The Death of Right & Wrong: Epilogue

FrontpageMagazine.com ^ | April 22, 2003 | Tammy Bruce

[Flipper4]

I could not agree more. I am a member of the right-wing conspiracy but I get pretty tired of some of ours always popping off boilerplate without any consideration that perhaps some people are trying to change and get better with certain things.

[Flipper4]

I've heard her say numerous times she is a big Free Republic fan. This new book is really outstanding -- and scary, frankly.

[anniegetyourgun]

Why is it 'scary'? Whoops....there I go again...asking one of those right-wing conspiracy questions!

[Flipper4]

I completely agree. One of the reasons I think this book is important is because you have the issue of anti-Leftist moral relativism broached by someone who is not traditionally in the conservative mode. She is a very good and articulate vehicle to push the conservative point of view that she has come to embrace in many respects despite not necessarily seeing herself as a conservative.

[Flipper4]

Read the book and you'll see. The Left is sick and she details exactly how and why.

[Flipper4]

On the contrary she has condemned NOW in very strong terms

[anniegetyourgun]

Thanks, I think I will.

[Flipper4]

You made an assinine statement and expected a response

[Flipper4]

Amen

[fr_freak]

You're pathetic. This site clearly indicates that garbage like that has no place here - no matter what your opinion

No class....

I think this is a bit of an overreaction here. While the comment about Bruce's mannish appearance may be a little insulting, I really don't think it warrants this harsh of a reaction. There is even a chance the question may be legitimate curiosity. I have seen far worse things said about people like that idiot Michael Moore on other threads.

I have read the guidelines for posting on this site and I don't think annie's comment or question violates it in the least. I am much more concerned that you have appointed yourselves the Comment Police and decided that your appointment gives you the authority to attack people in this forum directly. I would prefer a forum that allows for a little levity which may push the limits of good taste now and then over a forum where people must walk on eggshells.

[anniegetyourgun]

Is the fact that she is a lesbian assinine, or did my question about whether or not she was also a transgender bother you?

[Flipper4]

That she is a lesbian is obvious; the rest doesn't even approach legitimate conversation.

[anniegetyourgun]

Are you sure you aren't 'projecting' with that last comment, Flipper?

[anniegetyourgun]

#52, that is?

[anniegetyourgun]

Well then, I apologize for asking the question so that I might more accurately portray her to the individual who told me that at one time. I suppose it would have been better for me to pass along the rumor?

I think you're wound a bit tight, Flip. I'll not bother you again.

[Flipper4]

You don't bother me. You amuse me

[Question_Assumptions]

Give her time and be nice. She's come this far. After all, look how far Norma McCorvey had to go.

[GoreIsLove]

she sure looks like she may have been a male at one time

i stand by my original statement. it's an ad hominem attack that has nothing to do with the article, other than demonstrating her point.

[Question_Assumptions]

Part of the key is to leave abortion laws up to the states. Liberals are concentrated and we may "lose" those states to very pro-choice laws if Roe is overturned. But the conservative states that could do a good job of enforcing anti-abortion laws would be able to pass them.