Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MP may be tried as traitor (Galloway)
The Observer (U.K.) ^ | 04/27/03 | Antony Barnett and Martin Bright

Posted on 04/26/2003 4:54:01 PM PDT by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 04/26/2003 4:54:01 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"This latest twist comes as The Observer reveals details of a secret trip Galloway made to Morocco for the British-based Saudi dissident Saad al-Fagih, an Islamic fundamentalist who purchased a satellite phone used by al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. "

Now isn't that interesting.
2 posted on 04/26/2003 5:01:11 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Oh my... just keeps getting worse for Galloway, doesn't it? :-)
3 posted on 04/26/2003 5:01:49 PM PDT by Tamzee (Logic and reason are the mortal enemy of the Left...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Human rights lawyers said last night it would be an extremely difficult case to pursue. Roger Bingham of the civil rights group Liberty said: 'Galloway's statement is an expression of opinion. We live in a free-speech, democratic society and elect MPs to speak out on national issues.'

Oh, puh-leeze. Where did these "lawyers" get their licenses---Wal-Mart?

Not all speech is "free" or created equal.

4 posted on 04/26/2003 5:04:28 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Do not play chess with George W. Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
And this is totally apart from the funds he obviously received from the Butcher of Baghdad.
5 posted on 04/26/2003 5:04:59 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; MadIvan
Can a treason statue come into play here? The incitement charge doesn't seem strong enough.
6 posted on 04/26/2003 5:06:20 PM PDT by pbear8 ( sed libera nos a malo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
This proposal to prosecute is part of an ever-expanding witch-hunt against George Galloway because he was the most vocal anti-war voice.'

Perhaps M. Galloway may appear nude on the cover of the Economist with words of treachery stenciled on his pasty skin.

Then he can get the Vichy Chix to hold benefit concerts for his legal defense fund.

7 posted on 04/26/2003 5:06:43 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Do not play checkers with George W. Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
He should change his name to Gaulloway, pun intended.
8 posted on 04/26/2003 5:09:35 PM PDT by adam_az
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Keeps getting better and better.

5.56mm

9 posted on 04/26/2003 5:11:35 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Can ye say "Lord Haw-Haw"?
There, I ken ye could.
10 posted on 04/26/2003 5:12:23 PM PDT by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Dig a hole, Georgie. BTW, the US could try a few people for treason too.
11 posted on 04/26/2003 5:13:13 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
FYI-
Going Down!
12 posted on 04/26/2003 5:16:33 PM PDT by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
'I hope to have chiselled on my gravestone: "He incited them to disaffect."'

It likely will be.

13 posted on 04/26/2003 5:20:13 PM PDT by Savage Beast (Peace is the prerogative of the powerful. The path to peace is confrontation, not appeasement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I remember very clearly back in the old days before the Admin Moderators could remove offensive remarks, two of the most fundamental rules in FreeRepublic were: Don't advocate the death of a president or other politician, even as a joke; and 2) don't incite the military to disobey orders.

Some Freepers carelessly made such jokes about clinton, and a few found the Secret Service or the FBI calling on them.

The Brits have much stricter laws on these matters than we do. I should think there might be some chance of convicting Galloway, especially since it appears that he was paid by the enemy to make these kinds of statements. That might be enough to tip the balance for a jury.
14 posted on 04/26/2003 5:23:28 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
After the guilty verdict, hang him in the Tower.
15 posted on 04/26/2003 5:24:33 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
'I hope to have chiselled on my gravestone: "He incited them to disaffect."'


Be carefull what you ask for, the Lord may give it to you
16 posted on 04/26/2003 5:25:26 PM PDT by blastdad51 (Proud father of an Enduring Freedom vet, and friend of a soldier lost in Afghanistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
'If any person maliciously and advisedly endeavours to seduce any member of His Majesty's forces from his duty or allegiance to His Majesty, he shall be guilty of an offence.' Under the terms of the Act, the word 'maliciously' means wilfully and intentionally.

hehehehehe. (One on the way down and others will follow. This makes my day.)

17 posted on 04/26/2003 5:29:48 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG
Oh, puh-leeze. Where did these "lawyers" get their licenses---Wal-Mart?
Not all speech is "free" or created equal.

There is no First Amendment in Britain.
There is not even a prohibition of Ex Post Facto Laws.

Parliment could pass a new law against something he did, and then try him for breaking the law that wasn't even in existance at the time he commited the act.

He's Toast.

So9

18 posted on 04/26/2003 5:44:47 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine (We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The maximum penalty is two years in jail.

Boy. They really take treason seriously, don't they?

Actually, I would not believe any anonymously sourced article in the Guardian, especially for the Sunday front page. More likely, there is some law against a MP being in the pay of a foreign power, and they'll nail him on that. Hopefully sentencing can take into account that the UK was at war with said foreign power (which has been true for the past 12 years due to no fly zone defense).

19 posted on 04/26/2003 5:48:25 PM PDT by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
It's Tyburn Tree Time!!!
20 posted on 04/26/2003 5:51:38 PM PDT by wardaddy (Hootie (not of Blowfish) to head EEOC...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson