Skip to comments.
THE PROS AND CONS OF SHERYL CROW
PAGE SIX - New York Post ^
| 3/03/03
| RICHARD JOHNSON with PAULA FROELICH and CHRIS WILSON
Posted on 03/03/2003 1:08:07 AM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: kattracks
Pro: Great Legs
Con: duplicitous
Pro: too stupid to cover duplicity
21
posted on
03/03/2003 1:48:38 PM PST
by
Smedley
To: TexRef
She is hot — especially for 40-years old! I totally agree.
She is also dumb as a rock.
I totally agree.
22
posted on
03/03/2003 1:49:49 PM PST
by
Smedley
To: Byron_the_Aussie
No Dem can be 'hot' okay? I'm asking you to be strong, here. :) Well, she's "hot" until she opens her mouth to do anything other than sing.
23
posted on
03/03/2003 1:50:42 PM PST
by
Smedley
To: Byron_the_Aussie
I love that comeback.
As far as those who think Crow is hot, regardless of her moronic thought processes, how many of you are gonna fess up to your lusts for the Hildebeast?
As for me, when I discover a good looker's alliance with Communism, they turn instantly and forever UGLY! They're as hot as a fresh steaming pile of....oh, never mind.
24
posted on
03/03/2003 2:38:19 PM PST
by
JoJo Gunn
(Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered....)
To: TexRef
She's artificially hot... thanks to plastic surgery.
25
posted on
03/03/2003 2:44:26 PM PST
by
Sloth
("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobin Mugatu, Zoolander)
To: TexRef
Looks don't mean anything when you have mush for brains, and that includes Ms. Crow. Good looks don't redeem idiots. And the Crow is an idiot through and through.
26
posted on
03/03/2003 3:00:22 PM PST
by
Luna
(Evil will not triumph...God is at the helm)
To: Lizavetta
Bleah.
27
posted on
03/03/2003 3:02:46 PM PST
by
Chancellor Palpatine
(those who unilaterally beat their swords into plowshares wind up plowing for those who don't)
To: Lizavetta
...I still think the women of yesteryear - Grace Kelly, Carole Lombard, Paulette Goddard, Sophia Loren - absolutely bury today's broads....Thank you SO MUCH, for saying that.
It's when you look at the lust for the Mariah Careys, the Meg Ryans and the Sheryls that you realise how far our standards have fallen. Compare today's bimbos, with their Botox and silicone, to the dream creatures of the 50s: Ava Gardner, or Susan Hayward. You don't know who to pity more, today's lusters, or the lustees (to stretch a noun!) Cheers, By.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson