Bush: U.S. will enforce resolution on Iraq

UPI ^ | March 1, 2003 | Kathy A. Gambrell

[MadIvan]

No wonder your name is such. You cannot even make an argument without called the other person bad names.

You are an obvious leftist; you haven't provided a substantive argument from the first moment you posted here. You think that being patronising and ignoring facts is an adequate substitute. Not here, I'm afraid.

Enjoy your zot when it comes.

Ivan

[MadIvan]

By the way:

Read this

Just as millions starve unseen and uncared for in Zimbabwe, so hundreds of thousands of Iraqis will continue to suffer under Saddam's regime if we do not act. If France, Germany, Russia and their allies have their way, Saddam will emerge victorious from this crisis, more powerful and more dangerous to his people and to the Middle East. His heroic stature as the only leader in the Muslim world to stand tall and defiant before the West will be enhanced, even though his embrace of Islam is as cynical and as calculated as his eleventh hour conversion to missile destruction.

Click the link, read the full article and then take a massive dose of shut the hell up.

Ivan

[ez]

A person who calls another person a "heartless barbarian" is a more "heartless barbarian" himself.

Ah, moral equivalence...very shallow.

OK, I'll bite...I say you're a heartless barbarian because you argue for Saddam Hussein's regime to be left in power while he is killing Iraqis, raping women, torturing his political enemies, putting power drills through hands, dropping men into vats of acid, etc, etc.

You say I'm a heartless barbarian because of why?

[headsonpikes]

I agree, W must act in interests of the U.S., irrespective of those of the U.N.