Posted on 02/19/2003 3:43:15 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
Honestly, I read most of that stuff years ago.
Then I invented an antidote.
Of course they will need a standing army to enforce these vaguely defined 'good practices; although a glimpse of such practices are espoused in Principle 12:
Principle 12 of the Charter For Global Democracy: Calls for the cancellation of all debt owed by the poorest nations, global poverty reductions and for "equitable sharing of global resources," as allocated by the UN.
What he is advocating is a global communism; overseen of course by the "Central Committee', which we call the United Nations.
Of course the largest threat to the Central Committee would be addressed in:
Principle 6 of the Charter For Global Democracy: Require UN registration of all arms and the reduction of all national armies.
Position of Kofi Annan: "Let us resolve, therefore: To take energetic action to curb the illegal traffic in small arms, notably by…Creating greater transparency in arms transfers…Supporting regional disarmament measures, such as the moratorium on the importing, exporting or manufacturing of light weapons..." Secretary General Kofi Annan´s report to the Millennium Summit under the section titled "for consideration by the Summit," page 79.
Kofi wants to set a moritorium on the US Constitution, particularly the Second Amendment.....and for those who refuse, there will always be a trip to the 'compulsory International Court' to have your case heard. Which will be populated by the same folks who currently sit on the "Human Rights Commission"..............we all know what a sick joke that is.
Principle 10 of the Charter For Global Democracy: Establishment of International Environmental Court.
Position of Kofi Annan: Secretary General Annan carefully avoided providing details as to how the UN would deal with violators of UN environmental treaties even though he claimed the section of his report entitled "Sustaining our Future" was presented "with a particular sense of urgency."
Since the United Nations would have a standing army, member nations would have 'reduced armed forces', the citizenry would have no means to defend themselves against either if they needed to, I have a good guess.
After the United Nations invaded and took away such 'hooligans', I imagine it would mean a trip to the 'International Court', judge Josef Stalin presiding. No thanks.
Position of Kofi Annan: "At the international level, the more fortunate countries owe a duty of solidarity to the less fortunate.
I agree to some extent, Kofi.
The United States should maintain its sovereignty, and a separate, unsubjugated military. As well as a system of justice founded on Constitutional principles, not the Communist Manifesto.
As it stands, it seems that the United States does indeed feel a solidarity to what you would term less fortunate nations, or smaller nations. They have names such as 'Bulgaria', 'Latvia', 'Poland', 'Czechoslovakia'; these are nations who have lived under a system such as yours with terrible consequences.
So in short Kofi, you are welcome to continue to show solidarity with the thugs and dictators of the world......
.......and the United States will gather its friends together. We don't need the United Nations, nor would I want my security to be dependent on a group of people who can't bring themselves to stop a socialist dictator, and his Blood Ba'ath party.
Then again, I guess you would be opposing yourselves.
Thanks for the ping!
FW, NO doubt about it! Peace and love, George.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.