Skip to comments.
BOYCOTT WAL-MART OVER GAY AGENDA FOR 4TH OF JULY HOLIDAY FREEP KAREN BURKE 1-479-273-4314
FREE REPUBLIC ^
| July 2, 2003
| the eagle has landed
Posted on 07/02/2003 10:08:52 PM PDT by TheEaglehasLanded
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-291 next last
To: DAnconia55
Incorrect. Only on public property, your own property or With the permission of the owner of whatever private property you are standing on. You call yourself a libertarian and make an asinine statement like that?
Here is a story that contradicts it.
221
posted on
07/03/2003 11:17:53 AM PDT
by
Houmatt
(If it is about what goes on in the bedroom, why doesn't it stay there? And leave our kids alone!)
To: george wythe
We did the Rushmore/Yellowstone/Teton loop for 10 days.
Stopped in a Wal-Mart lot on 2 nights, one on the way out at like 1:00 am, and once on the way home at like 2:30am.
Slept til about 8 or 9, then went into the store and bought some snacks/food as our way to say thank you.
222
posted on
07/03/2003 11:34:38 AM PDT
by
Johnny Gage
(The key to flying, is to throw yourself to the ground.............AND MISS!)
To: tdadams
Really? Can you tell me any biological purpose for a dog to hump legs? LOL!
One, according to our vet, is that it is a way male dogs attempt to establish dominance. The same reason a neutered male still attempts to hump another dog, it's the "alpha male" thing.
223
posted on
07/03/2003 11:37:22 AM PDT
by
Johnny Gage
(The key to flying, is to throw yourself to the ground.............AND MISS!)
To: breakem
I'll tell you one of my personal favorite tactics of the people you're talking about. They'll rant for 10 straight posts about how, since sexual activity is not an inherent characteristic (like race), it deserves no attention at all when talking about discrimination.
Then, a few posts later, they'll start complaining about how someone is discriminating against them based on their religion. Gee, I didn't realize people were born with religious characteristics! Clearly, people don't choose their religion; they're just born that way, so you can't discriminate. However, it's OK to discriminate against those dang queers, since they've chosen their immoral lifestyle.
224
posted on
07/03/2003 11:47:40 AM PDT
by
LanPB01
To: I got the rope
Those of us that are real conservatives care. What type of civilization will we have when it is filled with moral anarchists? So believing in equal treatment under the law when it comes to employment and housing, for people who's sex lives we happen to disagree with...now makes us "moral anarchists"?
You've got to be kidding.
Don't preach to us about what it means to be conservative.
It's the gay obsessed moral hypocrites who want to police people's bedrooms who should be out of a job.
225
posted on
07/03/2003 11:48:12 AM PDT
by
Jorge
To: Clint N. Suhks
Sodomy IS NOT sex. That's what Bill Clinton said.
226
posted on
07/03/2003 11:49:35 AM PDT
by
Jorge
To: Clint N. Suhks
I boycott Wal-Mart because Wal-Mart sucks. They sell crap, their stores are crap, I can't deal with the crap service or the shoeless rubes who infest the dirty place.
That said, I'm amazed at your irrational obsession with gay people. As any college freshman who took an intro psych course knows, this obviously shows your own secret desires. The fact that WalMart is now not firing workers because they happen to be gay doesn't affect me (or you, in reality) one iota. Your obsession is unhealthy.
Btw, I'm anxiously awaiting your response to the question about lezzie (real or porno-fake) kisses/sex. As a real man, I can state that I unequivocably enjoy seeing that stuff every now and again.
And have we all forgotten that sodomy applies to straight oral and butt sex too?
To sum up, who cares?
To: DAnconia55; Clint N. Suhks; scripter; RAT Patrol; viaveritasvita; ArGee; GrandMoM
No, your assbackwards knuckledragging reactionary bile is about trying to FORCE Gays to not be gay in their own houses. The point was evidently lost on both of you. Okay. Let's see if I have this right: Those who took exception to the Gay Rights Rally in Washington, DC in March of 1993 were trying to force themselves onto the homosexuals. Got it.
(And yes, we DO have a right to privacy - see Amendments 9 and 10.)
Strange, neither amendment says anything about a right to privacy, implied or outright. It was the Supreme Court, by coincidence, that created the "right to privacy," in Roe v Wade.
Extremist Gays were pushing their education agenda anyway. So they wouldn't have stopped if you HAD won the SC ruling. And just because they ARE pushing an Agenda is no moral right to deny them equal protection of the law.
I can't help but get the impression all of this begins and ends with homosexual sodomy as far as you are concerned. Is it correct to make that assumption?
Nonsense. No more than saying that all us straight men are child molestors because of a few Catholic priests. This is known as a 'red herring' - another logic flaw.
Have fun explaining away NAMBLA.
And you're now up in arms because gay people are daring to work to support themselves.
I never said that. If homosexuals wish to work, that's fine. But they don't have a right to work. They do not have the right to marry. They do not have the right to adopt. Nobody has that right. And yet, especially with the last two, that is what they want. So the idea of "equal rights" or "civil rights" is just a sham.
228
posted on
07/03/2003 11:57:18 AM PDT
by
Houmatt
(If it is about what goes on in the bedroom, why doesn't it stay there? And leave our kids alone!)
To: tdadams
"Can you tell me any biological purpose for a dog to hump legs?"
You have attempted to set up a strawman. Your silly statement has nothing to do with my pointing out that you implied gays are no more intelligent than dogs.
By the way, 'humping' among dogs is often an attempt to dominiate. If your dog is humping your leg, he is working at displacing you as the alpha. Get some dogs together and observe their behavior for awhile. Won't take long for you to see this.
229
posted on
07/03/2003 12:00:11 PM PDT
by
MEGoody
To: Johnny Gage
"that it is a way male dogs attempt to establish dominance."
Females will do it as well.
230
posted on
07/03/2003 12:02:10 PM PDT
by
MEGoody
To: TheEaglehasLanded
Oh yeah, I'm so worried about MalMart twinkies getting benefits. As if the fact that the Chinese slap us right in the kisser with "Faded Glory" clothing and all the other chicrap that WalMart sells isn't enough reason to stay the hell away from their stores...
To: breakem
Of course, you can't discuss lowering the age of consent on the ole FR because you are labelled as a pedophile or pushing the gaystapo agenda. And because the only other people talking about it are these guys.
So you do so at your own peril.
232
posted on
07/03/2003 12:16:06 PM PDT
by
Houmatt
(If it is about what goes on in the bedroom, why doesn't it stay there? And leave our kids alone!)
To: Dave S
see post #221
233
posted on
07/03/2003 12:30:07 PM PDT
by
Houmatt
(If it is about what goes on in the bedroom, why doesn't it stay there? And leave our kids alone!)
To: Houmatt
Thanks for the ping.
I am actually with Wal-Mart on this one. If they don't discriminate against their heterosexual employees who sleep around they should not discriminate against their homosexual employees either.
That said, I still don't understand why Wal-Mart would even know since this is supposed to be about what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own homes. Why is Wal-Mart involved if they aren't poking each other in the store?
Shalom.
234
posted on
07/03/2003 12:38:50 PM PDT
by
ArGee
(If you can read this your computer may be infected with a virus.)
To: DAnconia55
I got pinged to this conversation a little late. Sorry about jumping in.
You are trying to FORCE gays to not have sex in their own homes.
The word that intrigues me here is your use of the word "force" as in "by force of law."
I think if you split the world into two camps - gay supportive and anti-gay - and looked at the laws each is proposing, the gay supportive are the ones who are attempting to force everyone to do something. The Christians aren't the zealots who want government to control your life, the gays are.
Shalom.
235
posted on
07/03/2003 12:41:11 PM PDT
by
ArGee
(If you can read this your computer may be infected with a virus.)
To: whattajoke
As any college freshman who took an intro psych course knows, this obviously shows your own secret desires.Hehehe
You must have in the dorm hitting your bong when they were discussing Freudian Projection
but anyway. Do you accuse those who speak out against abortion, euthanasia, legalizing drugs, atheism, gambling, prostitution, moral relativism, the Liberaltarian social experiment, et al debilitating and otherwise negative affects to our society and culture as being irrationally obsessive??? Well do you punk? Of course you dont. Why? Because you are a hypocrite!
But then again geniuses like you whod rather pay more for their AA shot shells at the local gun shop or white socks at Nordstroms than shopping at Wal-Mart probably dont have the capacity to comment on behavioral pathologies and their affect on society.
whattajoke is a perfect screen name for you.
To: Jorge
That's what Bill Clinton said. He said sexual relations. Sex is coitus, the only thing those who pretend an anus is a vagina can reproduce are dirt babies. .
To: TheEaglehasLanded
Hold on. Just because they explicitly say they won't discriminate against someone because they're gay...this is a reason to boycott? Look, I don't care if the person stocking the shelves is gay--I just want my tupperware to be reasonably priced.
I am a strong conservative, but I do not agree with you. Of course if you think a boycott is justified, then go for it.
I've got co-workers who are gay. What do I do: refuse to talk with them? Associate? Some are better employees than some "straight-laced, religious" co-workers.
We're not talking about buying a militant, pro-gay marriage agenda here. We're talking about having a workplace where people can earn a living.
238
posted on
07/03/2003 12:49:39 PM PDT
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: oceanperch
Sure.....but I'm a capitalist......for a small fee!
To: whattajoke
I boycott Wal-Mart because Wal-Mart sucks. They sell crap, their stores are crap, I can't deal with the crap service or the shoeless rubes who infest the dirty place. Not our Wal-Mart. It's clean, the employees are helpful...and I get the exact same brandname products sold in other stores, only at much lower prices.
I save at least $50-$60/month shopping at Wal-Mart.
240
posted on
07/03/2003 12:54:46 PM PDT
by
Jorge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-291 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson