Skip to comments.
Are whites cleverer than blacks?
The Spectator - UK ^
| May 24, 2003
| Sean Thomas
Posted on 05/23/2003 5:16:08 PM PDT by UnklGene
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-133 next last
To: SHOCKNAWE
It's true enough that IQ by itself is not enough for a lot of endeavors, but it's also true that there are many endeavors that absolutely require a certain level of IQ.
To: UnklGene
Personally, I think that anyone, not caught up in a I'm a victim mode of thinking, can live up to their full potential. Exactly what that potential is depends on the person. However, people can't realize that by claiming that tests are biased or racist and insisting that a lower standard be applied to them on the basis of race.
To: Aliska
You are exactly right. Most of the difference between black and white IQs, IMO, is due to early childhood. I believe that people are born with a range of potential IQ and only some have the stimulation needed to get it into the higher range. Unfortunate.
To: UnklGene
I want to get to where we are judged by the content of our character, not by the color of our skin.
By the way, I am 'White' (or so that you couldn't tell the difference by looking at me).
64
posted on
05/23/2003 6:36:16 PM PDT
by
LibKill
(MOAB, the greatest advance in Foreign Relations since the cat-o'-nine-tails!)
To: UnklGene
ping
To: FreeperinRATcage
Well said. This is the point I always try to make when this topic of discussion arises. It is painfully obvious that there are numerous white idiots and refreshingly pleasing to see those such as Condoleezza (sp? guess my IQ is lower than I thought)Rice and Clarence Thomas demonstrate the potential of humans of all races (this potential just kills those on the left, hence the "house n---er" and "I hope he dies of heart disease" comments from the leadership of the left). Averages such as these have no real value other than for academics, at least in societies in which individual ability controls over mere cosmetics.
66
posted on
05/23/2003 6:41:12 PM PDT
by
NCLaw441
To: aristeides
Affirmative action falls of its own weight. Findings of disparity of intelligence based on race aren't necessary.
67
posted on
05/23/2003 6:43:00 PM PDT
by
NCLaw441
To: tubebender
When was the last time you signed a 90 million dollar contract with Nike.... The last time I negotiated the deal to double or triple the deal.
68
posted on
05/23/2003 6:43:49 PM PDT
by
shiva
To: UnklGene
My response to this article is Who Cares!
Don't take it personal.
To: katnip
Thanks, katnip!
To: mrfixit514
Now the question is: are all of the approximately 100 faculty members of our school prejudice? Or is it true that our black population does not perform at the same level as our white students?I think that there probably is some substance to studies that predict racial differences and IQ. But there are other things to consider that IQ tests have a hard time measuring.
As a rule, IQ tests measure conceptual ability. Conceptual ability is very important, but not EVERYTHING. There are other kinds of smarts.
Just about everyone's favorite president, Ronald Reagan, was no prize winner when it came to math and science, but in political science he was way ahead of Jimmy Carter (who WAS an ace in math and science).
When you are considering the probability of your students achieving successful careers, one factor you might want to look at as being highly important is "attitude." The students who are DRIVEN to use whatever tools they have are the most likely to succeed. Some of the conceptual giants will end up throwing garbage into trucks for a living, some of those who struggle through remedial math will end up as the future leaders.
To: UnklGene
Professor Richard Lynns IQ and the Wealth of Nations (Greenwood Press, 2002)Interesting hint here that the degree of competition and the spectrum of the population open to competition may be related to the average IQ. In sub-Sahara Africa, the struggle for existance is severe and constant but the individual does not have any future beyond mere life and little to say about that even, the IQ is less meaningful and thus low. In a relatively free society where cleverness can mean a better existance, IQ's are high. A socialist state, where there are limits both on how far you can fall and how far you can advance, IQ's are somewhere in the middle. In the USA, who lives is the socialist/welfare state (African Americans) and who lives in the free state (Whites & Asians) -- Hispanics are somewhere in between. Just a thought -- don't shoot.
72
posted on
05/23/2003 7:00:52 PM PDT
by
JimSEA
Comment #73 Removed by Moderator
Comment #74 Removed by Moderator
To: jimt
According to Neal Boortz at
http://www.boortz.com - today's issue our public schools are designed to breed stupid people who vote for the rats. Here's a bit of what he says with a really interesting link attached to it:
THE ANTI-ACHIEVEMENT MENTALITY
Yesterday you heard me give a list of some of the things that Im passionate about. My family tops the list .. then comes freedom, both economic and social. Number three would be education. I truly believe that an uneducated populace is not capable of preserving freedom. Ignorant people are easily led and dominated.
There is no doubt in the world that our system of government education is an unqualified disaster. Is it at all possible that this is by design rather than by happenstance? Our education system is controlled by Democrats. Teachers unions overwhelmingly vote Democrat and about 90% of their political contributions go to Democrat candidates. Now --- another fact. The dumber you are; or, if you prefer, the more ignorant you are, the more likely it is you are going to vote Democrat. Can you see, then, that Democrats have a vested interest in making sure that our schools dont do the job?
There is one group of Americans that Democrats know they can absolutely count on year after year after year for their votes. Black Americans. These same black Americans are being poorly served by our government schools. Again .. is this by design?
Today Im going to discuss an article that explores why black children from rich families perform so poorly in the upscale suburban schools of Shaker Heights, Ohio. You may want to read the article when you hear the discussion. So
heres your link.
http://www.eastbayexpress.com/issues/2003-05-21/feature.html/1/index.html
75
posted on
05/23/2003 7:22:41 PM PDT
by
kcar
(T)
To: section9
The jury is way out on that one.
76
posted on
05/23/2003 7:43:18 PM PDT
by
gcruse
(Vice is nice, but virtue can hurt you. --Bill Bennett)
To: All
In respect to affirmative action and educational selection and achievement in general, if one assumes the following findings are correct --Average Jewish IQ is 110-115, Average European White is 100, Average Korean-Chinese-Japanese is 108, average Aferican-American (actually 20% white) is 85--you can easily project what will happen on the average in a college setting.
Remember, it takes, on the average, at least an IQ of 110 to function in most professions including medicine, law, engineering and so forth; hence you will find Jews will have 60% or more above 110, Whites 20%, Asians 40%, and African Americans about 5%.
All of the figures cited are well known. The only disputes about the importance of IQ'S in education, income and even health and longevity occur with between non-scientist scholars, politicians and those that have special pleadings at heart.
If nothing else, we can learn that the reason Jews (I am not a Jew) have such a tough time and are regularly persecuted is not because they are failures but that they are successes in a civilized society. I guess God meant it when he described them as his chosen people.
To: UnklGene
Don't know about clever except in the sense of devious, but everybody knows he is crazy insane. On a good day.
78
posted on
05/23/2003 7:47:39 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
To: Bogey78O
>Cleverer?
Brits. They speak that other language, English, you know:-)
79
posted on
05/23/2003 7:47:45 PM PDT
by
Celantro
To: FreeperinRATcage
"Are we then to assume that simply because a person is black, that they are of low IQ? Or if a person is asian, that they are automatically smarter?"
No of course not.
But you can assume that if a person is black it is more probable that he is less smart than an asian, or put the other way if a person is asian it is more probable that he is smarter than a black. These are probabilities, they do not determine which of two individuals is smarter, only which is more likely to be smarter.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-133 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson