Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Doctors Might Be Treating Saddam In Bunker
Yahoo/USA Today ^ | 3-25-2003 | Jack Kelley

Posted on 03/25/2003 6:14:21 PM PST by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: piasa
4 to 6 day stop Ordered by Franks...

Cool aid anyone?
61 posted on 03/28/2003 9:26:41 PM PST by dinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: dinok
'preciate your thoughts & the time you took to say it. I won't have time today to try more analysis, and I don't think there's much more to say for now.

Please stay in touch as this thing progresses.
-Nicollo
62 posted on 03/29/2003 5:00:54 AM PST by nicollo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: blam
Was it a head wound?
63 posted on 03/29/2003 5:08:32 AM PST by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinok
No pause per Centcom. You bit on a Reuters story.
64 posted on 03/29/2003 5:08:35 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: dinok
Well, except for the history student part, I don't have your qualifications.

But it is clear to anyone who reads military history and current military events news that Operation Iraq Freedom (even in its name) is, among other things, a trial run for many, many concepts that have been incubating at the Pentagon for twenty years or more.

SecDef is clearly on the RMA, "light", mixed-use expeditionary side of these battles. This has provoked (bureaucratic) conflict between SecDef and (mostly) Army guys who want more heavy armor-sealift type forces. Of this there is no doubt.

It's unclear at present whether the SecDef-approved war plan is proceeding according to expectations, or not (I don't take the press herd seriously).

But if it should not proceed according to expectations, goody points are going to flow to the armor boys and their supporters, and the light-expeditionary advocates are going to have some 'splainin' to do.

The big picture, of course, is that both of these "sides" (and the air-power side, too) are advocating tactics to avoid refighting Gettysburg, for which we really should thank them.

The only potential problem I see with this is that Saddam's hero Stalin actually got his Red Army tactics to work, and that neither the "heavy" guys, the "light-expeditionary" guys, or the air power guys seek or have planned for a battle where we have to catch the bad guys by the hair and cut their hearts out with bayonets.

All American tactics (of whatever Pentagon "side") are in support of a strategy wherein the enemy collapses at some point under unbearable pressure.

If all Saddam has to do to "win" is not collapse, we will have made his task easier.

The theme of "Iraq Freedom" would be better applied after Operation Crush Your Enemies and See them Driven Before You-but we are not barbarians.

65 posted on 03/29/2003 6:05:39 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson