Skip to comments.
Squandering the Cuban vote
Washington Times ^
| Aug. 2, 2003
| WT Editorial
Posted on 08/01/2003 10:41:38 PM PDT by FairOpinion
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:05:51 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
I do hope Bush intervenes and won't let these 19 Cuban refugees be sent back, not for political reasons, but because it's the right thing to do.
And it's way past time for President Bush to change Clinton's "wet-foot, dry-foot" policy, which is what compels the INS and the Coast Guard to send back these poor people fleeing Castro's dictatorship.
To: FairOpinion
We dont give a damn about all the mexicans coming here illegaly, but a few Cubans try to escape tyrrany & we send them back
If George W doesn't change this asinine policy, he doesn't deserve to be re-elected
To: FairOpinion
Without the votes of 500 Cubans in Miami, Owlgore would be president.
3
posted on
08/01/2003 10:56:26 PM PDT
by
RLK
To: Ford Fairlane
Mexican, Cuban, Peruvian or frikkin' Martian, we cannot solve all the world's problems by moving the entire dissident population of all the turd-world countries here. I'm sorry if it sounds mean, but the answer to all the world's problems is not, "Move to America". We just cannot do it.
4
posted on
08/01/2003 10:57:43 PM PDT
by
Thorondir
To: Thorondir
...Furthermore, I truly feel for the poor escapees from Fidel's damned prison camp, but they need to deal with him rather than just run away and leave their family and friends floundering under his iron heel. What if the American colonists would have just run away to another country instead of fighting against England's tyrranny? That was a war nobody said we could win, but we did.
5
posted on
08/01/2003 11:00:29 PM PDT
by
Thorondir
To: RLK
"Without the votes of 500 Cubans in Miami, Owlgore would be president. "
---
And if the Cuban Americans hadn't stopped the Democrat vote counters from taking the votes into a closed room to "count", Bush wouldn't have had those extra 500 votes, you can bet on that too.
To: Thorondir
the answer to all the world's problems is not, "Move to America". We just cannot do it.I agree - but we should have fixed the Cuba problem in 62 & we let them down - & if we are letting mexicans in why are we sending cubans back
To: FairOpinion; Luis Gonzalez
There is one fly in this ointment with both moral and political ramifications. First off, let me state that I do not like this police and was involved in enforcing if for many years. That said:
If the administration over turned current policy for Cubans would it have a moral obligation to do the same thing for Haitians? I believe it would myself, but that is only because I've seen the conditions in Haiti and the looks on the faces of those who we returned.
If Haitians were not given the same consideration then the President's many detractors would scream foul and how much more politically costly would it be nationally? If he gave Haitians the same consideration? Then you know this would cause an even greater uproar amongst certain elements who only grudingly vote Republican.
Oddly enough, candidate Clinton did promise to reverse this police and allow Haitians in. Despite Coast Guard warnings, President Clinton didn't and many thousands of Haitians set sail for freedom. Many died when their overloaded boats over turned (we often found wreckage and parts of bodies). The lucky ones were interdicted and taken back to Haiti were many were summarily executed, out of sight of course, by thugs. Of Course President Clinton was never taken to task for this.
This is a very difficult issue...I wish I had the answer.
8
posted on
08/01/2003 11:14:26 PM PDT
by
CWOJackson
(go pat go,,,going, going....gone)
To: Thorondir
Mexican, Cuban, Peruvian or frikkin' Martian, we cannot solve all the world's problems by moving the entire dissident population of all the turd-world countries here. I'm sorry if it sounds mean, but the answer to all the world's problems is not, "Move to America". We just cannot do it.
-------------------------
That's a separate issue, but one that should be examined. If left to thir own devices half the world would come here looking for a better life. There is no way of accommodating them here. They need to build a better life where they are. Additionally, many of the people who would come here bring the attitudes that have made life less better where they were and those attitudes suck the life out of the system here.
9
posted on
08/01/2003 11:16:58 PM PDT
by
RLK
To: RLK
Yep. They often come here to escape the oppression that their culture enabled back home, then get homesick for that same culture and use it to drag ours down into the gutter. It's sad and all too common, but I can't say I blam them.
The bottom like is, though, that we cannot just absorb every unhappy person in the world into the United States. If they cannot build a safe, clean, prosperous and fair society in their own homelands, then how can we expect them to act like they belong in ours?
To: CWOJackson
"If the administration over turned current policy for Cubans would it have a moral obligation to do the same thing for Haitians?"I grow tired of the comparison between Cubans and Haitians, so let's settle this once and for all.
If you claim that we have a moral obligation to treat them the same, then what you are saying is that we need to invade Cuba (like we invaded Haiti), overthrow the despot running the country (like we overthrew Duvalier), and set up free elections (like we did in Haiti).
The current policy in place, is an agreement between Clinton and Castro, and I don't elevate agreements with despots to the level of US policy...do you?
The prevailing law is the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966...it's the law. This law is being violated by a Bill Clinton Executive Order, I (along with most conservatives) consider EO's to be unconstitutional...what do you think?
Haitians and Cubans have not been treated equally, so either send in the Marines and knock off Fidel, or overturn "wet foot, dry foot", and adhere to the constitutionally enacted law.
11
posted on
08/01/2003 11:26:59 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Yo soy la Cuba libre.)
To: CWOJackson
"This is a very difficult issue..."
---
I agree. There is no easy answer. But we can address them one at a time. What puts the Cubans into a different category, is that we had a long standing policy towards them, which Clinton changed in a cruel way.
A lot of people from a lot of countries all want to come to the US, because they want freedom, democracy and capitalism. Of course we can't take them all in. But I think if Bush will get a second term, he will make great strides towards helping more countries to become free and democratic.
To: FairOpinion
I agree. There is no easy answer. But we can address them one at a time. What puts the Cubans into a different category, is that we had a long standing policy towards them, which Clinton changed in a cruel way. Yep but Castro also has the Mariel card. Releasing violent criminals from his jails.
I don't think any administration wants to go through that again.
13
posted on
08/01/2003 11:44:38 PM PDT
by
Dane
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: Dane
"Yep but Castro also has the Mariel card"
---
And we have the "cruise missile card".
To: RLK
Your analysis of election 2000 is correct, but one could just as easily credit Bush's victory to his winning the non-Hispanic white vote in Florida. Funny how Republicans, in their zeal to win the affections of people not naturally inclined to support them, will forget the people who actually do vote for them (Although I admit that Cubans are the ONE Hispanic group the GOP has done well with, though that support has declined over time)
But back to your point; you could credit his victory to any group or locality from which he achieved a 500 vote advantage.
16
posted on
08/02/2003 12:16:42 AM PDT
by
Aetius
To: FairOpinion
Cubans' return 'just not right,' Gov. Bush says***The governor hinted at a major announcement of some kind by his brother's administration in the coming months related to Cuba policy. ''I think this can be rectified,'' he said.
The issue could prove politically damaging to the president, who relied, in part, on hundreds of thousands of typically loyal Republican Cuban Americans in 2000 to narrowly win Florida and, as a result, the White House.
The president's advisors believe Florida could be pivotal for his reelection next year. Democratic challengers are already angling to exploit the flap, with Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman calling a South Florida news conference earlier this week to declare the repatriation an ''abandonment of American values,'' and then showing up at the Versailles Restaurant in Little Havana to mingle.
But the statements by the president's younger brother -- a Miami resident and fluent Spanish speaker with credibility among exile activists -- could serve to help repair the damage by reminding Cuban Americans of the brothers' close ties to them.
The governor acknowledged in the interview that losing Cuban-American support could be devastating to the GOP, noting that President Bill Clinton's success in wooing even a mere third of their vote helped him win Florida in 1996.
A key critic on Thursday welcomed the potential for changes in policy but attributed the governor's assurances to politics.
''I think they're going to have to do something, because they can't win Florida without the Cuban-American community's overwhelming support,'' said Joe Garcia, executive director of the influential Cuban American National Foundation, whose top leadership has been especially critical of the Bushes in recent days. ``Unfortunately, it took the foundation and others demanding action over things that were promised three years ago.''
In the interview, Gov. Bush called Lieberman's move a ''repugnant'' political play, saying that he registered his disagreement with the White House ``with respect, not rancor.''
Acknowledging a failure by the White House to articulate a ''coherent policy'' on Cuba, the governor added that the president would announce major changes in policy sometime before the 2004 election.***
To: FairOpinion
I thought they had already been sent back. If Bush allows this to stand, he does not deserve to be reelected. I am upset about this.
18
posted on
08/02/2003 1:40:08 AM PDT
by
marron
To: marron
They were sent to Guantanamo Bay but its an outrage that people fleeing a Communist tyranny are going to be housed with terrorists whose goal is the destruction of America.
19
posted on
08/02/2003 3:28:07 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: RLK
That's BS. I have yet to meet a first-generation Cuban immigrant who thinks Communism is hot stuff.
20
posted on
08/02/2003 3:47:02 AM PDT
by
Green Knight
(Looking forward to seeing Jeb stepping over Hillary's rotting political corpse in 2008.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson