Posted on 04/27/2015 8:02:51 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Interesting, isn’t it, that the women who are the biggest advocates of abortion are the ones who are the least likely to get pregnant.
Wrong.
They ARE members of the same group: the group that thinks killing babies is just peachy.
The difference?
At least the pro-abortion crowd are honest ...
Bottom line: If a child-to-be is inconvenient, she demands the right to murder it. If SHE is inconvenient to US, shall we have the same privilege?
So much to comment on.
I will just comment about the line about who wants to end up pregnant as a result of a one-night stand.
What sort of values, or lack thereof, does a person have, to have a one-night stand???
So, this writer is saying that women will have one-night stands, and it will happen with no contraception or thoughts given to consequences. Thus, abortion on demand must be available to quash the consequences of same.
Somehow we have gone from not wanting to make moral judgements about sexual behavior, to actually expecting that promiscuous behaviors, such as the one-night stand, just naturally happen.
‘a kind doctor like George Tiller gave me and my husband the gift of a fresh start when we learned that our wanted pregnancy was unhealthy’
‘She was conceived while I would still have been pregnant with a child we had begun to imagine, but who never came to be’
This author speaks in such ethereal terms about the killing of an ‘unhealthy’ (read imperfect) child that she was carrying. And that child ‘never came to be’ because she chose to kill it. I wish these zealots would talk with the women (and there are hundreds of thousands) whose lives were destroyed by their ‘choice’ to kill a baby, for whatever reason, that they were carrying. It is still killing/murder. No matter what the reason for the ‘choice’.
It’s understandable. Bitter wimmins (maybe the butch in the relationship) Take a look. I’m bettin that blurry ring thing on her left hand ain’t for her man.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ValerieTaricoCropped.jpg
What a nut, Salon is the worse along with this nut: http://valerietarico.com/contact/
Murder is murder. Plain and simple.
"Spiritual maladies" do not exist in a vacuum. She is part of the cause of this spiritual malady. It's her fault.
And yes--I do know the Scripture.
“I am Pro-Abortion because there are a million selfish excuses for it”
None of which can justify the actual murder of a human fetus that has a soul.
I personally believe suicide is an effective way to perform an abortion.
From looking over her website, looks like she is a reknown atheist, big anti-religion proponent and anti-Evangelical with some book. Looks like she is in Seattle if anyone wonders.
http://valerietarico.com/contact/
“It didn’t for the one you aborted though.”
What more need be said?
Not starring Mel Gibson, it’s abortuodome: two patients enter, one patient leaves.
And because of the behavior of one* or two parties, an innocent individual must be condemned to death?
*In the case of rape, one party- the rapist.
That’s like saying hysterectomy’s cause cancer. Just sayin’
You could say the same about liberals, socialists, progressives, communists, Marxists; but the net result is identical.
Look it up.
“Abortion care”? WTF?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
