Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC News: Senator Ted Cruz And 7 Other Politicians At The Heart Of Birther Conspiracies
http://abcnews.go.com/story?id=18773244# ^

Posted on 03/21/2013 4:37:24 PM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) is at the center of the latest "birther" conspiracy. But he's not the first to face this line of questioning.

A handful of politicians have been targeted in the last few years with the same accusation -- that they are not fit for the Presidency because they do not meet the constitutionally-mandated eligibility requirement of being a "natural-born" U.S. citizen.

Confusion around who qualifies as a "natural born" citizen has contributed to the debate, as the Constitution does not explicitly define the phrase. Some incorrectly presume it only includes people born within the boundaries of the United States. In fact, by U.S. citizenship law you can be American "at birth" or a "natural born citizen" under a few circumstances that don't involve being born on the mainland. For example, if you're born on a U.S. military base abroad, like in Panama, that counts. You are still categorized as being American "at birth" if one or both of your parents are U.S. citizens and fit a list of long and complicated requirements that arebroken down here.

Check out our list of politicians who have battled "birther" claims.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 113th; bobbyjindal; congress; corruption; cruz; electionfraud; jindal; marcorubio; mccain; mediabias; mexico; naturalborncitizen; obama; rubio; teaparty; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-314 next last
To: Brown Deer

“Sven’s $3000 loan to 0bama has now grown to $30,000!!!”

I was repeatedly asked to identify a situation that would get the plaintiff past a motion to dismiss in an Obama eligibility case. I changed the amount of the loan because some ConcernedFreepers mistakenly believe I’m confessing to a personal relationship with Obama prior to 2008.

It is important to remain focused. Everytime a critic of an eligibility civil suit states the Court cannot and will not remove a sitting President, the plaintiff’s attorney needs to make it clear the case is about reimbursing the plaintiff for their loss due to the defendant’s actions.

The risk is that Court Rules dicate a settlement conference must take place before trial begins. For example, plaintiff alleges, “I had a private meeting with Obama in 2007 where we agreed I would loan him $33,873 to be repaid on or before Jan. 9, 2013.” Obama could offer to settle the matter by paying the full amount claimed, plus plaintiff’s attorney fees and court cost, without enduring the discovery process.

Then, Obama could request that the Court dismiss the case with prejudice after the settlement transaction is completed. And ConcernedFreepers and OBOTS could continue a false narrative that Obama is eligible because the Court has seen the evidence and dismissed the case!


261 posted on 03/28/2013 3:38:30 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen
Obama’s only connection to Connecticut is his SSN filed on his behalf by his case manager at Catholic Social Services of Connecticut. Only foreign nationals could enter the Federal Foster Care program in the 70’s.

The only problem with this "only connection to Connecticut" is that the SSN is not his. Can you explain this?

262 posted on 03/28/2013 5:12:27 AM PDT by GregNH (If you are unable to fight, please find a good place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: GregNH; Brown Deer

“The only problem with this “only connection to Connecticut” is that the SSN is not his. Can you explain this?”

You’ll have to ask Susan Daniels or Orly Taitz about that. It’s not a part of the narrative I promote concerning Obama’s ineligibility to be President of the United States.

I’ve emailed and messaged Orly Taitz on several different occasions that it is quite common for a child in Federal Foster Care custody to have a SSN pre-fix in a state they haven’t lived in and to have multiple security numbers. Unfortunately, she ignores me because BrownDeer says I have no credibility.

Ironically, I pulled a image off of Orly’s website on the NUMIDENT file for an individual that was in the foster care program. The NUMIDENT file was coded to indicate the individual had multiple security numbers.

Read about it here: http://svenmagnussen.blogspot.com/2013/01/deconstructing-thomas-louis-woods.html

Attention Orly Taitz and Susan Daniels: Multiple SSNs could be an indication of fraud by people other than the original applicant. If so, the original applicant could be assigned a new SSN to eliminate the threat of identity. If so, the original applicant would have multiple SSNs assigned to them.

Multiple SSNs is common for children in foster care. Multiple SSNs do not prove the child was in foster care and do not prove the child has committed fraud. You’ll have to examine the applicants complete NUMIDENT file to determine if its fraud by the original applicant or if the original applicant is a victim of fraud.


263 posted on 03/28/2013 6:32:57 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

“I’ve emailed and messaged Orly Taitz on several different occasions...”

For the ninth time, I have asked you this:

Will you sign a affidavit stating the detailed facts of your personal knowledge of knowing Obama naturalized in 1983 and turn that over to Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse lead investigator Lt. Mike Zullo?

I, Lt. Zullo and the other 7 Maricopa County Sheriff Department Cold Case Posse investigators deserve a answer. Will you give a simple yes or no to the above question Sven. Your credibility is at hand here.


264 posted on 03/28/2013 6:58:41 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen; Brown Deer

I guess my point it that that number was issued to someone else so the SSA would not have given Zippo that number when the CSS on his behalf applied for the number.
Yet on Zippie’s 2009 tax return is the number that was issued to that other person. We have not seen any other SSN associated with Zero that can be verified to belong to him, at least under the name he is using.


265 posted on 03/28/2013 7:04:16 AM PDT by GregNH (If you are unable to fight, please find a good place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
It is important to remain focused.

Sven states here that everything he has written have been fictional situations.
266 posted on 03/28/2013 8:49:27 AM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: GregNH; LucyT
It’s not a part of the narrative I promote...
267 posted on 03/28/2013 9:05:34 AM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen; WildHighlander57; Ray76; Cold Case Posse Supporter; LucyT
You’re quoting a policy statement from the State Department updated in 2012. The FAM is updated and changed with each administration. The FAM in 1968 is vastly different from the FAM in 2012.

The U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual was first published in 1973.

Since you have access to USCIS archives (as mentioned on your FR infopage) could you provide the 1968 version of the 7 FAM 1200, 7 FAM 1290?

This should be interesting. ;-)
268 posted on 03/28/2013 9:26:34 AM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

Brown Deer wrote:

“....The U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual was first published in 1973......”

That’s right, I remember seeing a reference to an older document number (’7 FAM supersedes ‘ or xxx is superseded by 7 FAM).

More digging :D


269 posted on 03/28/2013 9:34:36 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen; Admin Moderator; LucyT; melancholy
Read about it here...

How many times have you pimped your blog in this thread alone? Has this now become an acceptable practice on FR?

My website, Post 131 has received thousands of views.
Post 159
Post 162
Post 168
Post 263

Only thousands of views? then they must all be coming from "ConcernedFreepers".
270 posted on 03/28/2013 9:40:45 AM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

And in #261 in this thread he says concerned freepers say 0 is eligible.

:(

From #261:

“Then,Obama could request that the Court dismiss the case with prejudice after the settlement transaction is completed. And ConcernedFreepers and OBOTS could continue a false narrative that Obama is eligible because the Court has seen the evidence and dismissed the case!”


271 posted on 03/28/2013 9:43:53 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

” Catholic Social Services of Connecticut was the only provider of the Federal Foster Care program to take custody of an unaccompanied minor with foreign nationality at a Port of Entry in Hawaii.”

Please provide me a link that supports this assertion.


272 posted on 03/28/2013 9:57:46 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer; LucyT

Maybe under orders from the white bathhouse to get your IP address. If you click the URL,, your IP address may be mired in STD viruses.

Practice SAFE clicking!


273 posted on 03/28/2013 10:15:04 AM PDT by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: melancholy; LucyT; Brown Deer

Melancholy,

I’m ROTFLMAOPIMP, you just made my WEEK!

(the last four capitalized letters don’t refer to a blog......

or do they?)


274 posted on 03/28/2013 10:20:39 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

“The U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual was first published in 1973.”

I did not know the Foreign Affairs Manual did not exist in 1968. You are correct and I am wrong.

It also means the issuance of CLNs was open to interpretation as to who is eligible and who is not eligible. No CLN is issued without the written consent of the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State is guided by the foreign policy pronouncements of POTUS at that time.

So, instead of looking at the post-1973 FAM, or it’s predecessor policy and procedures manual (if any), we should be asking ourselves would the President of the United States in 1968 put forth a policy to allow a 7-year-old living with an Indonesian father and American mother in Indonesia to renounce his U.S. Citizenship.

What would LBJ do? I’m pretty sure he told SoS Rusk to issue the kid his CLN with the caveat he could move back to the U.S. and recapture his U.S. Citizenship with a written request and an oath of allegiance anytime up to 6 months past his 18th birthday.

I’m thinking about writting an article about this on my blog http://svenmagnussen.blogspot.com .


275 posted on 03/28/2013 10:38:38 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

Correction: from 1910 to 1973, foreign affairs policy and procedures manual was called the Central Policy File and referred to as the Decimal File.


276 posted on 03/28/2013 10:48:15 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

Blog, brothel, eh...what’s in the name?

It’s all the same. The white bathhouse (s)CREW ASSociation is very devious.

The (o)anus is on the MSM, republican Congressmen and “L0w & H0lder” to provide the American people with 0kaka’s education records.

Dear Reader’s the foreign student with negative IQ will beam him back to chicago’s Man Country bathhouse in a jiffy.

The communist elite would never associate themselves with an undocumented dummy!


277 posted on 03/28/2013 10:57:09 AM PDT by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

“Eyewitness testimony of direct examination of a recorded document (secondary source) is not hearsay. It’s referred to as secondary source because the eyewitness does not possess or control the document. Anyone who has visited or worked in a U.S. Federal facility that houses documents protected by the Privacy Act know its impossible to make copies, photograph or record a document without specific authorization.”

Under the FRE there is a hearsay exception for the custodians of official records who are government employees action in an official capacity, such as those who work in a US document retention facility. You have not yet claimed to be such a person.

If a plaintiff’s case gets dismissed on a motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss due to lack of jurisdiction or standing preceded by a general answer requiring no rebuttal of plaintiff’s specific claims, then there is no trial, no discovery and no evidence or witness testimony placed before the court. So no primary or “secondary” witness testimony from employees or custodians at US document facilities would be allowed.


278 posted on 03/28/2013 12:45:40 PM PDT by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

I’m thinking about writting an article about this on my blog http://svenmagnussen.blogspot.com .
279 posted on 03/28/2013 5:09:41 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

<—— are my comments. “ “is brown deer’s.

To: Brown Deer

“The U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual was first published in 1973.”

I did not know the Foreign Affairs Manual did not exist in 1968. You are correct and I am wrong.

It also means the issuance of CLNs was open to interpretation as to who is eligible and who is not eligible. No CLN is issued without the written consent of the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State is guided by the foreign policy pronouncements of POTUS at that time.

<——Not open to interpretation, there WAS a manual called by a different name, as noted in post #276, so the remainder of the paragraph is irrelevant.

So,instead of looking at the post-1973 FAM,or it’s predecessor policy and procedures manual (if any),we should be asking ourselves would the President of the United States in 1968 put forth a policy to allow a 7-year-old living with an Indonesian father and American mother in Indonesia to renounce his U.S. Citizenship.

<—— there was a manual to be followed; see post #276. Presidential edicts are a matter of record and can be checked.

What would LBJ do? I’m pretty sure he told SoS Rusk to issue the kid his CLN with the caveat he could move back to the U.S. and recapture his U.S. Citizenship with a written request and an oath of allegiance anytime up to 6 months past his 18th birthday.

<-——the phrase —could move back..... past his 18th birthday—. is standard boilerplate, but —LBJ telling Rusk to issue a CLN— would have to be researched; again, everything a president does is archived someplace.

I’m thinking about writting an article about this on my blog http://svenmagnussen.blogspot.com .
<——The sixth blogpimp on just THIS thread!

275 posted on Thu Mar 28 2013 12:38:38 GMT-0500 (CDT) by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies | Report Abuse]


280 posted on 03/28/2013 7:01:35 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-314 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson