Skip to comments.
SCOTUS strikes down Texas sodomy ban
FOXnews
Posted on 06/26/2003 7:08:23 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 1,721-1,734 next last
To: AntiGuv
Entirely expected. Did Breyer issue the Opinion of the Court?? It was Kennedy, joined by Breyer, Souter, Stevens and Ginsburg. O'Connor issued a separate concurring opinion.
461
posted on
06/26/2003 9:27:25 AM PDT
by
steveegg
(Close only counts in horseshoes, hand grenades, air-burst artillery and thermonuclear weapons)
To: OWK
Since you are basically promising a foolish blither in response, I make no presumption that you will take a bit of heed to what I say. But rights are the things that our Creator has chosen to vouchsafe to us that we may claim. No more, no less. That's the attitude that the Declaration of Independence took.
Now you go ahead and blither out what you think rights are. Oh, and go to the mirror and visit your fan club whilst doing so.
To: BlackjackHF
Where'd td say that pedophilia was good? Be specific.
To: Thane_Banquo
I can see it now, a whole new line of candy from Nestle's or some other: 'Chicken Lollipops'.
464
posted on
06/26/2003 9:27:56 AM PDT
by
hardhead
('Curly, if you say it's a fine morning, I'll shoot you.' - John Wayne, 'McLintock' 1963)
To: MJY1288
Damn those slack-jawed Patagonian Libertarian parrots.
465
posted on
06/26/2003 9:27:59 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
To: BlackjackHF
I don't care if you call me names. I was just pointing out the fact that you didn't address me when you did it. It's about formalities, moron.
I wont because the 2nd amendment protects my right to bear arms.
But then the second amendment must supercede democracy huh? That was my point all along, simpleton.
I would love for you to show me where in the constitution it says the SC can dictate what is moral. What is that, Article 8? Idiota.
It doesnt state that anywhere. This ruling didnt make any statements regarding the morality of any sexual behavior. It basically stated that it is not the governments business to legislate such behavior between consenting adults. Twit.
466
posted on
06/26/2003 9:27:59 AM PDT
by
dead
To: mikenola
What a man, a woman, a midget and a donkey do in the privacy of their bedroom is none of my business!
467
posted on
06/26/2003 9:28:08 AM PDT
by
ffusco
Comment #468 Removed by Moderator
To: The Red Zone
C'mon hotshot.
You talk a big game until someone asks you to actually think.
What are rights?
What are their extent?
What are their limitations?
Define them.
469
posted on
06/26/2003 9:28:19 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: Chancellor Palpatine
Where'd td say that pedophilia was good? If he or she is a Libertaarian, it is implied.
470
posted on
06/26/2003 9:29:00 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
To: OWK
I already answered. You are so slow.
To: Tribune7
Forgive if this is already posted in the 450 or so posts that follow yours, but in a rare veto override a year or two ago, the Hawaii legislature changed the age of consent to 16 (provided the perp is at least 5 years older). So a 19yo can still get it on with a 15yo without consequences to the 19yo but a 21yo can't.
472
posted on
06/26/2003 9:29:45 AM PDT
by
Spyder
(Just another day in Paradise)
To: ffusco
What a man, a woman, a midget and a donkey do in the privacy of their bedroom is none of my business!Unless, of course, they damage the scuba gear.
473
posted on
06/26/2003 9:29:49 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
Comment #474 Removed by Moderator
To: realpatriot
Yes, no, no, we'll see.
475
posted on
06/26/2003 9:30:15 AM PDT
by
ffusco
To: Liberal Classic
This is a right to equal protection under law and to be secure in their persons and houses. There you go with those "fact" things again. Everyone knows this is a thread to bash Libertarians and to try and paint anyone who approves of this decision as a rapist and a child molestor.
476
posted on
06/26/2003 9:30:32 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Lazamataz
> We also cause plaque build-up on your teeth. I always wondered who caused that. Now I know -- Libertarians.
ROTFLMAO To cure this condition, chew on a Lieberal.
477
posted on
06/26/2003 9:31:05 AM PDT
by
steveegg
(Close only counts in horseshoes, hand grenades, air-burst artillery and thermonuclear weapons)
To: Lazamataz
No comment! I'm already fighting three people on this thread alone!
478
posted on
06/26/2003 9:31:05 AM PDT
by
dead
To: GreatOne
But... But .... But Prostitution is between two 'consenting ' adults. We should permit it /sarcasim
479
posted on
06/26/2003 9:31:25 AM PDT
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: The Red Zone
rights are the things that our Creator has chosen to vouchsafe to us that we may claim. No more, no less But WHICH things?
Which things did he vouchsafe?
What are they?
How do we know?
Surely the creator was not such a profound practical jokester as to vouchsafe this thing called rights for us, and then fail to tell us specifically what they are... was he?
What are those rights? Where did the creator define them for us?
Be specific please.
480
posted on
06/26/2003 9:31:40 AM PDT
by
OWK
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 1,721-1,734 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson