Skip to comments.
WILL CONGRESS CLOSE YOUR TRAILS?
[Barbara Boxer's California Wild Heritage Act]
BIKEMAG.COM ^
| July 10, 2003
| Vernon Felton
Posted on 07/10/2003 10:43:48 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last

Cyclists enjoy the fine riding on a trail in Meiss Meadows, southwest of Lake Tahoe.
CLICK HERE for trails that will be lost to the Wilderness.
And now we jump to the East coast into Maine where the town of Millinocket is striking back at the Tinseltown elite who support the creation of a 3.2 million-acre Maine Woods National Park. Residents along with town Manager, Gene Conlogue, believe that the proposed logging and development restrictions will destroy the local economy. Film actors who serve on the park's "advisory panel" are Jeff Bridges, Harrison Ford, Ed Harris, Anthony Hopkins, Holly Hunter, Robert Redford, Ted Danson and Meryl Streep. Town manager, Conlogue, said, This park would be an economic catastrophe for us. Why do some stars get politically meddlesome?
To: All
She wants to look her best for her subjects.
|
>
|
Make a fashion statement. Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
07/10/2003 10:46:08 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: fight_truth_decay
Liberals believe the parks are their private property, that's why. They believe in keeping the riff-raff and street bums out. Is that good enough for you? When it comes to the environment, they are the ultimate elitists.
3
posted on
07/10/2003 10:56:44 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: fight_truth_decay
This isn't all she's up to - I just got an email today from her wanting my support for a new bill she and Diane are plugging - she wants to spend federal money for redoing the missions in CA. Can you believe that! I ask her: what happened to the deficit ..??
4
posted on
07/10/2003 11:11:43 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: goldstategop
Being a novice backpacker, I realy dislike the way the mountiain bikers treat the backcounty. There guidelines/rules of use that, in my experience, most MB'ers don't follow.
5
posted on
07/11/2003 6:15:13 AM PDT
by
john316
(JOSHUA 24:15 ...choose you this day whom ye will serve...)
To: john316
There are MBers who aren't considerate of others who share the trails with them. Most however just want to enjoy the offroad world like every one else, with appreciation for the rights of others and for Nature.
6
posted on
07/11/2003 6:39:45 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
Good point..I guess I shouldn't just lump them all together.
7
posted on
07/11/2003 6:40:55 AM PDT
by
john316
(JOSHUA 24:15 ...choose you this day whom ye will serve...)
To: goldstategop
And the granola-eaters simply don't want anyone else to use "their" little woods.
Nevermind that much of the Western "wilderness" areas are rock-strewn wastelands that it would take a nuclear device to damage - they simply don't want humans to contaminate the landscape.
Even though most Sierra Clubbers never wander more than a five-minute hike from the nearest Starbucks, they don't want you using your SUV to carry you out to where you can actually appreciate the natural wonders of this country
8
posted on
07/11/2003 6:51:28 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: goldstategop
Liberals believe the parks are their private property, that's why. There was a thread a while back showing pictures of their vacation resorts they've built on "protected land."
Only THEY have the right to vacation in those pristeen areas and wallow in its bliss, of course. The great unwashed would be arrested and fined for invading their luxurious vacation resort areas.
To: goldstategop
Well geezzze man look at the pictures! It looks like a nuke went off there. Those damm bikers wreak everything they touch. One picture even had a couple of people in it using the place.
To: CyberAnt
wants to spend federal money for redoing the missions in CAReligiously based missions?
To: fight_truth_decay
To: fight_truth_decay
Environmentalists are seeing red ....Ah. The truth finally comes out.
Dan
13
posted on
07/11/2003 9:10:22 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: fight_truth_decay
BOXER again !! People of California, please VOTE this Feminist OUT of POWER, she's super DANGEROUS. She knows
that alot of Fathers were going there to Relax :) I think
that's a joke, but not sure with BOXER thinking anymore.
14
posted on
07/11/2003 12:16:44 PM PDT
by
Orlando
To: concerned about politics
They're run by some branch of the Catholic Church - I believe! I've been to a few of the missions, and they always have priests there, but I don't know if just one sect owns all the churches or if different sects handle different churches.
15
posted on
07/11/2003 12:31:30 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: Orlando
Boxer is one of the luckiest politicians ever. The ones who could beat her like their congressional seats and she always seems to end up fighting a member of the Republican "bum of the month" club.
To: fight_truth_decay; Kay Ludlow
The parasites are at it again.
17
posted on
07/11/2003 1:22:43 PM PDT
by
StopGlobalWhining
(Vote Bush '04 - Extend "assault weapons" ban - Support Open Borders - S517 US Kyoto - UN Global Gov)
To: fight_truth_decay
We have learned that many so called "wilderness advocacy groups" are back door funded (willing idiot approach) by drug cartels.
We know that some national forests that were designated wilderness (meaning you can only walk or horse ride in) are actually very dangerous for US Citizens because of the drug activity in remote regions now.
Congress (especially the dimocrats) will take money from anyone and do their will.
Let your congress critters know they are supporting the drug cartels by designating more wilderness areas!
18
posted on
07/11/2003 1:34:46 PM PDT
by
Pylot
To: john316
Being a novice backpacker, I realy dislike the way the mountiain bikers treat the backcounty. There guidelines/rules of use that, in my experience, most MB'ers don't follow. I'm a very experienced backpacker. I can't stand the way horses and their riders tear the place up. I'd much rather see a typical biker than typical equestian.
19
posted on
07/11/2003 2:39:10 PM PDT
by
Prof Engineer
(I'm a man, But I can change, If I have to, I guess)
To: Prof Engineer
I'm a novice mountain biker (I do more road and velodrome racing, sometimes on single track with a cyclocross bike). As long a a mountain biker is not trying to leave skidmarks, and is staying on the trail, a mountain biker is going to have much less impact than a horse. But, I'm referencing facts, and environazi liberals use "feelings" (rather nasty at that). I have one environazi neighbor who would go as far as advocating hiking - humans shouldn't infect the wildersness. However this twit also likes "radical depopulation schemes".
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson