Skip to comments.
Eric Rudolph Captured
CNN
| May 31,2003
| Vinnie
Posted on 05/31/2003 5:02:27 AM PDT by Vinnie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 1,121-1,123 next last
To: Godebert
And you need to abusively grill me about my views on abortion because?
I'm against abortion. What's it to you?
161
posted on
05/31/2003 6:59:03 AM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: Hacksaw
Oh Goodness, I didn't know that. I can se why you don't like her. That being said, that doesn't in any way justify Rudolph.
To: ConservativeMan55
163
posted on
05/31/2003 7:00:34 AM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: rebel
"It appears that the days of questioning law enforcement went away with the election of Bush. FR sure has changed! "
Questioning is one thing. You appear to assume that, by definition, the FBI is lying and merely arresting someone without any evidence at all. You lose credibility when making that kind of cynical pronouncement. Not that the FBI is beyond reproach but I prefer to wait until I hear some verifiable facts before I accuse.
That is my major bitch about FR. All to many of our group jump to the most radical conclusions based on absolutely NO evidence. Any plane crash is a 'terrorist attack' and the powers are all covering it up.
How many times have we seen this one in the last 1 1/2 years?
So many experts, so little fact!
164
posted on
05/31/2003 7:00:44 AM PDT
by
lawdude
(Liberalism: A failure every time it is tried.)
To: Freee-dame
But HOPEFULLY this will divert our press from being 100% fixated on the Laci Peterson story. I am so sick and tired of that left coast circus.. this will be a relief.
165
posted on
05/31/2003 7:00:47 AM PDT
by
bosshog
To: Godebert; Catspaw
Neither was there any mention of your views on abortion. Are you or are you not Pro-Abortion?I t's a simple question. Are you unwilling to answer it for any particular reason? If I was Catspaw, I wouldn't answer your question merely because of the imperious, McCarthyesque manner in which you are asking. Besides, it's not a simple question. One man's "pro-life" is another man's "pro-abortion". Witness the acrimony that arises between pro-life people when a pregnant retarded rape victim is involved.
166
posted on
05/31/2003 7:00:47 AM PDT
by
wimpycat
('Nemo me impune lacessit')
To: TommyDale
If it's proven that he is innocent, you are going to look really stupid. At least use the word "alleged" or "suspected". You write as though you work for CNN or the New York Times.Gee, telling me to use "alleged" or "suspected" sounds like you work for CNN or the New York Times.
167
posted on
05/31/2003 7:01:46 AM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: Catspaw
Go ahead and write as though he is guilty -- you are opening yourself up to a libel case.
To: faithincowboys
They use it but it is so predictable and so trite.The left isn't the only voice in town anymore!
169
posted on
05/31/2003 7:04:01 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: TommyDale
Oh, goody, TommyDale, you got it right: it's libel when it's written, slander when it's spoken. And I'd love a lawsuit. Depositions can be so much fun.
170
posted on
05/31/2003 7:04:39 AM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: ConservativeMan55
It also underscores how a fugitive in our backyard without Osama's millions or firepower can evade law enforcement for so long. This will undoubtedly discredit the constant carping of the Rats. Today Americans are reminded how difficult finding wanted persons is. This is a good get for so many reasons!
To: Catspaw
"I'm against abortion. What's it to you?"So I take it you're saying that you are "personally" against abortion, but you support a woman's "right" to abort her baby? Would that be a correct interpretation of your view? If not....please feel free to clarify your position on the law that allows women to murder their babies.
To: wimpycat
If I was Catspaw, I wouldn't answer your question merely because of the imperious, McCarthyesque manner in which you are asking. Except it was in the same style as his/her questions.
173
posted on
05/31/2003 7:06:12 AM PDT
by
Hacksaw
To: elfman2
Abortion clinics are death camps. They systematicaly kill innocent human beings.
No matter what process legalized this it is evil. It must be opposed.
Opposing it in "the system" has allowed many millions of innocents to die. Just because we have a more just system does not let us off the hook.
The abortion industry has clothed itself in legal technicalities and far to many Amercians have bought into it.
The Nazis were just not as good as american leftists at convincing americans to lay down and be a good little sheep. They hid their death camps. The german citizens did not even know they were there.
We americans know they are there and allow them to continue.
Think about it.
174
posted on
05/31/2003 7:08:39 AM PDT
by
rebel
To: Hacksaw
Exactly.
175
posted on
05/31/2003 7:08:49 AM PDT
by
Amore
(La vita e una cagna . . .)
To: Godebert
No need to clarify You can assume whatever you want. You've already prejudged me, so it really doesn't make any difference.
176
posted on
05/31/2003 7:08:59 AM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: monocle
The Democrats who rail against Bush for not capturing Bin Laden should be reminded time and time again about this analogy. Yep....though its silly, petty and irrelevant (much like the Democratic Party) the point should be made that Clinton couldn't catch him....Bush did.
Only the idiots will swallow it...but they tend to vote Democratic so if we can swing them over....fine.
To: faithincowboys
Yes ,a good point.
178
posted on
05/31/2003 7:09:33 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: wimpycat
I'm not really interested in carrying on a debate with a leftist like yourself. Your un-American, anti-gun and pro-abortion views are well known on this forum. That a rabid leftist like yourself is allowed to remain here on FR is rather unusual.
To: Overtaxed
Thanks for the ping!! This was my morning to sleep late.
180
posted on
05/31/2003 7:12:34 AM PDT
by
Constitution Day
(**FOX NEWS ALERT** Scott Peterson had Corn Flakes for breakfast! **THIS HAS BEEN A FOX NEWS ALERT**)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 1,121-1,123 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson