“The only problem with this “only connection to Connecticut” is that the SSN is not his. Can you explain this?”
You’ll have to ask Susan Daniels or Orly Taitz about that. It’s not a part of the narrative I promote concerning Obama’s ineligibility to be President of the United States.
I’ve emailed and messaged Orly Taitz on several different occasions that it is quite common for a child in Federal Foster Care custody to have a SSN pre-fix in a state they haven’t lived in and to have multiple security numbers. Unfortunately, she ignores me because BrownDeer says I have no credibility.
Ironically, I pulled a image off of Orly’s website on the NUMIDENT file for an individual that was in the foster care program. The NUMIDENT file was coded to indicate the individual had multiple security numbers.
Read about it here: http://svenmagnussen.blogspot.com/2013/01/deconstructing-thomas-louis-woods.html
Attention Orly Taitz and Susan Daniels: Multiple SSNs could be an indication of fraud by people other than the original applicant. If so, the original applicant could be assigned a new SSN to eliminate the threat of identity. If so, the original applicant would have multiple SSNs assigned to them.
Multiple SSNs is common for children in foster care. Multiple SSNs do not prove the child was in foster care and do not prove the child has committed fraud. You’ll have to examine the applicants complete NUMIDENT file to determine if its fraud by the original applicant or if the original applicant is a victim of fraud.
“I’ve emailed and messaged Orly Taitz on several different occasions...”
For the ninth time, I have asked you this:
Will you sign a affidavit stating the detailed facts of your personal knowledge of knowing Obama naturalized in 1983 and turn that over to Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse lead investigator Lt. Mike Zullo?
I, Lt. Zullo and the other 7 Maricopa County Sheriff Department Cold Case Posse investigators deserve a answer. Will you give a simple yes or no to the above question Sven. Your credibility is at hand here.
I guess my point it that that number was issued to someone else so the SSA would not have given Zippo that number when the CSS on his behalf applied for the number.
Yet on Zippie’s 2009 tax return is the number that was issued to that other person. We have not seen any other SSN associated with Zero that can be verified to belong to him, at least under the name he is using.