Skip to comments.
THAT URANIUM STORY
NRO ^
| 7/14/2003
| David Frum
Posted on 07/14/2003 8:59:22 PM PDT by Utah Girl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520, 521-540, 541-560 ... 781-790 next last
To: dirtboy
Oh, stamp your foot and have a temper tantrum because I don't agree with your assessment of my character.
521
posted on
07/15/2003 11:53:31 AM PDT
by
carton253
(You are free to form your own opinions, but not your own facts.)
To: Carolinamom; Miss Marple; onyx; Howlin; justshe; PhiKapMom; Marysecretary
Both you, Howlin, and you Miss Marple, should recognize that *I* have been called a "biddy" AND "butt-smoocher" in the past couple days. That makes me QUEEN of both groups, neigh, EMPRESS. I expect both recognition & tribute.
I cannot claim the title of "harpy" yet. But just wait....
522
posted on
07/15/2003 11:53:37 AM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: Catspaw
Hey, we've been at it MUCH longer than you have; step to the back of the line!
You are up for Honorable Mention though!
523
posted on
07/15/2003 11:57:23 AM PDT
by
Howlin
(I'm a biddie, she's a biddie, wouldn't you like to be a biddie, too?)
To: Catspaw
Here ya go:
To: Catspaw
But are you "petulant" and "dishonest." 'Cause I am. I got called that twice today. Must be the word of the day on his toilet paper.
525
posted on
07/15/2003 11:59:25 AM PDT
by
carton253
(You are free to form your own opinions, but not your own facts.)
To: dirtboy
(AP) White House expected to project record deficit exceeding
$400 Billion.
Now, don't forget, he'a a GOP Conservative.
To: Refinersfire
And Reagan's deficits were huge! Yet, he was a conservative.
527
posted on
07/15/2003 12:03:46 PM PDT
by
carton253
(You are free to form your own opinions, but not your own facts.)
To: Refinersfire
We are at war. Much of that is due to 1. Increased defense spending, and 2. Shortfalls due to the economy.
To: carton253; Howlin; Miss Marple
But are you "petulant" and "dishonest." 'Cause I am. I got called that twice today. Must be the word of the day on his toilet paper."Petulant" is for the young. I am an OLD biddy, really, really old. Almost 60, you know. I've already gone through one cane & shawl set & I'm working on another. <p."Dishonest," of course, is timeless.
529
posted on
07/15/2003 12:05:19 PM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: Catspaw
ROTFLOL!
530
posted on
07/15/2003 12:06:35 PM PDT
by
carton253
(You are free to form your own opinions, but not your own facts.)
To: Miss Marple
Sshhhh!!! Don't spoil it with facts.
531
posted on
07/15/2003 12:07:19 PM PDT
by
carton253
(You are free to form your own opinions, but not your own facts.)
To: carton253
But are you "petulant" and "dishonest." 'Cause I am. I got called that twice today. Must be the word of the day on his toilet paper.Amazing. You just can't drop it after whining that I can't, so I'll chime back in. You were the one who first questioned my honesty, so don't whine about that issue being raised. You seem to think that folks can't go back and review the posting sequence to see who is full of crap, do you?
532
posted on
07/15/2003 12:08:22 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Not enough words in FR taglines to adequately describe the dimensions of Hillary's thunderous thighs)
To: dirtboy
According to Miss Marple's rules of posting courtesy and clear-thinking, whoever uses vulgar terminology first is the loser.
Guess where you fall?
To: dirtboy
I hope they do go back and review the thread. In fact, I welcome it.
And what... I'm not allowed to say I was called petulant and dishonest... Now, you have the right to censor what I post.
LOL!
534
posted on
07/15/2003 12:10:10 PM PDT
by
carton253
(You are free to form your own opinions, but not your own facts.)
To: Matchett-PI
"Those who don't go all out to see to it that G.W.Bush is re-elected will be aiding and abetting America's enemies -- either indirectly, by not voting, or directly, by voting DemocRAT / Third Party."
BullShit.. Plain and simple. You can sit there all day and type such crap, and hope there are people out here that don't read the bills and laws coming out of DC. But it isn't so. While I will give credit to the GOP when and where it has a set of gonads and stands up to Un-Constitutional actions. I can also say that for the Democrats. For in each party (and all walks of life, if one is to be honest) there are good and bad. But to sit back and say One Party is better then the other does not and I will repeat that, does not, take in account that BOTH parties have turn their back to the Constitution and America's founding ideas. And yes, I do know that the GOP, has a "somewhat" better record..but not by much lately.
And to say that we need a larger GOP force to overcome the Democrats is also a lie. They have that % on thier side and what have they done with it? Not much to overcome the assnine laws written by both parties. I'm still waiting to see a roll back on any or all Un-Constitutional Gun Laws...oh wait.. BUSH stood for extending one, if it reaches his desk! (what a cop out, why couldn't he have a set of gonads and stand against this Un-Constitutional action?) What we need is Americans in leadership that care for America FIRST AND FOREMOST, not a damm political party!
To: Marysecretary
"Actually, God told the churches to take care of the needy but they haven't done that either. Government was never supposed to take care of the needy but somehow it's turned into our guardian."
Agreed. But since that isn't happening, what is your solution?
536
posted on
07/15/2003 12:15:38 PM PDT
by
MEGoody
To: Miss Marple
According to Miss Marple's rules of posting courtesy and clear-thinking, whoever uses vulgar terminology first is the loser. Guess where you fall? Hmmm - I used "bullcrap." Pretty vulgar to you, I guess. Meanwhile, the other poster in this exchange says I am not being honest - while admitting that he was deliberately distorting my position.
Nice company you keep.
537
posted on
07/15/2003 12:15:56 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Not enough words in FR taglines to adequately describe the dimensions of Hillary's thunderous thighs)
To: carton253
I didn't always agree with Reagan, either. But un-like Bush.. Ron was up against a Democrat Controled Congress.
To: Refinersfire
Vulgarity doesn't make you correct. The fact of the matter is that a large third party vote will draw support from the GOP and will therefore elect a democrat. That is a fact.
Until you can disprove this fact, agitating for conservative third parties aids the election of a democrat.
To: Miss Marple
And Un-Constitutional Spending....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520, 521-540, 541-560 ... 781-790 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson