Skip to comments.
Pheobe Debates The Theory of Evolution
Original scene from the show... Friends. ^
| NA
| NA
Posted on 07/24/2003 1:55:39 PM PDT by Mr.Atos
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680, 681-700, 701-720 ... 2,721-2,723 next last
To: Aric2000
Enjoy!
To: Aric2000
YOU said:
"Delusional Creationists placemarker for me."
But YOU'VE also said:
"Intolerance of another because of their religious beliefs is NOT only unconstitutional, and tells me that they could give a rip about it, it is also racist, which is something that they claim to abhor, but to dislike or hate someone because of their religious beliefs, is JUST as racist as hating someone because of the color of their skin."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/943130/posts?page=1590#1590
hypocrite?
682
posted on
07/28/2003 6:19:58 PM PDT
by
ALS
(http://designeduniverse.com Featuring original works by FR's finest . contact me to add yours!)
To: VadeRetro; All
tick tock?
Wow, I can type that too!!
I do believe that ALS is threatening us, ohh, I am so scared!! NOT....
Good night Vade....
683
posted on
07/28/2003 6:20:04 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
To: Aric2000
ahh thanks! We'll just add this, "poster boy for creationist fundamentalism" from #679
684
posted on
07/28/2003 6:21:21 PM PDT
by
ALS
(http://designeduniverse.com Featuring original works by FR's finest . contact me to add yours!)
To: Aric2000
Well, after that, her opinion isn't gonna mean a lot to me, because it is VERY obvious who is who in this thread. I thought that she was actually fair in her opinions and posts, I guess I was wrong. Don't take it like that. I'm sure BB did the best she could. These things are difficult.
685
posted on
07/28/2003 6:21:29 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: ALS
Delusional is an adjective, describing a certain type of creationist that I am talking about, NOT creationists in general. You knew EXACTLY the creationist I was talking about, so the point was made.
Sorry stud, the generalities don't work around here, the AM's are a bit smarter then that, no matter how hard you wish otherwise.
686
posted on
07/28/2003 6:22:34 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
To: Aric2000
687
posted on
07/28/2003 6:23:09 PM PDT
by
ALS
(http://designeduniverse.com Featuring original works by FR's finest . contact me to add yours!)
To: PatrickHenry
These things are difficult. More like impossible. The light bulb has to want to change.
To: VadeRetro
There-went-three-hours-Ill-never-see-again PLACEMARKER.
689
posted on
07/28/2003 6:26:47 PM PDT
by
jennyp
(http://lowcarbshopper.bestmessageboard.com)
To: VadeRetro
"When Trolls Collide" placemarker.
690
posted on
07/28/2003 6:27:00 PM PDT
by
Junior
(Killed a six pack ... just to watch it die.)
To: jennyp
Whole-day-and-then-some-shot-to-hell PLACEMARKER.
To: VadeRetro
I'm eating
you buffoons keep on buffooning
brb
692
posted on
07/28/2003 6:32:51 PM PDT
by
ALS
(http://designeduniverse.com Featuring original works by FR's finest . contact me to add yours!)
To: js1138
Right now, the only legal public ideology in America is science, . . . I can see how evolution can be seen as a symbol of all the excesses of social engineering in public schools. Perceptive.
To: Alamo-Girl
One of the reasons I bring up heresy is because I find the concepts of heresy and orthodoxy fascinating. If you ever study the history of Athanasianism vs. Arianism it was a very close call and very political.
For a while, Athanasians were heretics, but they won.
As winners, they got to rewrite history.
I have a hard time figuring out where fundamentalists stand on orthodoxy vs. heresy. On the one hand, I read your posts to the effect of there being 12 Apostles and Jesus never settled their disputes and Revelations says there are more than one church, and on the other hand I am told that I am not a real Christian because I don't believe this and that.
694
posted on
07/28/2003 6:40:25 PM PDT
by
CobaltBlue
(Never voted for a Democrat in my life.)
To: PatrickHenry
You have concluded that I'm the bad guy in this shabby little drama. Okay. Thank you for your opinion. And thus you make little moi the "bad guy" of this piece....
Ditching responsibility -- again -- are we? And while you're at it, attibuting motives to me -- that I am operating under the assumption that you are a "bad guy" -- to boot!
There is nothing that I wrote that even remotely suggests this. But you were kind enough to "fill in the blanks," now weren't you? (i.e., by attributing motives to me which weren't my motives at all.)
May I say how thoroughly sick I am of playing this trivial (and even irrational) game by now?
What does it take to get you to "buy a clue?"
695
posted on
07/28/2003 6:47:52 PM PDT
by
betty boop
(We can have either human dignity or unfettered liberty, but not both. -- Dean Clancy)
To: VadeRetro
...if you're going to run point fingers you need to get out of the pig-pen. Such a characterization of what is going on here is beneath contempt. Number one, I have strenuously avoided "pointing fingers" at all. To invite someone to "look into the mirror" -- a completely general, equal-opportunity invitation -- is hardly to point a finger at specific individuals. Number two, I resent your characterization of people whom I like and respect as denizens of any putative "pig pen," especially since their characterization as such seems to rely exclusively on your own utterly subjective whim.
If there is a "pig pen" here, maybe it exists only between your own two ears. (Just a guess.)
696
posted on
07/28/2003 6:56:24 PM PDT
by
betty boop
(We can have either human dignity or unfettered liberty, but not both. -- Dean Clancy)
To: betty boop
Number two, I resent your characterization of people whom I like and respect as denizens of any putative "pig pen," especially since their characterization as such seems to rely exclusively on your own utterly subjective whim. Facts have been submitted to a candid world.
To: Junior
sTROLLing out for the night placemarker.
To: betty boop
May I say how thoroughly sick I am of playing this trivial (and even irrational) game by now? What does it take to get you to "buy a clue?" BB, I have accepted your judgment without argument; and I attribute no motive to you other than sincerity. I deeply regret that my postings make you sick. I also regret my condition of utter cluelessness. God bless you.
699
posted on
07/28/2003 7:02:03 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: VadeRetro
700
posted on
07/28/2003 7:02:24 PM PDT
by
ALS
(http://designeduniverse.com Featuring original works by FR's finest . contact me to add yours!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680, 681-700, 701-720 ... 2,721-2,723 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson