Skip to comments.
Why are we sending Teenage Girls into the Battle Zone?
AP (Yahoo News) ^
Posted on 03/26/2003 9:07:50 AM PST by optik_b
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420, 421-431 last
To: optik_b
Teenage girls are allowed into combat zones because people do not care enough to keep them out. Every teenage girl
that goes into combat allows a male to hang out at malls and shop for new nose and ear rings. America is in trouble when men step back and allow wives, mothers and sisters to
fight wars. IMHO.
To: optik_b
So none of you guys have a problem with sending teenage girls into combat zones? How about you gals? Do you see a problem with sending teenage boys into combat zones?
This is as far as I care to read your thread.
422
posted on
03/28/2003 4:33:15 AM PST
by
leadpenny
(OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM)
To: Hodar; Reagan Man
I think you know better than to ask the question the way you did.
It's clear that the issue of 'women in combat' is NOT a question of women's patriotism, nor of women's capability to serve the country in some fashion--even in the Armed Forces (e.g., WWI and WWII.)
The question is whether the Clinton/Feminazi agenda of "pure equality" is right-minded.
One only needs to examine the sponsors of this "pure equality" doctrine to form a few valid preliminary conclusions.
423
posted on
03/28/2003 6:58:04 AM PST
by
ninenot
To: Ditto
We have been doing it for 2 centuries. Ever hear of Molly Picture? That is Molly PITCHER, because of the pitcher she carried.
424
posted on
03/28/2003 7:02:18 AM PST
by
Hacksaw
(She's not that kind of girl, Booger.)
To: Ga Rob
Correct analysis.
If the women are all assigned to HQ/rear-area support BY POLICY, that's fine. Yes, there will be casualties, but at least they will be 'unintended consequences' rather than putting them in real and present danger up front.
425
posted on
03/28/2003 7:07:45 AM PST
by
ninenot
To: Claire Voyant
No my cousin in the gulf is a man in the Army infantry. From what he's told me he's not actually in the battle zone yet, but he will be very soon...
426
posted on
03/28/2003 8:51:02 AM PST
by
optik_b
To: optik_b
Of course you're right. We shouldn't send females into battle, whether they want to go out of genuine zeal or out of economic desparation or whatever. Our leaders should just say No Thank You.
To: optik_b
Bush wants the female, feminist vote.
428
posted on
03/29/2003 7:45:52 PM PST
by
Coleus
(RU-486 Kills Babies)
To: optik_b
JUST HEARD ON THE NEWS THAT Jessica Lynch HAS BEEN RESCUED!!!
429
posted on
04/01/2003 4:45:24 PM PST
by
optik_b
(Arnett is the enemy)
To: optik_b
"So none of you guys have a problem with sending teenage girls into combat zones? "
It's disgusting...women don't belong on the front lines.
Ed
430
posted on
04/01/2003 5:08:52 PM PST
by
Sir_Ed
To: optik_b
bttt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420, 421-431 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson