian Lazaran
John Ziegler has made the following offer:
“But regardless, to Nolte and all other commentators who claim I am wrong about Palin’s chances in 2012, I simply ask you to put your money where your mouth is. I am officially offering a $1,000 bet, at incredible 100-1 odds, that Palin will not be inaugurated president of the United States in January of 2013.”
Under the condition that the bet is only operative if Governor Palin runs, we accept the bet and we look forward to cashing Ziegler’s $100,000 check.
Now, it’s up to the Governor to make sure we win this bet.
I am officially offering a $1,000 bet, at incredible 100-1 odds, that Palin will not be inaugurated president of the United States in January of 2013.
Sarah should take that bet then drop out of the race and collect her winnings. Too easy and fun to make liberals look retarded, thusly cementing the term of “libtard” that we have so labeled them.
I predict if she beats those odds, the folks making these bets will suddenly need Moose and Rocco to help them find their checkbooks.
I’ll take that bet
(if she runs, she will win in a landslide)
You got The cahones to put your money in escrow?
Just wanted to comment on the polling aspect the writer refers to...
POLLS ARE ALL DONE BY LSM/REP ESTABLISHMENT!!!! THERE WILL NEVER BE A GOOD POLL TAKEN THAT SHOWS SARAH PALIN IN THE LEAD.
HOWEVER, SHE WILL BE SWORN IN JAN SOMETHING 2013 AS THE FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT
Et tu, Johnny Z?
I’ll raise u one.
$200,000 that Newt Gingrich won’t win the GOP nomination.
Palin may run she may not.
However, u can bet she will be working hard to elect another large group of Tea Party minded candidates running for anything!
Liberals and liberal apologists are at their most entertaining when they attempt to say something which has a rational basis.
The fact is that statistical results which depend upon the sample are an indication of nothing other than sampling error. And nowadays, intentional "sampling error" is the business of the main stream media.
“an Obama team (and the mainstream media) that lusts after a chance to run against her”.
Let them lust.
It’s either her or someone who hasn’t entered EITHER, but who has a very decent chance of winning, like Jim DeMint.
What they’re doing with these bogus ‘challenges’ is rolling the dice on the still-growing Tea Party constituency, and putting that “swing vote” on the shoulders of Sarah Palin.
It’s almost like a dare, to see whether the Tea Party can beat the RINO and MSM choice, who now is Romney.
It’s assumed that if Palin does badly, should she run, it will be the death-blow to the Tea Party.
They have got ‘another think’ coming.
Palin in a sense though, in the RINO/MSM world, *would* polarize because her candidacy would rouse up enormous numbers of people tired of seeing another choice like the one she herself was saddled with 3 years ago, (McCain) and Obama. The polarization is ALL THEIR OWN DOING, ALL THEIR OWN MAKING,AND THEIRS TO TRY TO “SELL” AS A NEGATIVE THING.
“an Obama team (and the mainstream media) that lusts after a chance to run against her”.
Let them lust.
It’s either her or someone who hasn’t entered EITHER, but who has a very decent chance of winning, like Jim DeMint.
What they’re doing with these bogus ‘challenges’ is rolling the dice on the still-growing Tea Party constituency, and putting that “swing vote” on the shoulders of Sarah Palin.
It’s almost like a dare, to see whether the Tea Party can beat the RINO and MSM choice, who now is Romney.
It’s assumed that if Palin does badly, should she run, it will be the death-blow to the Tea Party.
They have got ‘another think’ coming.
Palin in a sense though, in the RINO/MSM world, *would* polarize because her candidacy would rouse up enormous numbers of people tired of seeing another choice like the one she herself was saddled with 3 years ago, (McCain) and Obama. The polarization is ALL THEIR OWN DOING, ALL THEIR OWN MAKING,AND THEIRS TO TRY TO “SELL” AS A NEGATIVE THING.
Why is Chinless Man so focused on Palin losing? Why is this guy who once declared himself to be a member of the Church of Tiger Woods so interested in making Palin’s run a tawdry, cheap trial? Does he not know that people who go around making Undeniable Definitive Predictions in politics are usually wrong? Cue the Toesucking Dick Morris.
John Ziegler: Sub-human comedy.
Mr. Sour Grapes needs to shut up and quit making a fool of himself (apparently God already did it for him)