Skip to comments.
New Dinosaur Species Found in India
AP ^
| August 13, 2003
| RAMOLA TALWAR BADAM
Posted on 08/13/2003 9:02:05 PM PDT by nwrep
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,721-2,740, 2,741-2,760, 2,761-2,780 ... 3,121-3,129 next last
To: CobaltBlue
You're a lawyer? Man, I am never talking to you again!! ;)
2,741
posted on
08/25/2003 1:49:45 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
To: Aric2000
The scientific evidence existed first, so without science, and the scientific evidence that came from it, there would be NO theory of evolution. So no, without science, there would be no Theory of Evolution. Without science, biology would consist of little more than a long list of a million or so unrelated species. (Ah, but if that were the situation, there would have been no Hitler.)
2,742
posted on
08/25/2003 1:51:04 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: Aric2000
It's a rotten job but somebody's got to do it. ;^)
2,743
posted on
08/25/2003 1:52:11 PM PDT
by
CobaltBlue
(Never voted for a Democrat in my life.)
To: PatrickHenry
Yep, Hitler was a Christian alright. If you have shown anything, its he was a theistic evolutionist, not a creationist. If you read his statements in Mein Kamph, they are clearly evolutionary in nature with an occasional "Our creator" thrown in. They speak of natural selection, survival of the fittest, all naturalistic evolutionary assumptions. Hitler was an evolutionist, was not Christian, and used evolutionary theory to justify genocide. Although it sinned in the beginning by not doing so, many in the German Christian church did stand against the Fuhrer and his insanity.
Some four thousand Protestant ministers, led by Karl Barth and Hans Asmussen, formed the Confessing Church, which at Barmen in 1934 declared that no human Fuhrer could stand above the Word of God. The Confessing Church lost its properties, its seminary was suppressed, its journals were prohibited, and when war came the members of its clergy of military age and not in prison were assigned to positions of greatest danger, while the older leaders were sent to concentration camps. Among them was Martin Niemoller, a Lutheran pastor who after more than half a year in solitary confinement was brought to trial under Hitler's law against "treacherous attacks upon state and party." His refusal to capitulate and his persistent resistance to Nazism made him the symbolic figure of the Protestant opposition until the downfall of the Nazis.4
4. Roland H. Bainton (Marshall B. Davidson, Editor) The Horizon History of Christianity (New York: American Heritage Publishing Co., Inc., 1964), p.390.
To: DittoJed2
I am not dismissing science. I am dismissing evolution. You confuse the two and make the two sound inseparable. You could still have science without evolution. And, strangely, you could have evolution without science.It is possible that some theory will replace evolution as currently understood, but biblical inerrancy plus literalism stands in opposition to most of science, and without science, evolution would never have been proposed.
To: Junior
I don't "believe" in evolution. I accept it as the best explanation for the diversity of life we see around us. It's a mystical explaination or your origin. The "science" is beyond you but you pretend to understand it. What you atmit to not understanding you accept by faith. It can be theistic but doesn't have to be. It can neither be proven nor disproven. It is religion.
2,746
posted on
08/25/2003 1:53:54 PM PDT
by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrisssssssstian)
To: PatrickHenry
I didn't start this Hitler stuff, but as long as some creationist was foolish to bring it up ... Actually, Hitler was a creationist:Hitler was a creationist, Hitler was an evolutionist, Hitler was whatever it was convenient to be at that exact moment. That's the stupidity of this argument. People who really, really want to exterminate another race of people use whatever tools are easily available at the time, be they Darwinism, Christianity, Shintoism, Islam or whatever. Trying to infer anything but expediency from this betrays a sad lack of histrorical knowledge, or an extreme tendentiousness.
To: Junior
Define hotWerrrlll..hotter than we're used to in these Isles, try 30/90+. Nowt to what you're used to I daresay!
To: Right Wing Professor
Hitler was a creationist, Hitler was an evolutionist, Hitler was whatever it was convenient to be at that exact moment. Bingo. So why, oh why, do creationists continue to raise such a stupid argument? Oh ... I've answered my own question.
2,749
posted on
08/25/2003 1:56:07 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: Right Wing Professor
He wasn't a creationist. He may have somehow weirdly believed that the Creator set forward evolution as many Christians do today, but he wasn't a Creationist. And, he wasn't Christian.
If you have studied Nazi Germany, Hitler used Christianity as a propaganda tool, was raised in the R.C. church, but gave no deference to Christ at all. I don't even think that Jesus is mentioned in Mein Kampf. Could be wrong. But I don't think so.
To: All
And the stupidity continues....
Such willful ignorance is beyond my ability to comprehend.
2,751
posted on
08/25/2003 2:02:20 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
To: DittoJed2
He wasn't a creationist. He may have somehow weirdly believed that the Creator set forward evolution as many Christians do today, but he wasn't a Creationist. And, he wasn't Christian. See post 2735.
Hitler used Christianity as a propaganda tool
He used evolution as a propaganda tool also.
To: DittoJed2
Again, I did not call Evolutionists Nazis. I simply said the Nazis were evolutionists.
And we are saying your "logic" is absurd. OBL is a religionist. Tim McVeigh was a member of the US Military and a christian. The KKK were christians. Anyone can play your game, which is devoid of credibility.
To: All
I am being on "Virtual Ignore" because I dared to say that the Nazi Hitler was an Evolutionist. Yet I can be subjected to all sorts of personal attacks such as the one's by Aric and nobody says a blasted thing. It seems like most of "the willing" are just a bunch of blustering hypocrites who only like to hear themselves talk and major on belittling those who disagree with them. Lurkers can re-read these threads and see if I do or do not speak the truth. As for me, this thread is now on VIRTUAL IGNORE until another day. You all are like arguing with a wall. And, my points have been adequately made- so I will let them rest.
To: CobaltBlue
2,755
posted on
08/25/2003 2:05:36 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Right Wing Professor
He used evolution as a propaganda tool also. No, no. That was real. A creationist knows these things.
2,756
posted on
08/25/2003 2:05:42 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: All
She complains about talking to a wall?
never mind......
Such willful ignorance, and not understanding a word that WE said.
Then complaining about us attacking her with the same type of stupidity.
Can give it real well, but when she is asked to take it, she picks up her ball and goes home.
2,757
posted on
08/25/2003 2:08:27 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
To: All
Truly, I wasnt going to post another word on this Hitler/Nazi stuff but I am compelled. Flame wars are the only thing which can possibly result from such irrelevant assertions as Hitler was an evolutionist or Jim Jones was a Christian.
True or false doesnt matter. They mean nothing nada zilch. All such statements can do is create harmful resentment.
Please stop fueling the argument!
To: DittoJed2
Where did the rules for democracy come from in Scandinavian countries? Ancient Greece?
2,759
posted on
08/25/2003 2:11:51 PM PDT
by
Junior
(Killed a six pack ... just to watch it die.)
To: Junior
Maybe directly from the Norns. The Athling dates back to 960 or earlier. Of course, the Pagan Greeks had democracies dating back to the -300 or so.
2,760
posted on
08/25/2003 2:15:11 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,721-2,740, 2,741-2,760, 2,761-2,780 ... 3,121-3,129 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson