Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama pay freeze for federal workers dishonest; 1.1 million still get pay raises
Examiner ^ | December 6, 2010 | Marc Schenker

Posted on 12/06/2010 4:30:55 AM PST by Suvroc10

Obama pay freeze for federal workers dishonest; 1.1 million still get pay raises. Just this past week, Obama, the "One" himself, announced a supposed pay freeze on federal employees with the lip service that it would (at least symbolically) go toward the long, arduous process of cutting federal spending and bringing down the record-shattering deficits he created. However, as with all things in Obamaland, deception is afoot much of the time! According to analysis on the subject, for the next two years that Obama claimed federal workers will have their pay "frozen," a whopping $2.5 billion will still be spent on pay raises for those very federal employees.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: dishonesty; obama; payraises
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 12/06/2010 4:30:58 AM PST by Suvroc10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10
All of that was understood at the time.

Apparently there are reporters out there who take a while to learn about federal government grades and steps.

Next, the biggest surprise of all ~ SOMEBODY GOT A PROMOTION

2 posted on 12/06/2010 4:38:20 AM PST by muawiyah (GIT OUT THE WAY ~ REPUBLICANS COMIN' THROUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10

“You lie!” Instead of castigating Joe Wilson for this accurate assessment of Obama’s truthfulness in his last State of the Union address, the entire GOP should chant this every time he lies in his 2011 SOU speech. That will never happen, of course, because the future of this nation is a political game to the ruling class in D. C.


3 posted on 12/06/2010 4:42:10 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I never believed that bs in the first place.


4 posted on 12/06/2010 4:55:13 AM PST by Loud Mime (Study the Constitution, while we still have it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10

First red flag Obama claimed.


5 posted on 12/06/2010 5:07:04 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10

Must be nice to be a public employee. Get to ignore this 2nd Great Depression.

Pray for America


6 posted on 12/06/2010 5:12:40 AM PST by bray (Sarah Palin will destroy the Repub Party, hopfully!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10

Lemme see ... 2.5 billion ... on a budget that has a trillion in deficit ...

... must ... not ... laugh ...
... must ... not ... laugh ...

Wake me up when they slash 300 billion from each years budget which contains NO deficit. Until then its political posturing.


7 posted on 12/06/2010 5:40:27 AM PST by dartuser ("The difference between genius and stupidity is genius has limits.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10
WHO CARES what other Americans make???

STOP THE CLASS WARFARE. Federal workers are our neighbors, not our enemies.

Last week congress passed a bill that gave moochelle obama over 4 BILLION for salad bars in a handful of schools, just so this wretched insecure elitist overweight flotus would have a social program to run ...

THAT mentality is our enemy - those that demand public money to disburse to a pet cause, and those that give it....that is the enemy

8 posted on 12/06/2010 5:59:31 AM PST by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray

“Must be nice to be a public employee”

It was a choice, not a chance


9 posted on 12/06/2010 6:00:31 AM PST by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Federal workers are our neighbors, not our enemies.

And a GROWING Govt with a GROWING number of public employees is not an enemy?
10 posted on 12/06/2010 6:32:40 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (formally known as Kerretarded....I changed my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

you’re wrong.


11 posted on 12/06/2010 6:38:35 AM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

This is not about “class” - it’s about the size, power and reach of government. There are far too many Federal workers, and they are making far more in salary and benefits than those of us in the Dreaded Private Sector who pay for them. Fifty years ago (1960), the majority of private sector jobs could still support an average-sized family. Today, less than 10% of such jobs can provide such security. The American middle class is dwindling as government has grown, and dependency along with it.


12 posted on 12/06/2010 6:47:24 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Eagle of Liberty
the people hired to administer federal programs are not the enemy and your anger at them is misplaced

You are being manipulated by the Alinskyites to hate and envy other Americans and to blame them for your own situation (If is such a great deal why don't you become a fed? It's not a closed club)

The nazis blamed the Jews for everyone’s bad economy, didn't they? Now you want to blame federal workers for a bad economy? You want to hate and blame federal workers, your friends and neighbors, like Germans blamed the Jews for the Weimar economy?

Why stop there at federal workers? Let's throw in teachers, bankers, insurance agents, state and local govt workers, business owners..... and anyone else with a paycheck and health benefits bigger than yours.... among people to hate and blame for your economic situation, OK? Fire 1/3 of everyone and the economy improves- right?

If you want to slow the growth of government, stop electing people who develop federal programs, put them into law and pass legislation to fund them. No programs = no workers

13 posted on 12/06/2010 6:57:40 AM PST by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
If you want to slow the growth of government, stop electing people who develop federal programs, put them into law and pass legislation to fund them. No programs = no workers

I don't elect them federal employees do.

14 posted on 12/06/2010 7:03:12 AM PST by vigilante2 (Reelect Nobody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh

You are being used as such a tool, buying into this “federal workers are overpaid” stuff ...

IT IS ALL ABOUT CLASS.

look who is feeding you those numbers on the “average” federal worker pay being so much higher than yours ... the lamestream media. They and the WH people FAXing them their talking points everyday- they are looking out for you, aren’t they? (sarc)

If there are “too many” federal govt workers is it because there are “too many” federal programs. Cut or defund the programs. That is the solution.

Stop being used as a tool to blame federal workers. Federal employment is and never was a closed club, you were and are always welcome to join if you think it’s an easy ride.

and as for the “middle class”- where do you think most federal workers reside? Why - maybe in the middle class. hunkered down like everyone else these days, except for being stigmatized as lazy overpaid drones for a career choice they made 10-15-20 years ago.


15 posted on 12/06/2010 7:08:52 AM PST by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
You are being manipulated by the Alinskyites to hate and envy other Americans and to blame them for your own situation

Wow. Um, well, I wouldn't say that I HATE Government employees because I don't.

No programs = no workers

Actually, you and I are on the same side here. Bloated Govt and HORRIBLE Economic policies are creating an environment where it is more desirable to get a Govt job than it is to work in the private sector. Why? Because it offers the false-sense of an added economic security. But what is not taught to many is HOW the money is collected to pay for Govt employees.

The private sector gathers money from selling goods and services. Selling more goods and services earns that company more money. Soon the business has to expand so they hire more workers.

The public sector gathers money from the private sector. When the private sector does well, the public sector does well. When the private sector struggles, the public sector SHOULD struggle, but most times it doesn't. Instead, the knee-jerk reaction is to raise taxes to gather more short term revenue. Or, as our current administration did, approve a stimulus which flowed money into the public sector to save govt jobs.

If the public sector were allowed to work like the private sector, the unemployment percentage would be much higher, but Fed Gov stepped in and initiated a public sector bailout.

stop electing people who develop federal programs

I do.

You want to hate and blame federal workers, your friends and neighbors, like Germans blamed the Jews for the Weimar economy?

LOL. Krystallnacht on the Public Sector!

Why stop there at federal workers? Let's throw in teachers, bankers, insurance agents, state and local govt workers, business owners..... and anyone else with a paycheck and health benefits bigger than yours....

Are you insane? How did you get this from my comment that a GROWING Govt is the problem?
16 posted on 12/06/2010 7:30:18 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (formally known as Kerretarded....I changed my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
I have the employment, salary and benefits numbers, direct from the government. Would you care to debate those rather than accuse me of being a tool?

I have nothing against Federal employees. But in terms of wages, benefits and job security, there is no comparison with the private sector today, where, to be perfectly frank: it sucks**.

**


17 posted on 12/06/2010 7:50:16 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10

What do you expect from mac daddy?

He is unable to ever tell the truth.


18 posted on 12/06/2010 8:00:56 AM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
If the private sector “sucks” why don't you sign on with the federal govt if it is such a good deal?

Ten-20 years years ago, some of us remember that being a Federal worker “sucked”. It was all a trade off for job security over opportunity to advance and maybe become wealthy and independent because of hard work and innovation.
And who wanted to manage a workforce that was rigidly regulated and unfire-able? Talk about challenges. Talk about changing cycles and attitudes.

Sorry, you are a tool if you get your information about “comparing” federal and private sector salaries from the news services and the internet.

Figures don't lie, but liars can figure.

Ten years and more ago the “average” feds (whoever they were) were shown as “underpaid”, and those figures were used to get congress to hike pay out of worries the govt was getting slugs and drones more interested in job security than skills. Funny thing about that.

BTW- that big spike in 2009 (and continues into 2010)
obama has in 2 years created a virtual “shadow govt” by inflating the budget of a lot of cabinets and agencies, created even more bureaucracies under his loony lefties, then stacked virtually every federal office in every federal agency (plus a few more his handlers created) with highly paid paid POLITICAL APPOINTEES. You can't get humble PhD’s and geniuses from Harvard and Chicago and Stanford to come oversee the Pentagon and EPA and HHS for less than $150K plus bennies, you know

I don't know what happened to spike figures in 2008- that was the year President GWB ideologically and psychologically left us, and was firmly and finally co opted and pwned by liberal forces getting ready for a democrat takeover

If the “pay averages” show an “exploded” growth in highly paid feds in the past 2 years... well, there ya go. That's the obama effect. It's not the “average” Joes and Janes who have been keeping their heads down and going to work everyday for the past 10-15-20 years, and lately dealing with all these new arrogant entitled-feeling politically hired obamites sweeping into every federal agency to "fundamentally transform" this nation. If this big anti-federal worker MEDIA build up is leading to a federal worker purge, who do you think will be fthe first to go, hmmm? Joe and Jane? Or obama's new federal worker army?

19 posted on 12/06/2010 8:17:12 AM PST by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Just to clarify: the facts I posted are not from the internet or from news services - they are extracted directly from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Department of Labor's published tables. I even checked the source data tables to confirm they were accurate. What they show is that private sector jobs are vanishing and the ones that remain are increasingly underpaid relative to average Federal public sector jobs. They also show that the private sector workforce is shrinking, even as the population grows.

Are there exceptions? Absolutely - you can see them in the data I shared. I fully agree with you that Obama has created a bloated bureaucracy of high-paid political appointees and that they may well skew the numbers, especially in relation to long-standing Federal workers (like yourself). But even so, living in the DC metro area, it may be difficult to imagine what average salaries are now like in most of the rest of the country, especially after twenty years of them decidedly not keeping pace with the cost of living.

Even many of us (like myself) with good management jobs are falling behind as the cost of living increases, our investments have been savaged and our taxes edge ever upward. Moreover - and here's the real issue, I think: there are progressively fewer people like me (taxpayers) to support an ever-enlarging bureaucracy. I understand that some want to frame the issue in terms of "class", but that's never been a real issue in America. Instead, we face a shrinking number of "breadwinner" jobs due to diminished economic growth opportunities that in turn result from massive debt, high taxes, excessive regulation and other barriers to entry (such as legal liability and insurance expenses).

To the present lack of opportunities and obstacles to starting up new businesses, add the pall of uncertainty that hangs over all of us (uncertain tax rates/ObamaCare costs/cap-and-trade fears/regulatory czars/executive orders/potential defaults and bailouts/European currency crises/Federal debt monetization) and it makes for a very somber Christmas season out here in the hinterlands.

20 posted on 12/06/2010 8:51:31 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson